Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Ninja Attack Action - Attack
Combo - If a card with Gustwave in its name was the last attack this combat chain, this costs {r}{r} less to play, and has go again and "When this attacks, you may banish a card with combo from your graveyard. If you do, search your deck for a card with the same name, banish it, then shuffle. You may play it this combat chain."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.832.834281474
Average Defense Value: Β
2.602.604304022
Hero
Katsu, the Wanderer
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Katsu
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Katsu that play both.
Zen
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Zen that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Equipment
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Traverse the Universe
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Tide Flippers
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Breaking Scales
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Mask of Momentum
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Pouncing Paws
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Spell Fray Tiara
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Spell Fray Tiara that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Weapon
Tiger Taming Khakkara
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790421053
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.792.791888197
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
2.722.724328050
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.732961852
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733690360
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.749715586
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742058450
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.512.509197324
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.816869908
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.858327486
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811531974
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
2.822.821842152
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.752.745868107
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Chase the Tail that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.847992116
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β
2.852.845035314
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Dishonor that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.847532881
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714285714
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.852.852822011
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.806690455
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.817882310
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834300150
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.831506173
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.753321227
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Surging Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.862.856915015
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Lord of Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.862.859488400
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Lord of Wind that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.789845326
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
2.762.761804711
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.786108494
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.754993160
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
2.792.789757020
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
2.632.628024637
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mauling Qi that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.222.215106732
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.911.913688058
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.779313632
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.112.107117830
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Mugenshi: RELEASE
Avg. played: Β
1.861.860280659
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mugenshi: RELEASE that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
1.331.325116589
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
1.291.292063492
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β
1.511.506656805
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tenacity that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Cyclone Roundhouse
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Cyclone Roundhouse that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.572.568959436
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Double Strike that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.842.840040841
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.102.097167382
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.612.612987013
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834333515
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.757121439
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Instant
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.762.764941399
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555298473
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Snag
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Snag that play both.
Visit the Floating Dojo
Avg. played: Β
1.501.501765398
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Visit the Floating Dojo that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.