Stand Ground
Guardian Equipment - Legs
If you control a Might token, this gets +1{d}.
If you control a Vigor token, this gets +1{d}.
Temper (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, put a -1{d} counter on it, then if it has 0{d}, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.784.783511185
Average Defense Value: Β
2.682.683159513
Hero
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Betsy
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Betsy that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Victor Goldmane that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Lyath Goldmane that play both.
Terra
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Terra that play both.
Equipment
Good Time Chapeau
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Tectonic Plating
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Nullrune Boots
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Vigor Girth
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Vigor Girth that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Golden Glare
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Golden Glare that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Crater Fist
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Crater Fist that play both.
Arcane Lantern
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Aurum Aegis
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gauntlet of Boulderhold
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Gauntlet of Boulderhold that play both.
Richter Scale
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Richter Scale that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Bloodied Oval
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Craterhoof
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Craterhoof that play both.
Bunker Beard
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Bunker Beard that play both.
Crown of Providence
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Crown of Providence that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Anothos that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Titan's Fist
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Titan's Fist that play both.
High Riser
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and High Riser that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.515808491
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.382.382903981
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.752.748310811
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Tear Asunder that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.318359375
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.411053541
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.329292929
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.662.660377358
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.371298405
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Big Bop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.364321608
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Big Bop (Blue) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.377551020
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608040201
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Double Down that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.632.625000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Buckle that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Starting Stake
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Starting Stake that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Draw a Crowd
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Draw a Crowd that play both.
Visit Anvilheim
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Visit Anvilheim that play both.
Attack Action
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.772.773809524
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.589600743
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.702.699650757
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Bet Big that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.671623296
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.583423036
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711640212
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.501890359
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.661596958
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.578645235
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.378920954
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.379396985
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.558490566
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.628185907
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.692.686971235
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Spinal Crush that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.425531915
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.334470990
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.345388788
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
2.602.604770017
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Primed to Fight that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.367201426
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.372050817
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.484602917
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.498417722
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Headbutt that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.602.596658711
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and The Golden Son that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.453947368
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Thump (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.558194774
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Thunk (Red) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.669669670
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Grind Them Down (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Grind Them Down (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.374592834
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Thunk (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.362068966
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Wallop (Yellow) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.486404834
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Wallop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.396296296
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Wallop (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Over the Top (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Over the Top (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.491935484
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Boulder Drop that play both.
Crush Confidence (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Crush Confidence (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Little Big Foot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Little Big Foot (Red) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Flatten the Field (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Flatten the Field (Blue) that play both.
Renounce Grandeur
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Renounce Grandeur that play both.
Smelting of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Smelting of the Old Ones that play both.
Grind Them Down (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Grind Them Down (Blue) that play both.
Captain of the Guard
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Captain of the Guard that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Over the Top (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Over the Top (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.511854951
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Lunging Press that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.463917526
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.659707724
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.632.625000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.482.483933788
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
2.612.614349776
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Trounce that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Test of Vigor
Avg. played: Β
2.402.404669261
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Test of Vigor that play both.
Test of Might
Avg. played: Β
2.432.432098765
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Test of Might that play both.
Instant
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Stand Ground and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.