Tome of Firebrand
Draconic Generic Instant
Play Tome of Firebrand only if you control 4 or more Draconic chain links.
Draw 2 cards.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.322.318703834
Average Defense Value:
2.262.259020382
Hero
Fai, Rising Rebellion
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
New
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Fai
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fai that play both.
Dromai, Ash Artist
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Dromai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dromai that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Mask of Momentum
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tide Flippers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Dominion
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Heat Wave
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Heat Wave that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Silken Form
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Silken Form that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Sash of Sandikai
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sash of Sandikai that play both.
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Calming Gesture
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Calming Gesture that play both.
Pouncing Paws
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Crown of Providence
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Crown of Providence that play both.
Spell Fray Cloak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Spell Fray Cloak that play both.
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Silent Stilettos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Weapon
Searing Emberblade
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Searing Emberblade that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Storm of Sandikai
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Action
Rise from the Ashes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.642220020
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rise from the Ashes (Red) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.672.669322709
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.792.790598291
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Dust from the Fertile Fields
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dust from the Fertile Fields that play both.
Uprising
Avg. played:
2.452.449883450
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Uprising that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.623824451
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Rise from the Ashes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.622.622516556
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rise from the Ashes (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.642.636363636
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Energy Potion that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.542.535564854
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Burn Them All that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.521.523404255
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and The Weakest Link that play both.
Attack Action
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.752.748735245
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.774050633
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.775828460
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.765182186
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
2.692.688768606
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Lava Burst that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
2.682.679752066
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.750957854
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.769106999
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
2.382.376836158
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Spreading Flames
Avg. played:
2.712.707241911
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Spreading Flames that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.718672199
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.716829920
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Tenacity that play both.
Rising Resentment (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.721025641
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rising Resentment (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.701254276
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Form
Avg. played:
2.732.729397294
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Phoenix Form that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:
2.082.084280303
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Salt the Wound that play both.
Inflame
Avg. played:
2.602.596879064
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Inflame that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.702.704318937
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.752.750491159
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.666041276
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ronin Renegade (Blue) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played:
2.712.705882353
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Cinderskin Devotion (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.745140389
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Cinderskin Devotion (Blue) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.732.731884058
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.692.692660550
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Command and Conquer that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played:
2.292.294416244
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Double Strike that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played:
2.282.277519380
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Breaking Point that play both.
Soaring Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.593073593
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Soaring Strike (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.635491607
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Rise Up
Avg. played:
2.412.413793103
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rise Up that play both.
Engulfing Flamewave (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.469879518
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Engulfing Flamewave (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.573913043
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.642.637583893
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Rising Resentment (Yellow) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.597122302
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Red Hot
Avg. played:
2.482.479452055
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Red Hot that play both.
Mounting Anger (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Mounting Anger (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.558232932
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Belittle (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Stoke the Flames
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Stoke the Flames that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:
2.632.630790191
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Maul
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Maul that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.765492102
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.772.767567568
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Art of War that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Blood of the Dracai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Firebrand and Blood of the Dracai that play both.