Silken Form
Draconic Illusionist Equipment - Arms
Instant - Destroy Silken Form: Transform target ash you control into an Aether Ashwing. (Create an Aether Ashwing token and put the ash under it.)
Quell 1 (If your hero would be dealt damage, you may pay {r} to prevent 1 of that damage. If you do, destroy Silken Form at the beginning of the end phase.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.921.921025424
Average Defense Value:
2.662.661107112
Hero
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Balance of Justice
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Dominion
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Crown of Providence
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Providence that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Ghostly Touch
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Mage Master Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Silent Stilettos
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Wave of Reality
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Wave of Reality that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Crown of Reflection
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Ironhide Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Deep Blue
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Deep Blue that play both.
Ironhide Legs
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Sash of Sandikai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sash of Sandikai that play both.
Dream Weavers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dream Weavers that play both.
Seeker's Leggings
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Seeker's Leggings that play both.
Glory Seeker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Glory Seeker that play both.
Weapon
Storm of Sandikai
99% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Action
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.892.885096154
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.782.776306993
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.725472888
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.762.763238629
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.772.772597913
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.782.776744186
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.782.778132118
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
1.891.893793986
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.732.732721202
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Passing Mirage that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.462.463115963
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
2.362.355381605
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Themai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
1.791.787663551
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
2.342.340958606
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Lost in Thought that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.402.399075501
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
2.062.059517426
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
1.421.418181818
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Energy Potion that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Dust from the Red Desert
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dust from the Red Desert that play both.
Rake the Embers (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake the Embers (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.668447517
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.822.816335444
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Command and Conquer that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.634183673
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.571785658
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.646186819
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.762.758164414
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.747831116
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.682.684939092
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.572384730
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.721481963
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.456268222
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.272.271084337
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Standing Order that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.331649058
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Embermaw Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.356368564
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.222.218295218
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.542.544369486
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.553260870
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.597173145
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.622.619084562
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Billowing Mirage (Blue) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
2.602.604559748
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Red Hot
Avg. played:
2.462.460641399
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Red Hot that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.528114664
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ripple Away that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Erase Face that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.737230341
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.682.675750577
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Flicker Trick that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.651128796
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
2.162.158186498
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.257011605
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.631.632217090
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Remembrance that play both.
Semblance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Semblance that play both.