banner
Miller's Grindstone
12087 decks (1.616%)
Price History
Miller's Grindstone
Guardian Weapon - Hammer (1h)
Once per Turn Action -- {r}{r}{r}: Attack When this hits a hero, clash with them. If you win, destroy the top card of their deck. If they win, put a -1{p} counter on this. (Clashing heroes reveal the top card of their deck. The hero that reveals the card with greatest {p} wins.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
6.066.058678957
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.872.871230129
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
Victor Goldmane
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Civic Steps that play both.
Aurum Aegis
Aurum Aegis
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Balance of Justice that play both.
New
Ironfist Revelation
Ironfist Revelation
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Ironfist Revelation that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Craterhoof
Craterhoof
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Craterhoof that play both.
Golden Glare
Golden Glare
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Golden Glare that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Crater Fist that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Time Skippers that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
New
Attention Grabbers
Attention Grabbers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Attention Grabbers that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Stand Ground
Stand Ground
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Stand Ground that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Testament of Valahai
Testament of Valahai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Testament of Valahai that play both.
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
Stonewall Impasse
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
Tremorshield Sabatons
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
Anothos
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Visit Goldmane Estate
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811952988
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.748048261
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Tear Asunder that play both.
New
Two Steps Ahead
Two Steps Ahead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Two Steps Ahead that play both.
New
Cruel Ambition
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Cruel Ambition that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Daily Grind
Daily Grind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Daily Grind that play both.
Leave a Dent
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Leave a Dent that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and The Weakest Link that play both.
New
Sadistic Scowl
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
2.192.186440678
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Midas Touch that play both.
New
Villainous Pose (Red)
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.571428571
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
New
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.571428571
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Booze! that play both.
New
Cheap Shot
Cheap Shot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Cheap Shot that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Promising Terrain
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Promising Terrain that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
New
Revolting Gesture
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Revolting Gesture that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.780762485
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.815237538
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.813433584
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.805861172
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811909651
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Spinal Crush that play both.
The Golden Son
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.814360771
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and The Golden Son that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770304569
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.776656915
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.779584365
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.761360845
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770707071
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.871432818
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Command and Conquer that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.862653601
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.866608392
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770502327
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.739452009
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.719452774
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.731384555
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.694806421
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Pec Perfect
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Pec Perfect that play both.
Headbutt
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Headbutt that play both.
New
Fix the Match
Fix the Match
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Fix the Match that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.723156929
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Primed to Fight that play both.
New
Short Shrift
Short Shrift
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Short Shrift that play both.
New
Right Behind You (Blue)
Right Behind You (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Right Behind You (Blue) that play both.
New
Escalate Violence
Escalate Violence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Escalate Violence that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.615813953
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
New
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.683939873
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
New
Cut a Long Story Short
Cut a Long Story Short
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Cut a Long Story Short that play both.
New
The Old Switcheroo
The Old Switcheroo
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and The Old Switcheroo that play both.
Disable (Red)
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.568853641
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Disable (Red) that play both.
Clash of Bravado
Clash of Bravado
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.709677419
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Clash of Bravado that play both.
Pulverize
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β 
1.851.852290273
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Pulverize that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.698284080
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
New
Overturn the Results
Overturn the Results
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Overturn the Results that play both.
New
Power Play (Blue)
Power Play (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Power Play (Blue) that play both.
Grind Them Down (Red)
Grind Them Down (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Grind Them Down (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Overcrowded that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454645410
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
New
Bully Tactics
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Bully Tactics that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Boulder Drop that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Yellow)
Thunk (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Thunk (Yellow) that play both.
Grind Them Down (Blue)
Grind Them Down (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Grind Them Down (Blue) that play both.
Put 'Em In Their Place
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Thunk (Red)
Thunk (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Thunk (Red) that play both.
Hostile Encroachment
Hostile Encroachment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Hostile Encroachment that play both.
New
Cut the Small Talk
Cut the Small Talk
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Cut the Small Talk that play both.
New
Small Problem
Small Problem
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Small Problem that play both.
New
Story Beats (Blue)
Story Beats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Story Beats (Blue) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
New
Gang Robbery
Gang Robbery
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Gang Robbery that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Yellow)
Clash of Vigor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Clash of Vigor (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.647430724
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.757575758
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.634817814
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777452416
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Trounce
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800813455
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Trounce that play both.
New
Truth or Trickery
Truth or Trickery
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Truth or Trickery that play both.
Test of Vigor
Test of Vigor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Test of Vigor that play both.
Instant
New
Leave Them Hanging
Leave Them Hanging
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Leave Them Hanging that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
New
What Happens Next?
What Happens Next?
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and What Happens Next? that play both.
New
The Suspense is Killing Me
The Suspense is Killing Me
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and The Suspense is Killing Me that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.419916017
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
New
To Be Continued...
To Be Continued...
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and To Be Continued... that play both.
Seismic Eruption
Seismic Eruption
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Seismic Eruption that play both.
New
Liar's Charm
Liar's Charm
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Liar's Charm that play both.
New
In the Palm of Your Hand
In the Palm of Your Hand
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and In the Palm of Your Hand that play both.
New
Act of Glory (Blue)
Act of Glory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Act of Glory (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Miller's Grindstone and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.