Silken Form
Draconic Illusionist Equipment - Arms
Instant - Destroy Silken Form: Transform target ash you control into an Aether Ashwing. (Create an Aether Ashwing token and put the ash under it.)
Quell 1 (If your hero would be dealt damage, you may pay {r} to prevent 1 of that damage. If you do, destroy Silken Form at the beginning of the end phase.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.941.938771524
Average Defense Value:
2.662.655172879
Hero
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Crown of Dominion
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Balance of Justice
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Providence
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Providence that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Calming Gesture
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Calming Gesture that play both.
Ghostly Touch
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Mage Master Boots
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Silent Stilettos
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Wave of Reality
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Wave of Reality that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Crown of Reflection
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Ironhide Helm
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Deep Blue
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Deep Blue that play both.
Glory Seeker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Glory Seeker that play both.
Ironhide Legs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Sash of Sandikai
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sash of Sandikai that play both.
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Dream Weavers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dream Weavers that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Weapon
Storm of Sandikai
99% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Action
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.812.806795733
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.732.732507814
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.673649025
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.722.722135385
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.732.730398732
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.732.734080552
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.742.739225913
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
1.881.881032548
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.712.705582973
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Passing Mirage that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.452.449167222
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
2.332.328340010
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Themai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
1.791.792194454
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
2.332.326213592
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Lost in Thought that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.362.355821235
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
2.042.044077135
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.542.543121150
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
1.421.420353982
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Energy Potion that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and The Weakest Link that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Dust from the Red Desert
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dust from the Red Desert that play both.
Dust from Stillwater Shrine
Avg. played:
1.491.490909091
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dust from Stillwater Shrine that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Rake the Embers (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake the Embers (Blue) that play both.
Rake the Embers (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake the Embers (Yellow) that play both.
Dust from the Fertile Fields
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dust from the Fertile Fields that play both.
Attack Action
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.622594490
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.532137519
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.792.790612245
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Command and Conquer that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.584578241
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.598845374
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.732.732816537
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.622.620115607
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.712.712930333
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.518894407
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.672670097
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.296749522
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Embermaw Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.321752862
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.696721311
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.452.447740758
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.492403932
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Standing Order that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.572.569620253
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
2.682.681506849
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
2.582.580867171
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.572.567944251
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Billowing Mirage (Blue) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Red Hot
Avg. played:
2.422.424344886
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Red Hot that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.494011976
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Lava Burst that play both.
Defense Reaction
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.615830116
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
2.152.147089397
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.232.232488823
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.441.435889278
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Remembrance that play both.
Semblance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Semblance that play both.