On the Horizon (Red)
Generic Block
When this defends, look at the top card of your deck.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.832.831715260
Average Defense Value: Β
2.542.542439281
Hero
Olympia, Prized Fighter
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Marlynn
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Marlynn that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Hood
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Sealace Sarong
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Ironsong Versus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Prized Galea
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Refraction Bolters
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
New Horizon
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and New Horizon that play both.
Quiver of Rustling Leaves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Quiver of Rustling Leaves that play both.
Buccaneer's Bounty
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Glidewell Fins
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Glidewell Fins that play both.
Weapon
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Teklo Leveler
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Teklo Leveler that play both.
Action
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Call in the Big Guns (Red) that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Memory
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Memory that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Singularity
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Singularity that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Truce that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Avast Ye! that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Processor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Processor that play both.
Big Game Trophy Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Big Game Trophy Shot that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.742.744680851
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Ripple Away that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.517241379
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.521739130
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.787234043
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.772.768421053
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Firewall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Firewall (Red) that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555555556
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both On the Horizon (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.