Bigger Than Big (Red)
Guardian Action - Aura
At the start of your turn, destroy this, then your next Guardian attack this turn gets +5{p} and "When this attacks a hero, you may wager a Might token with them." (When the chain link resolves, if the attack hit, you create a Might token, otherwise they create one.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.184.179222978
Average Defense Value: Β
2.642.642744761
Hero
Betsy
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Betsy that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Equipment
Good Time Chapeau
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Civic Steps
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Tectonic Plating
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Nullrune Boots
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Craterhoof
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Stand Ground
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Stand Ground that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Crater Fist
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Arcane Lantern
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Nullrune Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Vigor Girth
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Base of the Mountain
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Gauntlet of Boulderhold
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Gauntlet of Boulderhold that play both.
Bastion of Duty
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Mage Master Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Testament of Valahai
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Testament of Valahai that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
High Riser
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and High Riser that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729268293
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.530536706
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.458776596
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.732.726858877
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.662.656432749
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.392.391836735
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.384068279
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.470892626
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Big Bop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.429687500
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Big Bop (Blue) that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.702.698198198
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.354211663
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Truce that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Leave a Dent that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Talk a Big Game that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Midas Touch that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Stamp Authority
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Stamp Authority that play both.
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Earthlore Empowerment (Red) that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Promising Terrain that play both.
Overswing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Overswing (Blue) that play both.
Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Visit Anvilheim
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Visit Anvilheim that play both.
Attack Action
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.782.778270510
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.702.704589528
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.601876676
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.712.712880143
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.589285714
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.698308271
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714427861
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.586975914
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.752.749136939
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.611518325
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.627753304
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.420998981
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.425925926
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.391907514
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.395092025
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727272727
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547554348
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.362012987
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.501295337
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.368248773
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.481927711
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Grind Them Down (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Grind Them Down (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.578088578
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
2.642.635883905
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.602.599489796
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.419847328
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.406250000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.407523511
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Colossal Bearing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Colossal Bearing that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Crush Confidence (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.483271375
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Over the Top (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Over the Top (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Clash of Mountains (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Clash of Mountains (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.504209542
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.438799076
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Lunging Press that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.651661308
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.612.605263158
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.526992288
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Solid Ground
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Solid Ground that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.482.480739599
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Seismic Eruption
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Seismic Eruption that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Bigger Than Big (Red) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.