Aurum Aegis
Guardian Equipment - Off Hand
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.)
This counts as a Gold. Temper (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, put a -1{d} counter on it, then if it has 0{d}, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
6.086.078251836
Average Defense Value:
2.872.870404296
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Victor Goldmane
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Boots
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Tectonic Plating
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Balance of Justice
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Dominion
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcane Lantern
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Time Skippers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Time Skippers that play both.
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crater Fist that play both.
Golden Glare
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Golden Glare that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Weapon
Miller's Grindstone
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Flail of Agony
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Flail of Agony that play both.
Action
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played:
2.652.646892039
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Germinate that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
2.712.713131313
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tear Asunder that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arc Lightning that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.652.651248844
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and The Weakest Link that play both.
Attack Action
The Golden Son
Avg. played:
2.742.744641275
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and The Golden Son that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.795773276
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played:
2.802.798368069
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.794859071
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.798213927
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
2.802.796381910
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.791313131
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.791753220
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.794146662
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.769266374
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.789688427
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.874089936
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.782.779197316
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played:
2.772.773336874
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.782.784887873
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.753508456
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.723122495
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.758072064
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.697482945
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.621351565
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played:
2.732.728524590
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Primed to Fight that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.548311991
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played:
1.831.833071690
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Pulverize that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played:
2.612.605633803
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.447474747
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.552295918
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Boulder Drop that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Bet Big that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.712144803
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.576455256
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.