The Golden Son
Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.)
As an additional cost to play this, you may destroy a Gold you control. If you do, this gets +3{p} and overpower.
When you win a clash revealing this, create a Gold token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
6.026.020633410
Average Defense Value: Β
2.872.874316225
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Equipment
Aurum Aegis
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Civic Steps
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Civic Steps that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Boots
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Tectonic Plating
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Dominion
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Craterhoof
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Craterhoof that play both.
Crater Fist
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Crater Fist that play both.
Golden Glare
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Golden Glare that play both.
Time Skippers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Time Skippers that play both.
Base of the Mountain
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Nullrune Robe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Titan's Fist
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Anothos that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Flail of Agony
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Flail of Agony that play both.
Action
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746077570
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.732.731933292
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Tear Asunder that play both.
Daily Grind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Daily Grind that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.682.675422139
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and The Weakest Link that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Germinate that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.012.005376344
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Midas Touch that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Arc Lightning that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Leave a Dent that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.822142202
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.832.826270278
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.825380637
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.818990017
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.817103348
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.822.822654632
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Spinal Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.818037135
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.817861151
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.788871555
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807380074
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Command and Conquer that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.879641089
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.810174055
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.822.819493461
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.782.784067727
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Headbutt that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.793641448
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.748380596
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.719059589
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.734905209
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β
2.832.833333333
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Pec Perfect that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.620794393
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729645390
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Primed to Fight that play both.
Clash of Bravado
Avg. played: Β
2.652.647058824
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Clash of Bravado that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.566600398
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Disable (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
2.692.685845394
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.821.822458270
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Pulverize that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Boulder Drop that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.599084668
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.469343696
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Call for Backup
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Call for Backup that play both.
Fault Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Fault Line that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Bet Big that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.740307242
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.772.766071429
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.583969466
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.812.813026661
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.812.809615101
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Trounce that play both.
Test of Vigor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Test of Vigor that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.350318471
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.