Silken Form
Draconic Illusionist Equipment - Arms
Instant - Destroy Silken Form: Transform target ash you control into an Aether Ashwing. (Create an Aether Ashwing token and put the ash under it.)
Quell 1 (If your hero would be dealt damage, you may pay {r} to prevent 1 of that damage. If you do, destroy Silken Form at the beginning of the end phase.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.941.942269014
Average Defense Value: Β
2.652.652778064
Hero
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Crown of Dominion
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Old Knocker
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Old Knocker that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ghostly Touch
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Balance of Justice
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Balance of Justice that play both.
Mage Master Boots
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Silent Stilettos
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Calming Gesture
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Calming Gesture that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Wave of Reality
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Wave of Reality that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Crown of Reflection
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Ironhide Helm
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Glory Seeker
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Glory Seeker that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Deep Blue
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Deep Blue that play both.
Ironhide Legs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Sash of Sandikai
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sash of Sandikai that play both.
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Dream Weavers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dream Weavers that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Storm of Sandikai
99% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Action
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played: Β
2.712.707412807
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.648215210
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played: Β
2.702.698742421
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played: Β
2.712.705735093
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played: Β
2.712.709310345
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β
2.752.751460983
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played: Β
2.722.717536642
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689872490
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Passing Mirage that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played: Β
1.871.869246862
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played: Β
2.442.442753804
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played: Β
2.322.318658281
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Themai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played: Β
1.801.800257525
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played: Β
2.332.328807242
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played: Β
2.332.328153565
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Lost in Thought that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played: Β
2.042.042148362
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.542.543778802
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
1.421.420704846
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Energy Potion that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Dust from the Red Desert
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dust from the Red Desert that play both.
Rake the Embers (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake the Embers (Blue) that play both.
Rake the Embers (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake the Embers (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.598945609
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.511653995
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.562500000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.575994215
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.772.773867393
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.712.713267813
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
2.332.331210191
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.582.583812654
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.692746114
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.494977903
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.656521739
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.283802817
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Embermaw Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.312.310037175
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.678909953
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.464431725
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played: Β
2.442.439565217
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.550739958
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β
2.652.654867257
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
2.572.572449643
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.546946815
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Billowing Mirage (Blue) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Red Hot
Avg. played: Β
2.402.403741231
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Red Hot that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Standing Order that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Lava Burst that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.478178368
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.667568203
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.622.618613861
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β
2.472.466367713
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.352.354285714
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Block
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600197017
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.142.143768948
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.358507530
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.431.434173669
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Remembrance that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β
2.332.325581395
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Semblance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Semblance that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.