High Riser
Guardian Weapon - Hammer (1h)
Once per Turn Action -- {r}{r}{r}: Attack
If you've drawn a card this turn, this gets +1{p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.044.036614568
Average Defense Value: Β
2.562.559618637
Hero
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Valda Brightaxe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Victor Goldmane
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Good Time Chapeau
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Stand Ground
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Stand Ground that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Vigor Girth
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Vigor Girth that play both.
Richter Scale
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Richter Scale that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Civic Steps
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Civic Steps that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Gauntlet of Boulderhold
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Gauntlet of Boulderhold that play both.
Crater Fist
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Boots
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Tectonic Plating
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Bloodied Oval
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Aurum Aegis
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Crown of Providence
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Crown of Providence that play both.
Craterhoof
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Craterhoof that play both.
Base of the Mountain
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Hoarding of Denial
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Hoarding of Denial that play both.
Golden Glare
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Golden Glare that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Bastion of Duty
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Civic Peak
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Civic Peak that play both.
Mage Master Boots
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Light Fingers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Light Fingers that play both.
Quick Clicks
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Quick Clicks that play both.
Crown of Dominion
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Titan's Fist that play both.
Action
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Promising Terrain that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Draw a Crowd
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Draw a Crowd that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.424342105
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.322.323275862
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Leave a Dent that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.331683168
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.383177570
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.312.306878307
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714285714
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Surface Shaking that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Big Bop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.331288344
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Big Bop (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.396103896
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.297520661
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.542.537974684
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Tear Asunder that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and This Round's on Me that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Geyser of Seismic Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Visit Anvilheim
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Visit Anvilheim that play both.
Daily Grind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Daily Grind that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.642.642105263
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Double Down that play both.
Stacked in Your Favor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Stacked in Your Favor (Blue) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Flying High (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Flying High (Yellow) that play both.
Tectonic Rift
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Tectonic Rift that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.412.411764706
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Truce that play both.
Potion of Luck
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Potion of Luck that play both.
Sift (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Sift (Red) that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Blessing of Deliverance (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and The Weakest Link that play both.
Seismic Stir (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Seismic Stir (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Cash In that play both.
Attack Action
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.742.741379310
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.287671233
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.321585903
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.292.285714286
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.278606965
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Fault Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Fault Line that play both.
Hostile Encroachment
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Hostile Encroachment that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.252.247252747
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.464730290
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.312.311475410
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.331288344
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.392.394444444
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Cranial Crush that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.252.248275862
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.582.581005587
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Bet Big that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.412.410404624
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Spinal Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.352564103
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.459302326
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.358620690
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.446666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.315789474
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.369747899
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Headbutt that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Annexation of All Things Known
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Annexation of All Things Known that play both.
Pec Perfect
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Pec Perfect that play both.
Captain of the Guard
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Captain of the Guard that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.614678899
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.385321101
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Over the Top (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.340000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Over the Top (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Thunk (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Over the Top (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Over the Top (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.385416667
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.420000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and The Golden Son that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Wallop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wallop (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.440860215
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Sea Legs that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Mangle that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.541.539325843
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Pulverize that play both.
Wage Gold (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wage Gold (Yellow) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
2.462.455696203
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Primed to Fight that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Vigorous Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wallop (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wallop (Yellow) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wage Might (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Wage Vigor (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Boulder Drop that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Smack of Reality
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Smack of Reality that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Command and Conquer that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Disable (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Thunk (Yellow) that play both.
Concuss (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Concuss (Yellow) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Crush Confidence (Blue) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.425373134
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Lunging Press that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.484848485
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.456140351
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.402.395348837
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Fool's Gold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Fool's Gold that play both.
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both High Riser and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.