banner
Aurum Aegis
14153 decks (2.241%)
Price History
Aurum Aegis
Guardian Equipment - Off Hand
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.) This counts as a Gold. Temper (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, put a -1{d} counter on it, then if it has 0{d}, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
5.975.969927810
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.872.868546109
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Victor Goldmane
Victor Goldmane
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Civic Steps that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Time Skippers that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crater Fist that play both.
Golden Glare
Golden Glare
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Golden Glare that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Weapon
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Anothos that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Flail of Agony
Flail of Agony
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Flail of Agony that play both.
Action
Visit Goldmane Estate
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.706493506
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.722144522
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tear Asunder that play both.
Germinate
Germinate
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Germinate that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Roiling Fissure that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.667525773
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and The Weakest Link that play both.
Arc Lightning
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arc Lightning that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Attack Action
The Golden Son
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.756845805
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and The Golden Son that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.814757313
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.817328282
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.816798386
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.815061562
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811087778
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811312826
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.810711793
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.810750901
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.783029107
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.786760157
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Command and Conquer that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.879849074
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.804275073
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.783639664
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797119963
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.753442841
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.726472027
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.785919025
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.732784431
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.623864783
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.731421523
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Primed to Fight that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Disable (Red)
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.558392178
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.684584980
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Pulverize
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β 
1.821.819374851
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Pulverize that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Boulder Drop that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.456843109
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.583290356
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Bet Big that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Endless Winter
Endless Winter
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Endless Winter that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crippling Crush that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Star Struck that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.644157663
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.720647125
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.711340206
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.564303380
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.805753096
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Trounce
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.802591720
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.