Head Leads the Tail
Ninja Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks, name another card. Attack action cards with that name have +1{p} this combat chain.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.182.183890764
Average Defense Value: Β
2.542.537748795
Hero
Benji, the Piercing Wind
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Katsu
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Katsu that play both.
Zen
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Zen that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Equipment
Tiger Stripe Shuko
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Mask of Momentum
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tide Flippers that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Pouncing Paws
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Traverse the Universe
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Traverse the Universe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Breaking Scales
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breaking Scales that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blood Scent
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blood Scent that play both.
Tearing Shuko
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Blossom of Spring
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Weapon
Tiger Taming Khakkara
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.682.684913469
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.869565217
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.596680915
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.752155172
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.762476311
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.849715100
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714576271
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.832350463
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.805970149
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Mindstate of Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.572.574303406
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mindstate of Tiger that play both.
Predatory Streak (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.357057416
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Yellow) that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Untamed (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Predatory Streak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.532719836
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Blue) that play both.
Breed Anger (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breed Anger (Blue) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Truce that play both.
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Biting Breeze (Yellow) that play both.
Untamed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Untamed (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.832.827663671
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Chase the Tail that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
2.672.673617247
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.862.858293076
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.866840731
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.871028037
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
2.742.741626794
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Growl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.676190476
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Growl (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.815363881
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.082.078784119
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Salt the Wound that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.646555080
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.770925110
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
2.522.519812527
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mauling Qi that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.659688196
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.792.791006966
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Command and Conquer that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547108209
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
2.732.728609626
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.462.458588957
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Double Strike that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.712.713471133
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Spring Tidings
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Spring Tidings that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.626072041
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Qi Unleashed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.092.087422448
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Qi Unleashed (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Wander With Purpose
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Wander With Purpose that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.473994112
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Flex Claws (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flex Claws (Blue) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Dishonor that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Companion of the Claw (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tenacity that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Vipox
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Vipox that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Stab Wound that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Companion of the Claw (Blue) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ride the Tailwind (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Maul
Avg. played: Β
2.612.611890999
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Maul that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.582.580130719
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.361152142
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.532.532840722
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Concealed Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.770136599
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.749571184
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Territorial Domain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Territorial Domain that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.544715447
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pass Over that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.732.728372093
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Art of War that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.