banner
Lead with Power (Red)
1164 decks (0.3720%)
Price History
Lead with Power (Red)
Guardian,brute Action
Your next Brute or Guardian attack this turn gets +3{p}. Create a Might token. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
4.154.149219474
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.632.626272769
Hero
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Betsy
Betsy
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Betsy that play both.
Rhinar
Rhinar
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rhinar that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Kayo
Kayo
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Kayo that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
Gauntlet of Might
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
Barkbone Strapping
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
Gambler's Gloves
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Beaten Trackers
Beaten Trackers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Stand Ground
Stand Ground
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Stand Ground that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Knucklehead
Knucklehead
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Monstrous Veil
Monstrous Veil
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Monstrous Veil that play both.
Raw Meat
Raw Meat
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Raw Meat that play both.
Aurum Aegis
Aurum Aegis
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
Anothos
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Romping Club
Romping Club
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Romping Club that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Ball Breaker
Ball Breaker
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Ball Breaker that play both.
Rok
Rok
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rok that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.794520548
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.650406504
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.626139818
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.621621622
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.543726236
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.542635659
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Argh... Smash! that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Talk a Big Game that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.481675393
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.468354430
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.525316456
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Double Down that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
Rolling Thunder
Rolling Thunder
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rolling Thunder that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.749419954
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.711340206
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.806853583
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.802547771
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.696875000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.789285714
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.616071429
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.672297297
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.740310078
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.712062257
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.593023256
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.587234043
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.678756477
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Show No Mercy
Show No Mercy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Show No Mercy that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506172840
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.567441860
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.626315789
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.549222798
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.504807692
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.451086957
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Red)
Smash Instinct (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.583333333
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smash Instinct (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Skull Crack
Skull Crack
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Skull Crack that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.471830986
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Rawhide Rumble (Red)
Rawhide Rumble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rawhide Rumble (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
The Golden Son
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and The Golden Son that play both.
Predatory Assault (Red)
Predatory Assault (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Predatory Assault (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.592342342
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.469273743
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.760667904
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.743661972
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.281853282
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.620481928
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.450495050
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.