banner
Lord of Wind
12115 decks (2.146%)
Price History
Lord of Wind
Ninja Attack Action - Attack
Katsu Specialization (You may only have Lord of Wind in your deck if your hero is Katsu.) Combo - If Mugenshi: RELEASE was the last attack this combat chain, you may pay X resource points as an additional cost to play Lord of Wind. If you do, shuffle X target cards named Surging Strike, Whelming Gustwave, and/or Mugenshi: RELEASE from your graveyard into your deck, then Lord of Wind gains X [Power].
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value: 
2.992.988815870
Average Defense Value:  
2.612.609684158
Hero
Katsu, the Wanderer
Katsu, the Wanderer
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Katsu
Katsu
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Katsu that play both.
Equipment
Breaking Scales
Breaking Scales
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Breaking Scales that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
Breeze Rider Boots
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Tide Flippers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
Blazen Yoroi
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
Mask of Many Faces
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
Vest of the First Fist
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Weapon
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
Ancestral Harmony
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played:  
2.772.765865063
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:  
2.562.555627846
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
New
Prowess of Agility
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played:  
2.612.614678899
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Prowess of Agility that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and The Weakest Link that play both.
Attack Action
New
Retrace the Past
Retrace the Past
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Retrace the Past that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.882.879509693
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.872.872826843
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.882.875824176
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played:  
2.882.876310273
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.842.843854137
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Dishonor
Dishonor
Avg. played:  
2.872.868173679
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Dishonor that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.862.861720259
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.872.874704492
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.892.891396648
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.762.758812616
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Surging Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played:  
2.782.778231129
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.812.810722786
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:  
2.882.879830748
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:  
2.852.850644186
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Command and Conquer that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.782.778321358
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Mugenshi: RELEASE
Mugenshi: RELEASE
Avg. played:  
2.022.021210508
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Mugenshi: RELEASE that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.852.846721311
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow)
Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.092.085180284
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.742.744087838
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.752.753579044
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Yellow)
Descendent Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
1.961.962804477
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Descendent Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Tenacity
Tenacity
Avg. played:  
1.511.513623978
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Tenacity that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Yellow)
Whelming Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
1.921.920512201
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Whelming Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Double Strike
Double Strike
Avg. played:  
2.632.629345042
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Double Strike that play both.
Cyclone Roundhouse
Cyclone Roundhouse
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Cyclone Roundhouse that play both.
Leg Tap (Red)
Leg Tap (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Leg Tap (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.662.661779575
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:  
1.401.399507389
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Salt the Wound that play both.
New
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Find Center
Find Center
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Find Center that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Take the Tempo
Take the Tempo
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Take the Tempo that play both.
Rising Knee Thrust (Red)
Rising Knee Thrust (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.472.473861720
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Rising Knee Thrust (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Head Jab (Red)
Head Jab (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Head Jab (Red) that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Standing Order
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Standing Order that play both.
Rising Knee Thrust (Blue)
Rising Knee Thrust (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Rising Knee Thrust (Blue) that play both.
Hurricane Technique
Hurricane Technique
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Hurricane Technique that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:  
2.872.866363636
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.292.289806602
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:  
2.632.632242991
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Concealed Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Flic Flak (Red)
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.862.858488591
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.802.795257732
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flic Flak (Blue)
Flic Flak (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Flic Flak (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Art of War
Art of War
Avg. played:  
2.682.680498697
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Art of War that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.562.564937059
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Even Bigger Than That! (Red)
Even Bigger Than That! (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.702.698986975
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Even Bigger Than That! (Red) that play both.
Visit the Floating Dojo
Visit the Floating Dojo
Avg. played:  
1.851.854882872
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Visit the Floating Dojo that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.552.546762590
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lord of Wind and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.