The Golden Son
Guardian Attack Action - Attack
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.)
As an additional cost to play this, you may destroy a Gold you control. If you do, this gets +3{p} and overpower.
When you win a clash revealing this, create a Gold token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
6.116.109979506
Average Defense Value:
2.882.876214616
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Victor Goldmane
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Equipment
Aurum Aegis
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Civic Steps
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Boots
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Tectonic Plating
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Balance of Justice
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Dominion
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcane Lantern
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Time Skippers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Time Skippers that play both.
Crater Fist
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Crater Fist that play both.
Golden Glare
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Golden Glare that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Weapon
Miller's Grindstone
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Flail of Agony
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Flail of Agony that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played:
2.642.643857543
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Germinate that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
2.722.721711853
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Tear Asunder that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Arc Lightning that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.652.650835532
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and The Weakest Link that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.784427507
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played:
2.792.788483516
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.783963183
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.787759485
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
2.792.785500136
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.776434500
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.780333952
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.782498042
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.755611496
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.784710512
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.867188519
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.772.774880952
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played:
2.772.767270041
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.792.786268737
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.742.735977248
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.713030981
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.742.739276537
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.673025088
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.611758989
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played:
2.722.724856539
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Primed to Fight that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.546787523
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Disable (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played:
2.712.713341594
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played:
1.831.834600760
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Pulverize that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played:
2.592.590909091
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.455295736
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.557485030
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Boulder Drop that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.721498662
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.601837672
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.772.772483164
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played:
2.772.770145431
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Trounce that play both.
Test of Vigor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Test of Vigor that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.347257172
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both The Golden Son and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.