Take the Bait
Ranger Action
Riptide Specialization
Search your deck for a card, then shuffle and put it on top.
Create a Bait token under an opponent's control.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.292.292954252
Average Defense Value: Β
2.682.676298872
Hero
Riptide
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Riptide that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Equipment
Trench of Sunken Treasure
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
New Horizon
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and New Horizon that play both.
Sharp Shooters
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Sealace Sarong
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Driftwood Quiver
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Driftwood Quiver that play both.
Nullrune Boots
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Aurum Aegis
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Longdraw Half-Glove
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Longdraw Half-Glove that play both.
Flight Path
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Flight Path that play both.
Skullbone Crosswrap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Skullbone Crosswrap that play both.
Perch Grapplers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Quiver of Rustling Leaves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Quiver of Rustling Leaves that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Arcane Lantern
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Weapon
Sandscour Greatbow
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Sandscour Greatbow that play both.
Dreadbore
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Dreadbore that play both.
Barbed Castaway
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Barbed Castaway that play both.
Redspine Manta
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Redspine Manta that play both.
Flail of Agony
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Flail of Agony that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
2.892.893548387
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Lace with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β
2.872.866454690
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Lace with Bloodrot that play both.
Murky Water
Avg. played: Β
2.902.896610169
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Murky Water that play both.
Seek and Destroy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Seek and Destroy that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β
2.892.894179894
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Premeditate that play both.
Line It Up
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Line It Up that play both.
Dead Eye
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Dead Eye that play both.
Release the Tension (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Release the Tension (Red) that play both.
Plan for the Worst
Avg. played: Β
2.742.737827715
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Plan for the Worst that play both.
Read the Glide Path (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Read the Glide Path (Red) that play both.
Lace with Inertia
Avg. played: Β
2.752.754464286
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Lace with Inertia that play both.
Lace with Frailty
Avg. played: Β
2.742.736111111
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Lace with Frailty that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Drop the Anchor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Drop the Anchor that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Germinate that play both.
Point the Tip (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Point the Tip (Red) that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Arc Lightning that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Raise an Army that play both.
Ice Eternal
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Ice Eternal that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Show Time! that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Trot Along that play both.
Attack Action
Endless Arrow
Avg. played: Β
2.862.859130435
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Endless Arrow that play both.
Stone Rain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Stone Rain that play both.
Intoxicating Shot
Avg. played: Β
2.882.878524946
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Intoxicating Shot that play both.
Remorseless
Avg. played: Β
2.822.818918919
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Remorseless that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
Heat Seeker
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Heat Seeker that play both.
Drill Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.482142857
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Drill Shot (Red) that play both.
Immobilizing Shot
Avg. played: Β
2.802.804054054
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Immobilizing Shot that play both.
Infecting Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Infecting Shot (Red) that play both.
Drill Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Drill Shot (Blue) that play both.
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Swift Shot that play both.
Falcon Wing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Falcon Wing (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Infecting Shot (Blue) that play both.
Widowmaker (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Widowmaker (Blue) that play both.
Battering Bolt
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733009709
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Battering Bolt that play both.
Dry Powder Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Dry Powder Shot that play both.
Searing Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Searing Shot (Red) that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Bolt'n' Shot (Yellow) that play both.
Barbed Undertow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Barbed Undertow that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.662.662650602
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and The Golden Son that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.422.422360248
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Bolt'n' Shot (Blue) that play both.
Endless Winter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Endless Winter that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Crippling Crush that play both.
Murkmire Grapnel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Murkmire Grapnel (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Bet Big that play both.
Attack Reaction
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Tarpit Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.842.839673913
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Tarpit Trap that play both.
Boulder Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.772.765734266
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Boulder Trap that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.672.668903803
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608478803
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Inertia Trap that play both.
Pitfall Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.642.638513514
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Pitfall Trap that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.595070423
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.732.731182796
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.542.535000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Tripwire Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.582.584507042
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Tripwire Trap that play both.
Chain Reaction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Chain Reaction that play both.
Pendulum Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.562.557971014
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Pendulum Trap that play both.
Rockslide Trap
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Rockslide Trap that play both.
Block
Return Fire
Avg. played: Β
2.812.814371257
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Return Fire that play both.
Instant
Memorial Ground (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Memorial Ground (Red) that play both.
Feign Death
Avg. played: Β
1.381.376470588
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Feign Death that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Remembrance that play both.
Rain Razors
Avg. played: Β
2.442.437500000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Rain Razors that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.588709677
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Plague Hive that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Take the Bait and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.