Nasty Surprise
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When an opponent's effect puts this into your graveyard from anywhere, create an Agility, Might, and Vigor token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.452.454197203
Average Defense Value: Β
2.612.609720565
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔi
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Fai, Rising Rebellion
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Nullrune Boots
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Crown of Providence that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Heavy Industry Ram Stop
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Heavy Industry Ram Stop that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Balance of Justice
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Balance of Justice that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Mask of Momentum
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Mask of Momentum that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Tide Flippers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Tide Flippers that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Hood
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Refraction Bolters
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Spell Fray Cloak
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Spell Fray Cloak that play both.
Face Purgatory
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Face Purgatory that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Prized Galea
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Prized Galea that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Well Grounded
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Well Grounded that play both.
Arcane Lantern
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Ironsong Versus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Weapon
Searing Emberblade
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Searing Emberblade that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hatchet of Body
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Teklo Plasma Pistol
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Teklo Plasma Pistol that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.682.680115274
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Spoils of War that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Spill Blood that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.762.755102041
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Truce that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.642.643636364
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and The Weakest Link that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β
2.772.768888889
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Unsheathed that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Germinate that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.602.595794393
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and This Round's on Me that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Cerebellum Processor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Cerebellum Processor that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played: Β
2.492.489795918
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Cleave that play both.
Spark of Genius
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Spark of Genius that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Commanding Performance that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Double Down that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.762.760585468
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.832.832436587
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Lava Burst that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Salt the Wound that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
2.142.143399810
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Ripple Away that play both.
Spreading Flames
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Spreading Flames that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β
1.631.625199362
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Tenacity that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β
1.431.427018634
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Plow Under that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Double Strike that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
2.522.523178808
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Fast and Furious
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Fast and Furious that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β
2.442.442542787
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Standing Order that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Amnesia that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Splatter Skull that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Blade Flurry that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.502013423
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
2.632.631578947
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.612.613107822
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Up the Ante that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Rout that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.849183075
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.802.803724928
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
2.722.719275550
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Hold the Line that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.290196078
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
2.412.406438632
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and That All You Got? that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.783783784
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.774774775
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Art of War that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.441860465
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Take it on the Chin that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.712643678
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.659877800
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Remembrance that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Stir the Pot that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Pass Over that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nasty Surprise and Heart of Fyendal that play both.