Aurum Aegis
Guardian Equipment - Off Hand
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.)
This counts as a Gold. Temper (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, put a -1{d} counter on it, then if it has 0{d}, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
5.955.954192017
Average Defense Value: Β
2.872.868104247
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of Iron Will
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Civic Steps
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Civic Steps that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Boots
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Tectonic Plating
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Dominion
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcane Lantern
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Time Skippers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Time Skippers that play both.
Crater Fist
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crater Fist that play both.
Golden Glare
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Golden Glare that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Titan's Fist
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Anothos that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Flail of Agony
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Flail of Agony that play both.
Action
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729250814
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.722.723696249
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tear Asunder that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Germinate that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and The Weakest Link that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.092.085106383
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Midas Touch that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arc Lightning that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Attack Action
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.772.766356438
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and The Golden Son that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.824217540
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.832.826876608
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.826069636
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.822.824224049
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.820724730
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.820030301
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.819938878
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.822.818738518
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.793328973
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.802.796262225
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Command and Conquer that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.882847968
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.809558442
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.812.807358368
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.782.783105269
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.797468354
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.755293357
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.723604466
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.745587978
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.624310777
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
2.732.730265163
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Primed to Fight that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.563417891
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
2.682.683519876
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.821.815826006
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Pulverize that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.593406593
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Boulder Drop that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.461828464
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Bet Big that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crippling Crush that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Endless Winter that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.724292562
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733716475
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.559500585
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.