Sand Cover (Red)
Draconic Illusionist Instant
Target ash you control gains ward 4 until end of turn. (If your hero would be dealt damage, prevent 4 of that damage and destroy this.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.961.955226597
Average Defense Value:
2.632.630220329
Hero
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Crown of Dominion
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Silken Form
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Silken Form that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Calming Gesture
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Crown of Providence
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Wave of Reality
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Ghostly Touch
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Mage Master Boots
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Old Knocker
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Balance of Justice
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Silent Stilettos
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Crown of Reflection
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Seeker's Leggings
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Seeker's Leggings that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Glory Seeker
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Glory Seeker that play both.
Ironhide Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Dream Weavers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Storm of Sandikai
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Action
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.782.775090805
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.736137667
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.772.773195876
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.772.774789591
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.772.774560295
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.802.798936170
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.792.785413597
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.782.783305133
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.602.595195014
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Burn Them All that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
1.881.879310345
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
2.422.419981975
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Themai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
1.991.985770430
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
2.532.528464861
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Lost in Thought that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
2.152.146144279
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.302.304985337
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
1.351.349621873
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.482.475938967
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Body
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Essence of Ancestry: Body that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Attack Action
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.674962774
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.686708486
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.822.815652926
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.596451830
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.752.746556967
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.596595868
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.642.638618840
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.696606038
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.492.492227979
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.756902932
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.746439628
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.497483444
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.282.281166464
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.324494949
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Embermaw Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
2.582.575746128
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.358152686
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.484175915
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.510032664
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.485938522
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.572.565345081
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Billowing Mirage (Blue) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.745701870
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.662.662490679
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played:
2.652.646907216
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.402.395953757
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Flicker Trick that play both.
Block
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.655551572
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.182.178289992
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.501.501410896
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Rake Over the Coals that play both.