Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Ninja Attack Action - Attack
Combo - If a card with Gustwave in its name was the last attack this combat chain, this costs {r}{r} less to play, and has go again and "When this attacks, you may banish a card with combo from your graveyard. If you do, search your deck for a card with the same name, banish it, then shuffle. You may play it this combat chain."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.832.833978252
Average Defense Value: Β
2.602.604254249
Hero
Katsu, the Wanderer
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Katsu
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Katsu that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Zen
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Zen that play both.
Equipment
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Traverse the Universe
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Tide Flippers
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Breaking Scales
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Mask of Momentum
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Pouncing Paws
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Spell Fray Tiara
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Spell Fray Tiara that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Weapon
Tiger Taming Khakkara
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
2.792.791222703
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.792.792079208
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
2.722.724102210
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.732762313
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733170732
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.748863636
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.741280913
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.512.507989907
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Retrace the Past
Avg. played: Β
2.902.903225806
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Retrace the Past that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.816960716
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.858584568
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811569741
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
2.822.822364901
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746192893
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Chase the Tail that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.862.861111111
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.847936873
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β
2.852.845001249
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Dishonor that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.847747672
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.852.853446648
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.806987758
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.817915100
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834456929
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.831307441
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.752750933
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Surging Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.862.856881990
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Lord of Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.862.859337780
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Lord of Wind that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790402338
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
2.762.761925844
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.786781532
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.754789272
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790094683
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
2.632.628602860
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mauling Qi that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.222.215093995
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.911.914872003
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.780057252
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.112.106824331
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Mugenshi: RELEASE
Avg. played: Β
1.861.860476481
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mugenshi: RELEASE that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
1.321.324683965
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
1.291.292908828
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β
1.511.508166295
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tenacity that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Cyclone Roundhouse
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Cyclone Roundhouse that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.572.568904594
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Double Strike that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.842.840153453
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.102.098225056
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.612.613813591
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834744605
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.758122066
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Instant
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.772.765384335
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555555556
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Snag
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Snag that play both.
Visit the Floating Dojo
Avg. played: Β
1.501.502159403
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Visit the Floating Dojo that play both.