banner
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
19396 decks (2.946%)
Price History
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Ninja Attack Action - Attack
Combo - If a card with Gustwave in its name was the last attack this combat chain, this costs {r}{r} less to play, and has go again and "When this attacks, you may banish a card with combo from your graveyard. If you do, search your deck for a card with the same name, banish it, then shuffle. You may play it this combat chain."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.832.833935353
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.602.604320993
Hero
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Katsu
Katsu
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Katsu that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Zen
Zen
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Zen that play both.
Equipment
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Twelve Petal Kāṣāya
Twelve Petal Kāṣāya
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Twelve Petal Kāṣāya that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
Stride of Reprisal
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Breaking Scales
Breaking Scales
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
Breeze Rider Boots
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
Blazen Yoroi
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Spell Fray Tiara
Spell Fray Tiara
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Spell Fray Tiara that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
Spell Fray Gloves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Tiger Taming Khakkara
Tiger Taming Khakkara
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
Zephyr Needle
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Ancestral Harmony
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.791360101
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.791844187
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.723793103
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733020077
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733170732
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.748866213
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.741772152
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.509243697
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Roar of the Tiger
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Retrace the Past
Retrace the Past
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.918918919
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Retrace the Past that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.817064737
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.858699114
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811618639
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.845070423
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.822344975
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Chase the Tail
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.746483481
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Chase the Tail that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.848057695
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Dishonor
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.844940649
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Dishonor that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.847871540
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.807058194
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.853626332
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.818223360
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.834656702
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.831181630
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.753361946
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Surging Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857028845
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Lord of Wind
Lord of Wind
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.859228487
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Lord of Wind that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.789987653
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.761720905
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.786759769
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Descendent Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.754203691
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.790101892
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Mauling Qi
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.629010989
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mauling Qi that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow)
Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.222.215054745
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.911.914923858
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.780534351
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Yellow)
Descendent Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.112.107767670
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Mugenshi: RELEASE
Mugenshi: RELEASE
Avg. played: Β 
1.861.861577794
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Mugenshi: RELEASE that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
1.321.324701195
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
1.291.292725173
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Tenacity
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β 
1.511.507390983
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tenacity that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Yellow)
Whelming Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Cyclone Roundhouse
Cyclone Roundhouse
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Cyclone Roundhouse that play both.
Double Strike
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.569056870
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Double Strike that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.840360422
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.102.098039216
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.613898179
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.834967320
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.758665917
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Instant
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Art of War
Art of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.765350077
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554988399
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Snag that play both.
Visit the Floating Dojo
Visit the Floating Dojo
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.502347418
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bonds of Ancestry (Red) and Visit the Floating Dojo that play both.