Visit Goldmane Estate
Guardian Action
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.)
Create a Gold token. Then if you control 3 or more Gold, create that many Might tokens.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
5.885.881795659
Average Defense Value:
2.872.869762971
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Victor Goldmane
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Equipment
Aurum Aegis
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Civic Steps
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Boots
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Dominion
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Balance of Justice
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Balance of Justice that play both.
Tectonic Plating
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Time Skippers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Time Skippers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Crater Fist
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crater Fist that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Golden Glare
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Golden Glare that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Titan's Fist that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Anothos that play both.
Flail of Agony
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Flail of Agony that play both.
Action
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.672.667444574
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and The Weakest Link that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
2.622.621109608
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Tear Asunder that play both.
Attack Action
The Golden Son
Avg. played:
2.642.640649150
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and The Golden Son that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.686983765
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played:
2.692.686605610
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Cranial Crush that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
2.682.683318978
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.686718977
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.686182670
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.682.680223991
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.682.683773361
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.670061728
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.674757282
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.815423515
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.692.694454513
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.742.739251592
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played:
2.692.692106248
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.662.663643235
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.652.654450262
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.545000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.654290429
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.474541752
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Disable (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.579315708
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.552.550970874
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.470993117
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.567110036
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played:
1.491.489270386
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pulverize that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Boulder Drop that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Primed to Fight that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Bet Big that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.637327337
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.683507549
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.682.675742574
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played:
2.682.679692126
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.263090677
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
