banner
Put in Context
2079 decks (0.3292%)
Price History
Put in Context
Generic Defense Reaction
This can only defend an attack with 3 or less base {p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.772.765279783
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.672.669308125
Hero
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Equipment
Breaker Helm Protos
Breaker Helm Protos
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Breaker Helm Protos that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Calming Gesture
Calming Gesture
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Calming Gesture that play both.
Silent Stilettos
Silent Stilettos
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Crown of Reflection
Crown of Reflection
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
Phantasmal Footsteps
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Meridian Pathway
Meridian Pathway
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Tide Flippers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Crown of Providence that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Flick Knives that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
Stonewall Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Weapon
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Action
Rage Specter
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Rage Specter that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.848143982
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Astral Etchings (Red)
Astral Etchings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Astral Etchings (Red) that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Truce
Truce
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.794407895
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Truce that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.662011173
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and The Weakest Link that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and This Round's on Me that play both.
10,000 Year Reunion
10,000 Year Reunion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and 10,000 Year Reunion that play both.
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Dual Threat that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Body
Essence of Ancestry: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.489539749
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Essence of Ancestry: Body that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Essence of Ancestry: Mind that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Trot Along that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Command and Conquer that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Phantasmaclasm
Phantasmaclasm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Phantasmaclasm that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Blue)
Enigma Chimera (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Enigma Chimera (Blue) that play both.
Ripple Away
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.721052632
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Ripple Away that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666107383
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Erase Face that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Wind
Second Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Second Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Spectral Prowler (Blue)
Spectral Prowler (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.704641350
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Spectral Prowler (Blue) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Blue)
Spears of Surreality (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Spears of Surreality (Blue) that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Censor that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
2.022.019900498
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Stab Wound
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Stab Wound that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Provoke that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.846793349
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.861435726
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770257388
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Fate Foreseen that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.655688623
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and That All You Got? that play both.
Wax On (Red)
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Pass Over that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Stir the Pot that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.613782051
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.605108055
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.590604027
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Snag that play both.
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Calming Breeze that play both.
Dense Blue Mist
Dense Blue Mist
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Put in Context and Dense Blue Mist that play both.