banner
Visit Goldmane Estate
5202 decks (1.020%)
Price History
Visit Goldmane Estate
Guardian Action
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.) Create a Gold token. Then if you control 3 or more Gold, create that many Might tokens. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
5.825.824724458
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.872.867922305
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Victor Goldmane
Victor Goldmane
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Equipment
Aurum Aegis
Aurum Aegis
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Time Skippers that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crater Fist that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Golden Glare
Golden Glare
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Golden Glare that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Titan's Fist that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Anothos that play both.
Flail of Agony
Flail of Agony
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Flail of Agony that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
98% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Germinate
Germinate
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Germinate that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Arc Lightning
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arc Lightning that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.670886076
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and The Weakest Link that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642857143
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Tear Asunder that play both.
Attack Action
The Golden Son
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.644532803
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and The Golden Son that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.700266430
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.700000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Cranial Crush that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.697989609
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.698203320
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.700527402
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.693370166
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.695753616
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.686393526
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.673393124
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.817017083
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.689200561
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.704845815
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.732214974
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.674496644
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.668969182
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.546468401
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.602617490
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.654422789
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.486470588
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Disable (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554442218
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.592286501
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.479831933
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.597701149
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Pulverize
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β 
1.481.477447745
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pulverize that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600910470
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Boulder Drop that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Bet Big that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Primed to Fight that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crippling Crush that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Star Struck that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.643315244
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.690861390
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.687338501
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Trounce
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.690196078
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.261607143
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.