banner
Head Leads the Tail
2562 decks (0.8188%)
Price History
Head Leads the Tail
Ninja Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks, name another card. Attack action cards with that name have +1{p} this combat chain. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.152.150931599
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.452.449426981
Hero
Benji, the Piercing Wind
Benji, the Piercing Wind
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Katsu
Katsu
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Katsu that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Ira, Crimson Haze
Ira, Crimson Haze
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ira, Crimson Haze that play both.
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
Equipment
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tide Flippers that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Breaking Scales
Breaking Scales
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breaking Scales that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Blood Scent
Blood Scent
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blood Scent that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
Breeze Rider Boots
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Tearing Shuko
Tearing Shuko
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
Blazen Yoroi
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
Vest of the First Fist
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
Mask of Three Tails
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flick Knives that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
Mask of Many Faces
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Weapon
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
Zephyr Needle
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Predatory Streak (Red)
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.495077356
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Roar of the Tiger
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.498833411
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Predatory Streak (Yellow)
Predatory Streak (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.196581197
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Yellow) that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.780219780
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Mindstate of Tiger
Mindstate of Tiger
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.475238923
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mindstate of Tiger that play both.
Predatory Streak (Blue)
Predatory Streak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Energy Potion that play both.
Attack Action
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.132.133794694
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Salt the Wound that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.498351390
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Growl (Red)
Growl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.556561086
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Growl (Red) that play both.
Double Strike
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.445637584
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Double Strike that play both.
Growl (Yellow)
Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.231499051
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Tenacity
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β 
1.761.757142857
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tenacity that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.742796158
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Spring Tidings
Spring Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Spring Tidings that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.705821206
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.553261767
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.451342282
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.374781086
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mauling Qi that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.541528239
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.665463297
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.484167518
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.458781362
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.701095462
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Command and Conquer that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Wander With Purpose
Wander With Purpose
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Wander With Purpose that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Dishonor
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.740079365
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Dishonor that play both.
Flex Claws (Blue)
Flex Claws (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flex Claws (Blue) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Stab Wound
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.432956381
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Stab Wound that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.575652174
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.629411765
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Vipox
Vipox
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Vipox that play both.
Qi Unleashed (Red)
Qi Unleashed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.344036697
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Qi Unleashed (Red) that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Yellow)
Ride the Tailwind (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ride the Tailwind (Yellow) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.515090543
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Blue)
Ride the Tailwind (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ride the Tailwind (Blue) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Lord of Wind
Lord of Wind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Lord of Wind that play both.
Take the Tempo
Take the Tempo
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510324484
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Take the Tempo that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Head Jab (Red)
Head Jab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Head Jab (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Head Jab (Yellow)
Head Jab (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Head Jab (Yellow) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Yellow)
Pouncing Qi (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Qi (Yellow) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.505121043
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.182.183224756
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.494969819
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Concealed Blade that play both.
Knives Out
Knives Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Knives Out that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.653721683
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.653113088
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Wax Off
Wax Off
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Wax Off that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.362657092
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Tiger Eye Reflex
Tiger Eye Reflex
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Eye Reflex that play both.
Instant
Art of War
Art of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.578552279
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Art of War that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.