Aurum Aegis
Guardian Equipment - Off Hand
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.)
This counts as a Gold. Temper (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, put a -1{d} counter on it, then if it has 0{d}, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
6.096.094358612
Average Defense Value:
2.872.870955932
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Victor Goldmane
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Boots
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Tectonic Plating
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Dominion
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Time Skippers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Time Skippers that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Golden Glare
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Golden Glare that play both.
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crater Fist that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Weapon
Miller's Grindstone
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Flail of Agony
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Flail of Agony that play both.
Action
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played:
2.652.648469024
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Germinate that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tear Asunder that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arc Lightning that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.662.659680639
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and The Weakest Link that play both.
Attack Action
The Golden Son
Avg. played:
2.752.748740496
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and The Golden Son that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.798954564
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played:
2.802.801398318
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.797952917
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.801055245
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
2.802.799336994
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.794332153
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.794794902
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.797761700
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.773598381
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.793644765
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.876746580
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.782.783924287
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played:
2.772.774352651
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.792.789893617
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.756553621
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.727481862
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.760631835
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.698536585
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.623003195
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played:
2.732.730616302
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Primed to Fight that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.550832342
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played:
2.652.650000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played:
1.831.833955224
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Pulverize that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.443874936
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Out Muscle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.543918919
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Out Muscle (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Boulder Drop that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Bet Big that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.714719579
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.579805996
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.792.788686348
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played:
2.792.785714286
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Trounce that play both.
Test of Vigor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Test of Vigor that play both.
Instant
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.