Silken Form
Draconic Illusionist Equipment - Arms
Instant - Destroy Silken Form: Transform target ash you control into an Aether Ashwing. (Create an Aether Ashwing token and put the ash under it.)
Quell 1 (If your hero would be dealt damage, you may pay {r} to prevent 1 of that damage. If you do, destroy Silken Form at the beginning of the end phase.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.941.938966654
Average Defense Value: Β
2.652.652481549
Hero
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Crown of Dominion
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ghostly Touch
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Mage Master Boots
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Balance of Justice that play both.
Silent Stilettos
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Old Knocker
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Old Knocker that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Calming Gesture
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Calming Gesture that play both.
Wave of Reality
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Wave of Reality that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Crown of Reflection
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Ironhide Helm
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Glory Seeker
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Glory Seeker that play both.
Deep Blue
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Deep Blue that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Ironhide Legs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Sash of Sandikai
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sash of Sandikai that play both.
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Dream Weavers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dream Weavers that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Storm of Sandikai
99% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Action
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played: Β
2.712.705446912
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.646974798
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played: Β
2.702.696681416
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played: Β
2.702.703496190
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played: Β
2.712.707087862
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746746747
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played: Β
2.722.716187096
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played: Β
2.692.686387965
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Passing Mirage that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played: Β
2.442.443665437
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Burn Them All that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played: Β
1.871.866494845
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played: Β
2.322.318714376
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Themai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played: Β
1.811.807039797
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played: Β
2.332.327545383
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played: Β
2.332.329729730
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Lost in Thought that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played: Β
2.042.042639352
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.542.543877551
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
1.421.419230769
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Energy Potion that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Dust from the Red Desert
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dust from the Red Desert that play both.
Rake the Embers (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake the Embers (Blue) that play both.
Rake the Embers (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake the Embers (Yellow) that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.598276518
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.511187608
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.561398640
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.575153156
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.772.771801767
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.712.710717750
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.582.583081571
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
2.372.371134021
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.690151710
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.493534911
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.655014789
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.285614768
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Embermaw Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.312.309312639
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.679007483
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.462596037
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played: Β
2.442.436801376
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β
2.662.656679151
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.551181102
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
2.572.570051414
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.546405229
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Billowing Mirage (Blue) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Red Hot
Avg. played: Β
2.402.401847575
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Red Hot that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Standing Order that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Lava Burst that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.476459510
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.665506439
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.622.617267032
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β
2.532.525362319
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.352.354838710
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Block
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.599165508
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.142.143935819
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.357892387
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.431.431874229
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Remembrance that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β
2.352.346666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Semblance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Semblance that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Silken Form and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.