Lead with Power (Red)
Guardian,brute Action
Your next Brute or Guardian attack this turn gets +3{p}.
Create a Might token.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
4.094.085147615
Average Defense Value: Β
2.612.609444842
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔi
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Terra
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Terra that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Betsy
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Betsy that play both.
Bravo
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Kayo
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Kayo that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Rhinar
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rhinar that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Civic Steps
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Tectonic Plating
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Skullhorn
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Savage Sash
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Nullrune Hood
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Arcane Lantern
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Beaten Trackers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Stand Ground
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Stand Ground that play both.
Knucklehead
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Flat Trackers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Monstrous Veil
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Monstrous Veil that play both.
Raw Meat
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Raw Meat that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Hide Tanner
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Hide Tanner that play both.
Vigor Girth
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Anothos
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Romping Club
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Romping Club that play both.
Titan's Fist
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Redwood Hammer
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Mandible Claw
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Rok
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rok that play both.
Ball Breaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Ball Breaker that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.762.758389262
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.618279570
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.605683837
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.672.672131148
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.613300493
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.486842105
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.479518072
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.445983380
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.452.451612903
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Thrive
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thrive that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Talk a Big Game that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Seeds of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Seeds of Strength that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Argh... Smash! that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Rolling Thunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rolling Thunder that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Seeds of Strength (Yellow) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Attack Action
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
2.852.846153846
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.699849170
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.614718615
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.792.785567010
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.611111111
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.511485452
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Splatter Skull that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.762.756440281
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.631205674
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.462343096
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.589201878
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.493644068
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.323353293
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.535108959
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.466334165
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Show No Mercy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Show No Mercy that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.465053763
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.489189189
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.424657534
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.428030303
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.520161290
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.443478261
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Smash Instinct (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.495412844
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smash Instinct (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Skull Crack that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.536737235
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.413223140
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.692129630
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.682.680430880
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.512.512455516
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.395894428
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.