Seeker's Mitts
Generic Equipment - Arms
Instant -- {r}, destroy Seeker's Mitts: Prevent the next 1 damage that would be dealt to your hero this turn. Opt 1 (Look at the top card of your deck. You may put it on the bottom.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.831.834672574
Average Defense Value:
2.522.518155490
Hero
Dromai, Ash Artist
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Dromai
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dromai that play both.
Terra
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Terra that play both.
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Balance of Justice
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Providence
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Crown of Providence that play both.
Crown of Dominion
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Ghostly Touch
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Mage Master Boots
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Adaptive Dissolver
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Adaptive Dissolver that play both.
Wave of Reality
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Wave of Reality that play both.
Silken Form
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Silken Form that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Crown of Reflection
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Calming Gesture
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Calming Gesture that play both.
Seeker's Leggings
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Seeker's Leggings that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Silent Stilettos
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Teklo Foundry Heart
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Teklo Foundry Heart that play both.
Weapon
Storm of Sandikai
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Redwood Hammer
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Symbiosis Shot
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Symbiosis Shot that play both.
Action
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.892.892483349
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.892.893155259
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.892.893744031
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.892.886904762
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.892.891335567
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.892.886666667
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.912.905677246
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.882.875417130
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Passing Mirage that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.722.722027972
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
1.901.897894065
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
2.692.685822545
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Themai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
2.042.039498433
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
2.612.607843137
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Lost in Thought that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
2.232.228079911
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.632.627071823
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.572.572621035
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Boom Grenade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Boom Grenade (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and The Weakest Link that play both.
banned - Blitz
Hadron Collider (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Hadron Collider (Red) that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Dissolving Shield (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dissolving Shield (Red) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.849484536
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.867732158
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.892.886105447
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Command and Conquer that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.775287195
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.792945787
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.782.778325123
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.792.791649940
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.655483225
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
2.572.573512252
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.572.566171267
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.639455782
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.422.422222222
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Standing Order that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.510231924
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Breaking Point that play both.
Sprocket Rocket (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sprocket Rocket (Red) that play both.
Data Link (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Data Link (Red) that play both.
Dive Through Data (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Dive Through Data (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.862.864212288
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.742.739486814
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Flicker Trick that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.696016771
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
1.981.977950311
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.771.773607270
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Remembrance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.142.140625000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Kindle that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Resource
Will of Arcana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Seeker's Mitts and Will of Arcana that play both.