Tome of Firebrand
Draconic Generic Instant
Play Tome of Firebrand only if you control 4 or more Draconic chain links.
Draw 2 cards.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.322.319656012
Average Defense Value:
2.262.255665879
Hero
Fai, Rising Rebellion
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
Fai
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fai that play both.
Dromai, Ash Artist
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Dromai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dromai that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Mask of Momentum
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tide Flippers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Calming Gesture
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Calming Gesture that play both.
Crown of Dominion
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Heat Wave
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Heat Wave that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Silken Form
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Silken Form that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Sash of Sandikai
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sash of Sandikai that play both.
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Pouncing Paws
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Crown of Providence
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Crown of Providence that play both.
Spell Fray Cloak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Spell Fray Cloak that play both.
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Silent Stilettos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Weapon
Searing Emberblade
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Searing Emberblade that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Storm of Sandikai
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Action
Rise from the Ashes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.642574257
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rise from the Ashes (Red) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.672.673728814
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.792.789699571
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Dust from the Fertile Fields
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dust from the Fertile Fields that play both.
Uprising
Avg. played:
2.452.445497630
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Uprising that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Call to the Grave that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Chorus of the Amphitheater (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Chorus of the Amphitheater (Red) that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.620915033
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Rise from the Ashes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.622.622950820
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rise from the Ashes (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.622.621818182
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Energy Potion that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.462.461538462
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and The Weakest Link that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.521.523404255
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.532.533039648
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Attack Action
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.752.746285714
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.772030651
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.773114754
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.763426241
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
2.692.686689420
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Lava Burst that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
2.682.680276817
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.751152074
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.769106999
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
2.382.380952381
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Spreading Flames
Avg. played:
2.712.707561728
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Spreading Flames that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.718801997
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.713644524
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tenacity that play both.
Rising Resentment (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.720286885
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rising Resentment (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.700455581
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Form
Avg. played:
2.732.731288344
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Phoenix Form that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:
2.082.081285444
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Salt the Wound that play both.
Inflame
Avg. played:
2.602.595578674
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Inflame that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played:
2.712.705882353
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.707070707
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.752.752475248
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.666041276
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ronin Renegade (Blue) that play both.
Cinderskin Devotion (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.745689655
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Cinderskin Devotion (Blue) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.732.728365385
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.692.690531178
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Command and Conquer that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played:
2.302.298482293
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Double Strike that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played:
2.282.276995305
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Breaking Point that play both.
Soaring Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.593952484
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Soaring Strike (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.637717122
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Engulfing Flamewave (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.469879518
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Engulfing Flamewave (Red) that play both.
Rise Up
Avg. played:
2.422.418666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rise Up that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.572649573
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.632.634228188
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rising Resentment (Yellow) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.592592593
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Red Hot
Avg. played:
2.482.480968858
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Red Hot that play both.
Mounting Anger (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mounting Anger (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.558232932
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Belittle (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Stoke the Flames
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Stoke the Flames that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.764277035
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.772.765724704
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Art of War that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Blood of the Dracai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blood of the Dracai that play both.