Wander With Purpose
Ninja Attack Action - Attack
Benji Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Benji.)
When this hits, you may discard a card with cost 0. If you do, search your deck for a card with combo, banish it, then shuffle. You may play it this turn.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.891.891513975
Average Defense Value:
2.392.391619413
Hero
Benji, the Piercing Wind
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Equipment
Mask of Momentum
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Tide Flippers that play both.
Pouncing Paws
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Blood Scent
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Blood Scent that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Flick Knives
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Flick Knives that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Breaking Scales
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Breaking Scales that play both.
Tearing Shuko
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Blossom of Spring
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Silken Gi
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Silken Gi that play both.
Weapon
Harmonized Kodachi
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Zephyr Needle that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Tiger Taming Khakkara
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Action
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Biting Breeze (Yellow) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Predatory Streak (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Predatory Streak (Yellow) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Up Sticks and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
Breed Anger (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Breed Anger (Blue) that play both.
Mindstate of Tiger
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Mindstate of Tiger that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Dual Threat that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Untamed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Untamed (Blue) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Arc Lightning that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Attack Action
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Spring Tidings
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Spring Tidings that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Double Strike that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Ride the Tailwind (Yellow) that play both.
Vipox
Avg. played:
1.871.867877270
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Vipox that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Pick Up the Point (Yellow) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:
1.831.832036316
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Salt the Wound that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Head Jab (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Head Jab (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Soul
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Aspect of Tiger: Soul that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Stab Wound that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Ride the Tailwind (Blue) that play both.
Be Like Water (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Be Like Water (Yellow) that play both.
Head Jab (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Head Jab (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
One-Two Punch (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and One-Two Punch (Yellow) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Pick Up the Point (Blue) that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Head Leads the Tail
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Head Leads the Tail that play both.
One-Two Punch (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and One-Two Punch (Blue) that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Chase the Tail that play both.
Recoil (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Recoil (Yellow) that play both.
Flex Claws (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Flex Claws (Blue) that play both.
Recoil (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Recoil (Blue) that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Poisoned Blade (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Hurl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Hurl (Yellow) that play both.
Deadly Duo (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Deadly Duo (Yellow) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Twin Twisters (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Twin Twisters (Yellow) that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Poisoned Blade (Blue) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Mauling Qi that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Growl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Growl (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Find Center
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Find Center that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Cut Through (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Cut Through (Blue) that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Head Jab (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Head Jab (Red) that play both.
Twin Twisters (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Twin Twisters (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Command and Conquer that play both.
Crane Dance (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Crane Dance (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Hurl (Blue) that play both.
Take the Tempo
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Take the Tempo that play both.
Break Tide
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Break Tide that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Deadly Duo (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Deadly Duo (Blue) that play both.
Rushing River (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Rushing River (Yellow) that play both.
Promise of Plenty (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Promise of Plenty (Yellow) that play both.
Flood of Force
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Flood of Force that play both.
Back Heel Kick (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Back Heel Kick (Yellow) that play both.
Plunge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Plunge (Yellow) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Scar for a Scar (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Maul
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Maul that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Concealed Blade that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Throw Dagger that play both.
Knives Out
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Knives Out that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Short and Sharp (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Short and Sharp (Red) that play both.
Rapid Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Rapid Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Tiger Eye Reflex
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Tiger Eye Reflex that play both.
Instant
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Art of War that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Wander With Purpose and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.