Sand Cover (Blue)
Draconic Illusionist Instant
Target ash you control gains ward 2 until end of turn. (If your hero would be dealt damage, prevent 2 of that damage and destroy this.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.971.967531383
Average Defense Value:
2.652.654100385
Hero
Equipment
Silken Form
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Silken Form that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Bandana of the Blue Beyond
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Bandana of the Blue Beyond that play both.
Old Knocker
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Old Knocker that play both.
Silent Stilettos
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Deep Blue
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Wave of Reality
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Crown of Providence
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Sash of Sandikai
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sash of Sandikai that play both.
Ironhide Helm
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Dream Weavers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Diadem of Dreamstate
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Diadem of Dreamstate that play both.
Helio's Mitre
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Helio's Mitre that play both.
Mage Master Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Dominion
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Celestial Kimono
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Celestial Kimono that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ghostly Touch
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Crown of Reflection
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Ironhide Legs
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Seeker's Hood
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Seeker's Hood that play both.
Quelling Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Quelling Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Glory Seeker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Glory Seeker that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Calming Gesture
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Calming Cloak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Calming Cloak that play both.
Quelling Slippers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Quelling Slippers that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Storm of Sandikai
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Iris of Reality
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Iris of Reality that play both.
Action
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.392156863
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played:
2.152.149425287
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.102.096774194
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.072.065934066
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.202.202531646
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
1.961.957142857
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Dust from the Fertile Fields
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Fertile Fields that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.062.056338028
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.132.133333333
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Rake the Embers (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
1.871.868421053
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.042.044117647
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.052.051948052
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.072.071428571
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
2.032.027777778
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Themai that play both.
Dust from Stillwater Shrine
Avg. played:
2.142.142857143
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from Stillwater Shrine that play both.
Rake the Embers (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.022.020408163
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Rake the Embers (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.092.090909091
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Skittering Sands (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.022.018181818
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Skittering Sands (Blue) that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.592.593750000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
2.222.222222222
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Dust from the Shadow Crypts
Avg. played:
2.212.210526316
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Shadow Crypts that play both.
Dust from the Golden Plains
Avg. played:
2.202.200000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Golden Plains that play both.
Dust from the Red Desert
Avg. played:
2.062.055555556
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Red Desert that play both.
Sigil of Solitude (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sigil of Solitude (Red) that play both.
Solitary Companion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Solitary Companion (Red) that play both.
Emissary of Wind
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Emissary of Wind that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Skittering Sands (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.971.969696970
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Skittering Sands (Yellow) that play both.
Blessing of Vynserakai
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blessing of Vynserakai that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Haze Bending that play both.
Healing Balm (Red)
Avg. played:
1.451.450000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Healing Balm (Red) that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Blessing of Spirits (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blessing of Spirits (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Aeo
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Tome of Aeo that play both.
Uprising
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Uprising that play both.
Transmogrify (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Transmogrify (Red) that play both.
Transmogrify (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Transmogrify (Blue) that play both.
Tranquil Passing (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Tranquil Passing (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.182.178217822
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.301886792
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.162.157894737
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.271739130
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.204819277
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Embermaw Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.242.244444444
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Red Hot
Avg. played:
2.122.122448980
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Red Hot that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.971.966101695
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.042.039215686
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Billowing Mirage (Blue) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.052.052631579
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.042.044444444
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.442.437500000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.062.058823529
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
1.621.615384615
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Lava Burst that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.052.054054054
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sweeping Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Dustup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.411.409090909
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dustup (Yellow) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.831.827586207
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Billowing Mirage (Yellow) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
1.601.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Spectral Prowler (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spectral Prowler (Blue) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Red) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Breaking Point that play both.
Thaw
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Thaw that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Yellow) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Embermaw Cenipai (Yellow) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Blue) that play both.
Critical Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Critical Strike (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Spectral Prowler (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spectral Prowler (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.092.089552239
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Flicker Trick that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Instant
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.299065421
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.348837209
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.321428571
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.022.022727273
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sand Cover (Yellow) that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Bubble to the Surface
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Bubble to the Surface that play both.
Prismatic Shield (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Prismatic Shield (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Phantom Tidemaw
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Phantom Tidemaw that play both.
Resource
Blood of the Dracai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blood of the Dracai that play both.