Sand Cover (Blue)
Draconic Illusionist Instant
Target ash you control gains ward 2 until end of turn. (If your hero would be dealt damage, prevent 2 of that damage and destroy this.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.072.070071760
Average Defense Value:
2.652.646080707
Hero
Equipment
Silken Form
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Silken Form that play both.
Silent Stilettos
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Diadem of Dreamstate
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Diadem of Dreamstate that play both.
Wave of Reality
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Deep Blue
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Ironhide Helm
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Sash of Sandikai
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sash of Sandikai that play both.
Crown of Providence
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Dream Weavers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Helio's Mitre
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Helio's Mitre that play both.
Celestial Kimono
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Celestial Kimono that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Crown of Dominion
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Seeker's Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Seeker's Hood that play both.
Quelling Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Quelling Robe that play both.
Mage Master Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ghostly Touch
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Ironhide Legs
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Reflection
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Weapon
Action
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.371428571
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played:
2.082.084745763
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
1.751.750000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
1.871.872340426
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.082.076923077
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.032.032258065
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
1.831.833333333
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
1.971.973684211
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Burn Them All that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
1.801.800000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.162.160000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.092.088888889
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.921.916666667
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Rake the Embers (Yellow) that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
1.891.891304348
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Themai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.971.972972973
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Rake the Embers (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.022.020408163
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Skittering Sands (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.821.820512821
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Skittering Sands (Blue) that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.582.576923077
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Dust from the Shadow Crypts
Avg. played:
2.082.076923077
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Shadow Crypts that play both.
Skittering Sands (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.391.388888889
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Skittering Sands (Yellow) that play both.
Dust from the Red Desert
Avg. played:
1.921.916666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Red Desert that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Haze Bending that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Healing Balm (Red)
Avg. played:
1.441.444444444
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Healing Balm (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Spirits (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blessing of Spirits (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Aeo
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Tome of Aeo that play both.
Dust from the Golden Plains
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Golden Plains that play both.
Transmogrify (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Transmogrify (Red) that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Lost in Thought that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Sigil of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sigil of Protection (Red) that play both.
Tranquil Passing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Tranquil Passing (Blue) that play both.
Tranquil Passing (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Tranquil Passing (Red) that play both.
Healing Balm (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Healing Balm (Yellow) that play both.
Transmogrify (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Transmogrify (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Pay Up
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Pay Up that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ripple Away that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.266666667
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.142.138461538
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.122.119402985
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.182.177419355
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Embermaw Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.421052632
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.222.215384615
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Red Hot
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Red Hot that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.911.911111111
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.971.974358974
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Billowing Mirage (Blue) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.971.966666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Dustup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dustup (Yellow) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
1.581.578947368
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Spectral Prowler (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spectral Prowler (Blue) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
1.591.588235294
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Lava Burst that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Billowing Mirage (Yellow) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.921.916666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sweeping Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.472.470588235
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Blue) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Blue) that play both.
Thaw
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Thaw that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Yellow) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.531.533333333
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Embermaw Cenipai (Yellow) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Censor that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Critical Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Critical Strike (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Spectral Prowler (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spectral Prowler (Red) that play both.
Spectral Rider (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spectral Rider (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Burn Away
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Burn Away that play both.
Frightmare (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Frightmare (Red) that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Phantasmal Haze (Blue) that play both.
Searing Touch
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Searing Touch that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.072.071428571
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Flicker Trick that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.276315789
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.424242424
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.363636364
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.901.900000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sand Cover (Yellow) that play both.
Phantom Tidemaw
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Phantom Tidemaw that play both.
Prismatic Shield (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Prismatic Shield (Red) that play both.
Brush Off (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Brush Off (Red) that play both.
Prismatic Shield (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Prismatic Shield (Blue) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Blood of the Dracai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blood of the Dracai that play both.