Sand Cover (Red)
Draconic Illusionist Instant
Target ash you control gains ward 4 until end of turn. (If your hero would be dealt damage, prevent 4 of that damage and destroy this.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.961.955987663
Average Defense Value:
2.632.632285402
Hero
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Crown of Dominion
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Calming Gesture
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Silken Form
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Silken Form that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Balance of Justice
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Wave of Reality
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Ghostly Touch
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Mage Master Boots
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Silent Stilettos
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Crown of Reflection
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Seeker's Leggings
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Seeker's Leggings that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Glory Seeker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Glory Seeker that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironhide Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Deep Blue
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Nullrune Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Weapon
Storm of Sandikai
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Action
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.842.839091568
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.802.799442609
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.761167538
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.802.797460450
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.802.800292918
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.802.799600882
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.812.808264275
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.812.810175186
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
1.891.892446043
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.612.608719169
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
2.432.426808749
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Themai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
1.991.986560694
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
2.532.534846029
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Lost in Thought that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
2.152.150224695
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.342.341090214
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
1.351.348918761
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.472.473404255
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.542.537803138
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Attack Action
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.698533657
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.710899253
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.832.833970926
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.620004903
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.762.760098616
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.617986284
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.717770726
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.672.672463214
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.771914395
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.759682540
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.524165708
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.282.284550776
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
2.582.580670611
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.334106729
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Embermaw Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.373620863
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.517273576
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.342.341991342
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.522.520462205
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Billowing Mirage (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.495622896
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.767516887
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.682.676911076
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Flicker Trick that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.669426752
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.192.187396694
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.511.509365832
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
