Tome of Firebrand
Draconic Generic Instant
Play Tome of Firebrand only if you control 4 or more Draconic chain links.
Draw 2 cards.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.332.330270535
Average Defense Value:
2.272.272529690
Hero
Fai, Rising Rebellion
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Fai
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fai that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Dromai, Ash Artist
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Dromai
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dromai that play both.
Equipment
Dragonscaler Flight Path
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Mask of Momentum
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Tide Flippers
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tide Flippers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Dominion
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Heat Wave
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Heat Wave that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Silken Form
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Silken Form that play both.
Flick Knives
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Flick Knives that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Sash of Sandikai
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sash of Sandikai that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Calming Gesture
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Calming Gesture that play both.
Pouncing Paws
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Crown of Providence that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Spell Fray Cloak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Spell Fray Cloak that play both.
Nullrune Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Weapon
Searing Emberblade
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Searing Emberblade that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Kunai of Retribution
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Storm of Sandikai
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Action
Rise from the Ashes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.643564356
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rise from the Ashes (Red) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.702.704081633
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.502.498349835
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.661064426
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Uprising
Avg. played:
2.462.456018519
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Uprising that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Rise from the Ashes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.625000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rise from the Ashes (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Energy Potion that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.582.575645756
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.521.523404255
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Attack Action
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.762.762908325
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Ignite
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ignite that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.785842831
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Display Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Display Loyalty that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.785891089
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.777348777
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
2.692.691564713
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Lava Burst that play both.
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Avg. played:
2.902.895833333
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Art of the Dragon: Blood that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
2.682.684604905
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.751322751
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.762.759259259
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.770216173
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Spreading Flames
Avg. played:
2.712.714072971
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Spreading Flames that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
2.372.371157071
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.717481359
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.726804124
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.720906282
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rising Resentment (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.697544643
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Form
Avg. played:
2.732.727832512
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Phoenix Form that play both.
Blood Runs Deep
Avg. played:
2.612.612500000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blood Runs Deep that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:
2.082.082706767
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Salt the Wound that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.351.351955307
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tenacity that play both.
Demonstrate Devotion
Avg. played:
2.492.487500000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Demonstrate Devotion that play both.
Inflame
Avg. played:
2.602.598455598
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Inflame that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.702.702619414
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Avg. played:
2.552.545454545
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Art of the Dragon: Fire that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.752.747591522
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.668539326
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ronin Renegade (Blue) that play both.
Cinderskin Devotion (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.742.740343348
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Cinderskin Devotion (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.681528662
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played:
2.292.285919540
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Breaking Point that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.692.691441441
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Command and Conquer that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.732.730582524
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played:
2.302.296108291
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Double Strike that play both.
Soaring Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.589632829
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Soaring Strike (Red) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Rise Up
Avg. played:
2.422.418181818
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rise Up that play both.
Engulfing Flamewave (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.472422062
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Engulfing Flamewave (Red) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.631410256
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rising Resentment (Yellow) that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.573913043
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Red Hot
Avg. played:
2.492.488673139
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Red Hot that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Scale
Avg. played:
2.542.541666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Art of the Dragon: Scale that play both.
Mounting Anger (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mounting Anger (Blue) that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.558232932
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Belittle (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Stoke the Flames
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Stoke the Flames that play both.
Attack Reaction
Throw Dagger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:
2.632.631644005
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Defense Reaction
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played:
2.862.858823529
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.768691589
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.782.781725888
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Art of War that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played:
2.662.659574468
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Bubble to the Surface
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Bubble to the Surface that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Blood of the Dracai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blood of the Dracai that play both.