Territorial Domain
Ninja Defense Reaction
While this is defending, if you've created a Crouching Tiger this turn, this gets +3{d}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.382.379845588
Average Defense Value: Β
2.702.698108515
Hero
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
New
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Zen
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Zen that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Equipment
Tiger Stripe Shuko
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Tide Flippers
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Tide Flippers that play both.
Traverse the Universe
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Mask of Momentum
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Pouncing Paws
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Pouncing Paws that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Tearing Shuko
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Nullrune Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Breaking Scales
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Breaking Scales that play both.
Hood of Second Thoughts
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Hood of Second Thoughts that play both.
Weapon
Tiger Taming Khakkara
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.832.829888712
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.840579710
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
2.772.770114943
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.838541667
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.843915344
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.756892231
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.741239892
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.756363636
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Truce that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Mindstate of Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.722.719387755
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Mindstate of Tiger that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Untamed (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Breed Anger (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Breed Anger (Blue) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Predatory Streak (Blue) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and The Weakest Link that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Attack Action
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.852.854437870
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Chase the Tail that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
2.832.832290363
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.862.856884058
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
2.882.875728155
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
2.692.688741722
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Mauling Qi that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.861052632
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
2.802.801181102
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.852.854794521
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Command and Conquer that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.801546392
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.749391727
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Head Leads the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.792.788059701
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Head Leads the Tail that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Growl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.757462687
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Growl (Red) that play both.
Qi Unleashed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.252.253369272
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Qi Unleashed (Red) that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.704845815
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
1.921.919491525
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Salt the Wound that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Companion of the Claw (Red) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
1.981.984126984
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Find Center
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Find Center that play both.
Qi Unleashed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Qi Unleashed (Blue) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Pounding Gale
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Pounding Gale that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Companion of the Claw (Blue) that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Tenacity that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Smash Up that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Attack Reaction
Maul
Avg. played: Β
2.702.701252236
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Maul that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750877193
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.870103093
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.819407008
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Unravel Aggression
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Unravel Aggression that play both.
Wax Off
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Wax Off that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flic Flak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Flic Flak (Blue) that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Hold the Line that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.743772242
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Tiger Eye Reflex
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714876033
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Tiger Eye Reflex that play both.
Instant
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Pass Over that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.882.878504673
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Art of War that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Snag
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Territorial Domain and Snag that play both.