banner
Visit Goldmane Estate
8312 decks (1.191%)
Price History
Visit Goldmane Estate
Guardian Action
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.) Create a Gold token. Then if you control 3 or more Gold, create that many Might tokens. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
5.715.710653137
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.862.863341593
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
Victor Goldmane
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Equipment
Aurum Aegis
Aurum Aegis
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Civic Steps that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Time Skippers that play both.
Craterhoof
Craterhoof
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Craterhoof that play both.
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crater Fist that play both.
Golden Glare
Golden Glare
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Golden Glare that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Anothos that play both.
Flail of Agony
Flail of Agony
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Flail of Agony that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Germinate
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Germinate that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.687741935
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and The Weakest Link that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Tear Asunder that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
2.072.070351759
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Midas Touch that play both.
Daily Grind
Daily Grind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Daily Grind that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Arc Lightning
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Arc Lightning that play both.
Leave a Dent
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Leave a Dent that play both.
Attack Action
The Golden Son
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.745427211
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and The Golden Son that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.806401579
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.807157058
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.803432362
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.807004796
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.801621778
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.798852266
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800388466
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.792358536
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.782027727
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Command and Conquer that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.764000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.812058057
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.861474435
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.757390619
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.764705882
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Headbutt that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.801406470
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.757105943
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.774270197
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Pec Perfect
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pec Perfect that play both.
Clash of Bravado
Clash of Bravado
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Bravado that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.598494354
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.644165863
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.535282258
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Disable (Red) that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.633501259
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
New
Put 'Em In Their Place
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Boulder Drop that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Fault Line
Fault Line
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Fault Line that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.521449704
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Erase Face that play both.
Pulverize
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β 
1.451.453815261
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pulverize that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Bet Big that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Primed to Fight that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Crippling Crush that play both.
New
Grind Them Down (Red)
Grind Them Down (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Grind Them Down (Red) that play both.
New
Disenchantment of the Old Ones
Disenchantment of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Disenchantment of the Old Ones that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.709853186
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.735907554
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.757627119
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797002725
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Trounce
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.796325763
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.289508632
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Resource
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Visit Goldmane Estate and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.