Even Bigger Than That! (Red)
Generic Instant
Play Even Bigger Than That! only if you've dealt [Power] this turn.
Opt 3, then reveal the top card of your deck. If it has [Power] greater than the amount of damage you've dealt this turn, create a Quicken token and draw a card. (Look at the top 3 cards of your deck. You may put them on the top and/or bottom in any order.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.023.015479952
Average Defense Value:
2.552.552810629
Hero
Katsu, the Wanderer
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Fai, Rising Rebellion
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Mask of Momentum
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Breaking Scales
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Robe of Autumn's Fall
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Okana Scar Wraps
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Okana Scar Wraps that play both.
Iris of the Blossom
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Arcane Lantern
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Pouncing Paws
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Base of the Mountain
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Flick Knives
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Perdition
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Nullrune Hood
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Harmonized Kodachi
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Spider's Bite
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Action
Dual Threat
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.782.780169602
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.502.499346405
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Promising Terrain that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Rise from the Ashes (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rise from the Ashes (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
2.782.777777778
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.832.830958799
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.763200369
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.812.809832793
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Seek Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Seek Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Enact Vengeance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Enact Vengeance that play both.
Vengeance Never Rests
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Vengeance Never Rests that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played:
2.862.857002296
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played:
2.782.784639498
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Lord of Wind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Lord of Wind that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Dishonor that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Retrace the Past
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Retrace the Past that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Censor that play both.
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Surging Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.752132701
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.758637957
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.734080189
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.745650870
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played:
2.602.596074380
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Double Strike that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Take the Tempo
Avg. played:
2.552.546380697
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Take the Tempo that play both.
Mugenshi: RELEASE
Avg. played:
2.492.485576923
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Mugenshi: RELEASE that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:
2.122.117410938
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Stab Wound that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Rushing River (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rushing River (Blue) that play both.
Find Center
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Find Center that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Lava Burst that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Leg Tap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Leg Tap (Red) that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Whirling Mist Blossom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Whirling Mist Blossom that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Mauling Qi that play both.
Rob the Rich (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rob the Rich (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Regicide
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Regicide that play both.
Rising Knee Thrust (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Rising Knee Thrust (Blue) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Soaring Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Soaring Strike (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Descendent Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:
2.772.774150268
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.474622152
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.672.665615142
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.837759536
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played:
2.862.864101022
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.722.716265797
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Even Bigger Than That! (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Even Bigger Than That! (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.561561562
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Even Bigger Than That! (Red) and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.