banner
Head Leads the Tail
6597 decks (1.045%)
Price History
Head Leads the Tail
Ninja Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks, name another card. Attack action cards with that name have +1{p} this combat chain. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.192.186888876
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.542.537699615
Hero
Benji, the Piercing Wind
Benji, the Piercing Wind
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Katsu
Katsu
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Katsu that play both.
Zen
Zen
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Zen that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Equipment
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Twelve Petal Kāṣāya
Twelve Petal Kāṣāya
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Twelve Petal Kāṣāya that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tide Flippers that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
Stride of Reprisal
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Traverse the Universe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Breaking Scales
Breaking Scales
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breaking Scales that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blood Scent
Blood Scent
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blood Scent that play both.
Tearing Shuko
Tearing Shuko
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
Breeze Rider Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
Vest of the First Fist
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
Blazen Yoroi
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
Mask of Three Tails
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Weapon
Tiger Taming Khakkara
Tiger Taming Khakkara
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
Zephyr Needle
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Roar of the Tiger
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.684521611
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.865233351
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.595797281
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.745098039
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.760172626
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.846694796
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714862139
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811662727
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.831375839
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.661290323
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Mindstate of Tiger
Mindstate of Tiger
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.576530612
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mindstate of Tiger that play both.
Predatory Streak (Yellow)
Predatory Streak (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.361061947
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Yellow) that play both.
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Dual Threat that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Untamed (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Predatory Streak (Blue)
Predatory Streak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.536072144
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Blue) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Breed Anger (Blue)
Breed Anger (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breed Anger (Blue) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Biting Breeze (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Chase the Tail
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.823932689
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Chase the Tail that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.673210563
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.855978261
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.865694951
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870668317
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.741532977
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Growl (Red)
Growl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.679911700
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Growl (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.812801403
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.082.081558125
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Salt the Wound that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.648443432
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.768019093
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.523631841
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mauling Qi that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.662877132
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.793552387
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Command and Conquer that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.552130553
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.727095517
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Double Strike
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.459970164
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Double Strike that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714783821
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Spring Tidings
Spring Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Spring Tidings that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.629568106
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Retrace the Past
Retrace the Past
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Retrace the Past that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Growl (Yellow)
Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Qi Unleashed (Red)
Qi Unleashed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.092.091717621
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Qi Unleashed (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Wander With Purpose
Wander With Purpose
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Wander With Purpose that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.471716203
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Flex Claws (Blue)
Flex Claws (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flex Claws (Blue) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Dishonor
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Dishonor that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Red)
Companion of the Claw (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Companion of the Claw (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Tenacity
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tenacity that play both.
Vipox
Vipox
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Vipox that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Stab Wound
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Stab Wound that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Blue)
Companion of the Claw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Companion of the Claw (Blue) that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Yellow)
Ride the Tailwind (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ride the Tailwind (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Maul
Maul
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.611376293
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Maul that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.581336053
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.362518090
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.531479967
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Concealed Blade that play both.
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Throw Dagger that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.772018349
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.747486034
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Territorial Domain
Territorial Domain
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Territorial Domain that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.544483986
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pass Over that play both.
Art of War
Art of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.728943695
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Art of War that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.