Visit Goldmane Estate
Guardian Action
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.)
Create a Gold token. Then if you control 3 or more Gold, create that many Might tokens.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.655.654655341
Average Defense Value: Β
2.862.861437856
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Equipment
Aurum Aegis
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Boots
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Civic Steps
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Civic Steps that play both.
Crown of Dominion
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Tectonic Plating
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Time Skippers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Time Skippers that play both.
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Golden Glare
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Golden Glare that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Craterhoof
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Craterhoof that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Anothos that play both.
Flail of Agony
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Flail of Agony that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Germinate that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.692.686855670
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and The Weakest Link that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Tear Asunder that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arc Lightning that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.112.111111111
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Midas Touch that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Show Time! that play both.
Attack Action
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.742.736557820
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and The Golden Son that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807584663
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.812.808435604
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.804871060
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.808197431
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.802.802565211
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.800438276
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.801306801
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.793296985
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.772.772652659
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Command and Conquer that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.764901212
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.812.806807728
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.861045131
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.762.757272013
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.764705882
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.802517483
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.758664955
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.773954116
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.598747390
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.646411483
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Headbutt that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.537185930
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Disable (Red) that play both.
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pec Perfect that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.634530561
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Boulder Drop that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.523564065
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Erase Face that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.451.453963171
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pulverize that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Bet Big that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crippling Crush that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Clash of Bravado
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Bravado that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Primed to Fight that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Endless Winter that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Star Struck that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.704368642
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.725144588
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.732.732057416
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.802.797888182
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.802.797237013
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.286542176
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.