Aurum Aegis
Guardian Equipment - Off Hand
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.)
This counts as a Gold. Temper (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, put a -1{d} counter on it, then if it has 0{d}, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
6.256.252591711
Average Defense Value:
2.882.875001440
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Victor Goldmane
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Boots
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Tectonic Plating
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Golden Glare
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Golden Glare that play both.
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crater Fist that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Miller's Grindstone
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Flail of Agony
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Flail of Agony that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
2.782.776607337
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tear Asunder that play both.
Attack Action
The Golden Son
Avg. played:
2.812.813623139
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and The Golden Son that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.862.863203140
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played:
2.872.866339437
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.862.859692425
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.862.864953632
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
2.872.865214832
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.862.857226221
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.862.860550459
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.872.865278368
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.862.863109049
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.839285714
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.832.830126582
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played:
2.912.907978871
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.842.844994618
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played:
2.812.814258399
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.813352685
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.832.827950498
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.764459665
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played:
2.772.770627714
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Primed to Fight that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.832.825045208
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.692890198
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played:
2.752.748488513
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played:
1.911.907185629
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Pulverize that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.608635097
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.503189793
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Yellow) that play both.
Thunk (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunk (Yellow) that play both.
Thunk (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunk (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.734375000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.653503893
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
2.852.851004464
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played:
2.842.844722929
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Trounce that play both.
Test of Vigor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Test of Vigor that play both.
Test of Might
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Test of Might that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.