Even Bigger Than That! (Red)
Generic Instant
Play Even Bigger Than That! only if you've dealt [Power] this turn.
Opt 3, then reveal the top card of your deck. If it has [Power] greater than the amount of damage you've dealt this turn, create a Quicken token and draw a card. (Look at the top 3 cards of your deck. You may put them on the top and/or bottom in any order.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.992.991824884
Average Defense Value:
2.542.540998399
Hero
Jarl Vetreiđi
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Jarl Vetreiđi that play both.
Fai, Rising Rebellion
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Mask of Momentum
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Tide Flippers
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Breaking Scales
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Lightning Greaves
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Nullrune Robe
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Flick Knives
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Tectonic Crust
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Crown of Providence
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Twelve Petal Kāṣāya
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Twelve Petal Kāṣāya that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Shriek Razors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Pouncing Paws
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Traverse the Universe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Blossom of Spring
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Weapon
Harmonized Kodachi
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Star Fall
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Spider's Bite
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Orbitoclast
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Searing Emberblade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Searing Emberblade that play both.
Zephyr Needle
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.712.714975845
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.642.643410853
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Rise from the Ashes (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rise from the Ashes (Red) that play both.
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Pay Day
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Pay Day that play both.
Attack Action
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.802.795477903
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played:
2.842.837438424
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.741576242
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played:
2.862.862305296
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.841070024
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played:
2.772.772098386
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.742.738015608
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Dishonor that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Lord of Wind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Lord of Wind that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.760139050
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.782.776986951
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Surging Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.722772277
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.727826676
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.728260870
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Current Funnel that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played:
2.572.567796610
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Double Strike that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:
2.122.115877437
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Mugenshi: RELEASE
Avg. played:
2.202.198316675
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Mugenshi: RELEASE that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Take the Tempo
Avg. played:
2.482.484467944
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Take the Tempo that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Lava Burst that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Leg Tap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Leg Tap (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.634397528
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.640320733
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Find Center
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Find Center that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rob the Rich (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.501.504237288
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Tenacity that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.861.857142857
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow) that play both.
Regicide
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Regicide that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Stab Wound that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Blue) that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.881.881934566
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fleece the Frail (Red) that play both.
Soaring Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Soaring Strike (Red) that play both.
Rising Knee Thrust (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.443228454
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rising Knee Thrust (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.552.546099291
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Belittle (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:
2.762.755798801
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.452310186
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.632.633112583
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.792786421
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.822409212
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.722.716496945
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.566997519
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.457293035
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Visit the Floating Dojo
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Visit the Floating Dojo that play both.
Even Bigger Than That! (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Even Bigger Than That! (Yellow) that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.