Visit Goldmane Estate
Guardian Action
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.)
Create a Gold token. Then if you control 3 or more Gold, create that many Might tokens.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.715.710256527
Average Defense Value: Β
2.862.863479030
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Equipment
Aurum Aegis
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Boots
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Civic Steps
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Civic Steps that play both.
Crown of Dominion
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Tectonic Plating
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Time Skippers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Time Skippers that play both.
Craterhoof
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Craterhoof that play both.
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crater Fist that play both.
Base of the Mountain
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Golden Glare
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Golden Glare that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Anothos that play both.
Flail of Agony
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Flail of Agony that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Daily Grind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Daily Grind that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Germinate that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.692.687943262
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and The Weakest Link that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.092.087804878
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Midas Touch that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Tear Asunder that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arc Lightning that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Leave a Dent that play both.
Attack Action
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.752.745747874
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and The Golden Son that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.806610408
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807539683
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.803800202
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807396664
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.802.801908618
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.799412628
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.800626305
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.792631918
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.782.782427476
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Command and Conquer that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.764235764
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.812.812000743
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.861529319
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.762.757289204
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.764496546
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Headbutt that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.801907969
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.757497581
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.773942470
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pec Perfect that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.598997494
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.644882268
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Bravado
Avg. played: Β
2.632.625000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Bravado that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.536020151
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Disable (Red) that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.633501259
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Boulder Drop that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.522156573
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Erase Face that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.451.454618474
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pulverize that play both.
Fault Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Fault Line that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Bet Big that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Primed to Fight that play both.
Call for Backup
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Call for Backup that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crippling Crush that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.710160266
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.736235955
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.762.759663866
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.802.797225622
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.802.796619962
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.290343915
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.