Seeker's Mitts
Generic Equipment - Arms
Instant -- {r}, destroy Seeker's Mitts: Prevent the next 1 damage that would be dealt to your hero this turn. Opt 1 (Look at the top card of your deck. You may put it on the bottom.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.841.838197874
Average Defense Value: Β
2.512.512104144
Hero
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Dromai, Ash Artist
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Dromai
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dromai that play both.
Scurv, Stowaway
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Crown of Providence that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Crown of Dominion
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Balance of Justice
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Ghostly Touch
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Mage Master Boots
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Silken Form
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Silken Form that play both.
Wave of Reality
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Wave of Reality that play both.
Helmsman's Peak
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Helmsman's Peak that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Crown of Reflection
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Old Knocker
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Old Knocker that play both.
Adaptive Dissolver
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Adaptive Dissolver that play both.
Calming Gesture
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Calming Gesture that play both.
Seeker's Leggings
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Seeker's Leggings that play both.
Blue Sea Tricorn
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Blue Sea Tricorn that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Silent Stilettos
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Teklo Foundry Heart
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Teklo Foundry Heart that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Storm of Sandikai
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Symbiosis Shot
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Symbiosis Shot that play both.
Action
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played: Β
2.892.887774148
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played: Β
2.892.888628919
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played: Β
2.892.888524590
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played: Β
2.892.886854460
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.881474568
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played: Β
2.882.882452739
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β
2.902.898822503
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played: Β
2.872.870375445
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Passing Mirage that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played: Β
2.722.718489456
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played: Β
1.901.897869674
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played: Β
2.692.685891473
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Themai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played: Β
2.042.036555143
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608488064
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Lost in Thought that play both.
Opal Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Opal Amulet that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played: Β
2.222.223561644
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Burn Bare
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Burn Bare that play both.
Sapphire Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sapphire Amulet that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Portside Exchange that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played: Β
2.632.629931973
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.572.573089701
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Boom Grenade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Boom Grenade (Red) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Dissolving Shield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dissolving Shield (Red) that play both.
Backup Protocol: RED
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Backup Protocol: RED that play both.
banned - Blitz
Hadron Collider (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Hadron Collider (Red) that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Boom Grenade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Boom Grenade (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.843978793
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.862273832
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.882.879666858
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Command and Conquer that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.771193416
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790967742
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.782.777700590
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.782.783573375
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.650708354
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
2.592.588235294
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
2.572.574468085
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played: Β
2.572.565550907
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.632411067
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Swift Shot that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sea Legs that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Swindler's Grift (Yellow) that play both.
Swindler's Grift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Swindler's Grift (Blue) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Sprocket Rocket (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sprocket Rocket (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.506775068
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Data Link (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Data Link (Red) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Breaking Point that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Standing Order that play both.
Dive Through Data (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dive Through Data (Red) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Zero to Sixty (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.859385985
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733053809
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β
2.712.705882353
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.612.611111111
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Flicker Trick that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.691068814
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.981.982600733
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.771.773636720
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Remembrance that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.142.141391106
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Kindle that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.