banner
Lead with Heart (Red)
2595 decks (0.4597%)
Price History
Lead with Heart (Red)
Guardian,warrior Action
Your next Guardian or Warrior attack this turn gets +3{p}. Create a Vigor token. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.622.615876451
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.612.613693107
Hero
Olympia
Olympia
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Olympia that play both.
Terra
Terra
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Terra that play both.
Betsy
Betsy
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Betsy that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Stand Ground
Stand Ground
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Stand Ground that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
Helm of Halo's Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
New
Tremorshield Sabatons
Tremorshield Sabatons
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
Gauntlet of Might
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Deep Blue
Deep Blue
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Weapon
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Dawnblade that play both.
Merciless Battleaxe
Merciless Battleaxe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Merciless Battleaxe that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Action
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714912281
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.588014981
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.565217391
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.530424799
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642215569
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.734406439
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.669902913
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.557432432
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.511437908
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.539655172
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.474226804
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.452380952
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619617225
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Spill Blood
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.653333333
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.570048309
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Cleave
Cleave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Cleave that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.480984340
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.531615925
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
New
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.445595855
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.489637306
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Lead with Heart (Yellow) that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Blue)
Sharpen Steel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Blue) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
New
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.489285714
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.746478873
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.635563380
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.507812500
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.612419700
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.634529148
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.610552764
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.511415525
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600574713
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.453551913
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.503267974
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Thump (Red)
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.498233216
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.488970588
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Provoke that play both.
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826086957
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.724783862
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.784411277
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.429809359
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
New
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.643181818
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.529166667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.420654912
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.384823848
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.517241379
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Rout that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.589235127
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.772727273
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.523364486
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Saving Grace
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Saving Grace that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.491349481
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Slap-Happy
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.539130435
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.