Seeker's Mitts
Generic Equipment - Arms
Instant -- {r}, destroy Seeker's Mitts: Prevent the next 1 damage that would be dealt to your hero this turn. Opt 1 (Look at the top card of your deck. You may put it on the bottom.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.841.837239295
Average Defense Value: Β
2.512.511781823
Hero
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Crown of Providence that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Balance of Justice
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Dominion
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Ghostly Touch
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Mage Master Boots
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Silken Form
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Silken Form that play both.
Wave of Reality
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Wave of Reality that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Patch the Hole
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Patch the Hole that play both.
Cogwerx Tinker Rings
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Cogwerx Tinker Rings that play both.
Old Knocker
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Old Knocker that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Crown of Reflection
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Adaptive Dissolver
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Adaptive Dissolver that play both.
Calming Gesture
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Calming Gesture that play both.
Seeker's Leggings
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Seeker's Leggings that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Silent Stilettos
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Teklo Foundry Heart
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Teklo Foundry Heart that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Storm of Sandikai
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Spitfire
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Spitfire that play both.
Symbiosis Shot
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Symbiosis Shot that play both.
Action
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played: Β
2.892.888213283
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played: Β
2.892.889071295
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played: Β
2.892.889201878
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played: Β
2.892.887294118
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.881898971
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played: Β
2.882.883167355
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β
2.902.900262467
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played: Β
2.872.870985452
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Passing Mirage that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played: Β
2.722.718673219
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played: Β
1.901.898496241
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played: Β
2.692.685927307
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Themai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played: Β
2.042.036335404
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608165429
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Lost in Thought that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played: Β
2.232.225522552
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Burn Bare
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Burn Bare that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played: Β
2.632.633378933
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.572.573089701
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Boom Grenade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Boom Grenade (Red) that play both.
Ring of Roses
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Ring of Roses that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Dissolving Shield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dissolving Shield (Red) that play both.
Backup Protocol: RED
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Backup Protocol: RED that play both.
banned - Blitz
Hadron Collider (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Hadron Collider (Red) that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.843837003
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.862628448
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.882.880541163
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Command and Conquer that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.770965081
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.791155584
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.782.777391304
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.782.784681516
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
2.612.609756098
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.649337911
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
2.582.575043128
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played: Β
2.572.565642458
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Swift Shot that play both.
Sky Skimmer (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sky Skimmer (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.633245383
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Sprocket Rocket (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sprocket Rocket (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.504736130
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Data Link (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Data Link (Red) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Breaking Point that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Standing Order that play both.
Dive Through Data (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dive Through Data (Red) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Zero to Sixty (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.860093897
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.732.734221599
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689655172
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.682.678571429
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Flicker Trick that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.691133294
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.981.981356968
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.771.773369992
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Remembrance that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.142.140820981
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β
2.382.384615385
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Kindle that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β
2.452.454545455
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.