Sand Cover (Blue)
Draconic Illusionist Instant
Target ash you control gains ward 2 until end of turn. (If your hero would be dealt damage, prevent 2 of that damage and destroy this.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.022.015363549
Average Defense Value:
2.652.647487097
Hero
Equipment
Silken Form
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Silken Form that play both.
Silent Stilettos
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Deep Blue
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Deep Blue that play both.
Wave of Reality
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Crown of Providence
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ironhide Helm
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Sash of Sandikai
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sash of Sandikai that play both.
Diadem of Dreamstate
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Diadem of Dreamstate that play both.
Dream Weavers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Helio's Mitre
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Helio's Mitre that play both.
Calming Gesture
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Crown of Dominion
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Celestial Kimono
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Celestial Kimono that play both.
Seeker's Hood
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Seeker's Hood that play both.
Mage Master Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ghostly Touch
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironhide Legs
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Quelling Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Quelling Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Crown of Reflection
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Grandstand Legplates
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Grandstand Legplates that play both.
Headliner Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Headliner Helm that play both.
Quelling Slippers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Quelling Slippers that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Weapon
Action
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.387096774
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played:
2.152.150000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Blessing of Vynserakai
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blessing of Vynserakai that play both.
Dust from the Fertile Fields
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Fertile Fields that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.062.060240964
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.012.012345679
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
1.891.888888889
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.142.144927536
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
1.791.787878788
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Rake the Embers (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.082.075471698
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Rake the Embers (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.022.016393443
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
1.711.714285714
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.042.041666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Burn Them All that play both.
Rake the Embers (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.981.977777778
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Rake the Embers (Yellow) that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
1.951.951612903
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Invoke Themai that play both.
Dust from Stillwater Shrine
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from Stillwater Shrine that play both.
Sigil of Solitude (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sigil of Solitude (Red) that play both.
Solitary Companion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Solitary Companion (Red) that play both.
Emissary of Wind
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Emissary of Wind that play both.
Skittering Sands (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.921.920000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Skittering Sands (Blue) that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.592.586206897
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Dust from the Shadow Crypts
Avg. played:
2.462.461538462
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Shadow Crypts that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Skittering Sands (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.901.903225806
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Skittering Sands (Yellow) that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Haze Bending that play both.
Healing Balm (Red)
Avg. played:
1.451.450000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Healing Balm (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Essence of Ancestry: Mind that play both.
Water the Seeds (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Water the Seeds (Blue) that play both.
Water the Seeds (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Water the Seeds (Red) that play both.
Water the Seeds (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Water the Seeds (Yellow) that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Blessing of Spirits (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blessing of Spirits (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Aeo
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Tome of Aeo that play both.
Dust from the Golden Plains
Avg. played:
2.562.555555556
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Golden Plains that play both.
Dust from the Red Desert
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dust from the Red Desert that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Lost in Thought that play both.
Dissolve Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dissolve Reality that play both.
Transmogrify (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Transmogrify (Red) that play both.
Uprising
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Uprising that play both.
Tranquil Passing (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Tranquil Passing (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sigil of Protection (Red) that play both.
Healing Balm (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Healing Balm (Yellow) that play both.
Transmogrify (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Transmogrify (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.285714286
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.162.163043478
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.132.127906977
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.182.181818182
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Embermaw Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.261904762
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.212.209876543
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Red Hot
Avg. played:
2.072.065217391
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Red Hot that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.911.907407407
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.022.022222222
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Billowing Mirage (Blue) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.052.054054054
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.362.357142857
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.981.979166667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
1.641.640000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Lava Burst that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sweeping Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.381.380952381
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Billowing Mirage (Yellow) that play both.
Dustup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.431.428571429
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dustup (Yellow) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
1.601.600000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Spectral Prowler (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spectral Prowler (Blue) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Red) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Yellow) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.561.562500000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Embermaw Cenipai (Yellow) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Blue) that play both.
Thaw
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Thaw that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Blue) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Breaking Point that play both.
Pay Up
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Pay Up that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Ripple Away that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Critical Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Critical Strike (Red) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Spectral Prowler (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Spectral Prowler (Red) that play both.
Frightmare (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Frightmare (Red) that play both.
Phantasmal Haze (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Phantasmal Haze (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Burn Away
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Burn Away that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.082.075757576
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Flicker Trick that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.295918367
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.365853659
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.981.976190476
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Sand Cover (Yellow) that play both.
Phantom Tidemaw
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Phantom Tidemaw that play both.
Prismatic Shield (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Prismatic Shield (Red) that play both.
Prismatic Shield (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Prismatic Shield (Blue) that play both.
Semblance
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Semblance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Blood of the Dracai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Blue) and Blood of the Dracai that play both.