Lead with Heart (Red)
Guardian,warrior Action
Your next Guardian or Warrior attack this turn gets +3{p}.
Create a Vigor token.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.622.622656817
Average Defense Value: Β
2.622.618855267
Hero
Olympia
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Olympia that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Betsy
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Betsy that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Terra
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Terra that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Prized Galea
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Hood
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Craterhoof
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Civic Steps
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Tectonic Plating
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Gallantry Gold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Old Knocker
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Ironsong Versus
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Vigor Girth
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Richter Scale
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Richter Scale that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Stand Ground
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Stand Ground that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Crater Fist
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Beckon Applause
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Flat Trackers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Deep Blue
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Weapon
Decimator Great Axe
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Anothos
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Hot Streak
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Dawnblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Dawnblade that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Merciless Battleaxe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Merciless Battleaxe that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hatchet of Body
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Action
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600997506
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729537367
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.572217111
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.542.539235412
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.652.645074224
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.559193955
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742268041
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.672.668393782
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.526243094
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.558867362
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.544615385
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.487841945
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Promising Terrain that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Leave a Dent that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.468852459
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.532513181
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.582822086
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Cleave that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.478515625
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.622.621103118
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.540772532
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.452.453488372
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.497641509
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Lead with Heart (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Lead with Heart (Yellow) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.503267974
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Fault Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Fault Line that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.632621951
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.511954993
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.619850187
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.645875252
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.612691466
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.508910891
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600529101
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.477218225
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.495440729
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.515625000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.506329114
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Attack Reaction
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.842.837398374
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.742.740310078
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.446085672
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.658634538
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.536971831
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.415929204
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.408551069
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.518624642
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.602469136
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.542.539325843
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.502.496913580
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β
2.562.563197026
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
1.401.400000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Heart (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.