Head Leads the Tail
Ninja Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks, name another card. Attack action cards with that name have +1{p} this combat chain.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.182.179040405
Average Defense Value: Β
2.542.537587764
Hero
Benji, the Piercing Wind
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Katsu
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Katsu that play both.
Zen
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Zen that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Equipment
Tiger Stripe Shuko
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Mask of Momentum
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Tide Flippers
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tide Flippers that play both.
Pouncing Paws
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Traverse the Universe
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Traverse the Universe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Breaking Scales
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breaking Scales that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blood Scent
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blood Scent that play both.
Tearing Shuko
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Blossom of Spring
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Weapon
Tiger Taming Khakkara
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.692.687258687
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.876428960
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.598971722
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.766628440
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.851985560
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.771409750
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
2.722.720882150
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.833476395
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.802620087
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Mindstate of Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.572.573976915
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mindstate of Tiger that play both.
Predatory Streak (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.358834244
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Yellow) that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Untamed (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.432.428571429
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Truce that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Predatory Streak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.530208333
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Predatory Streak (Blue) that play both.
Breed Anger (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Breed Anger (Blue) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Biting Breeze (Yellow) that play both.
Untamed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Untamed (Blue) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.842.837139019
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Chase the Tail that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
2.682.676038455
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.872.865817410
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.873134328
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.873885350
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
2.752.745721271
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Growl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.673984120
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Growl (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.082.075039746
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Salt the Wound that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.821763602
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.647342995
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.776748971
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
2.522.519929141
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mauling Qi that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.655565693
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.792.789129011
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Command and Conquer that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.541947927
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
2.742.735783634
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.462.457323498
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Double Strike that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.722.717008798
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Spring Tidings
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Spring Tidings that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.629729730
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Qi Unleashed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.102.099303136
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Qi Unleashed (Red) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Wander With Purpose
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Wander With Purpose that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.474268416
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Flex Claws (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flex Claws (Blue) that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Dishonor that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Companion of the Claw (Red) that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β
1.431.426160338
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tenacity that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Vipox
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Vipox that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Stab Wound that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Companion of the Claw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Companion of the Claw (Blue) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ride the Tailwind (Yellow) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Maul
Avg. played: Β
2.622.617364747
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Maul that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.582.582149558
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.357034796
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.532.531719533
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Concealed Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.769752787
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750885478
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Territorial Domain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Territorial Domain that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.543410853
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Pass Over that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.732.728074246
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Art of War that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Head Leads the Tail and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.