banner
Lead with Power (Red)
2686 decks (0.3536%)
Price History
Lead with Power (Red)
Brute,guardian Action
Your next Brute or Guardian attack this turn gets +3{p}. Create a Might token. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.973.968191925
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.612.611768393
Hero
Jarl VetreiΓ°i
Jarl VetreiΓ°i
3600% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Jarl VetreiΓ°i that play both.
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Terra
Terra
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Terra that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Betsy
Betsy
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Betsy that play both.
Kayo
Kayo
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Kayo that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Rhinar
Rhinar
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rhinar that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
2800% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
Root-Bound Trunks
800% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
Ollin Ice Cap
600% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Tectonic Crust
Tectonic Crust
500% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Attention Grabbers
Attention Grabbers
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Attention Grabbers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Craterhoof
Craterhoof
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
Gauntlet of Might
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Boots to the Boards
Boots to the Boards
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Boots to the Boards that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
Barkbone Strapping
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Horns of the Despised
Horns of the Despised
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Horns of the Despised that play both.
Beaten Trackers
Beaten Trackers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Stand Ground
Stand Ground
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Stand Ground that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Knucklehead
Knucklehead
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
Gambler's Gloves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Monstrous Veil
Monstrous Veil
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Monstrous Veil that play both.
Mightybone Knuckles
Mightybone Knuckles
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mightybone Knuckles that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Raw Meat
Raw Meat
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Raw Meat that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Hide Tanner
Hide Tanner
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Hide Tanner that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
Summit, the Unforgiving
1100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
Romping Club
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Romping Club that play both.
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Rok
Rok
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rok that play both.
Redwood Hammer
Redwood Hammer
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Ball Breaker
Ball Breaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Ball Breaker that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
2.972.966666667
2900% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β 
2.952.952380952
2000% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
1400% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Cruel Ambition
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cruel Ambition that play both.
Revolting Gesture
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Revolting Gesture that play both.
Villainous Pose (Red)
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Booze! that play both.
Two Steps Ahead
Two Steps Ahead
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.837209302
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Two Steps Ahead that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.788874842
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Sadistic Scowl
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642265193
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.612156295
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Prime the Crowd (Red)
Prime the Crowd (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Prime the Crowd (Red) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.550986842
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.588235294
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.498007968
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.458049887
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.483644860
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Villainous Pose (Yellow)
Villainous Pose (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Villainous Pose (Yellow) that play both.
Song of Sinew
Song of Sinew
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Song of Sinew that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.443502825
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Talk a Big Game that play both.
Surface Shaking
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Heroic Pose (Red)
Heroic Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Heroic Pose (Red) that play both.
Rolling Thunder
Rolling Thunder
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rolling Thunder that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Villainous Pose (Blue)
Villainous Pose (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Villainous Pose (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Clearing Bellow
Clearing Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Clearing Bellow that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Short Shrift
Short Shrift
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Short Shrift that play both.
Cut a Long Story Short
Cut a Long Story Short
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cut a Long Story Short that play both.
Escalate Violence
Escalate Violence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Escalate Violence that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wee Wrecking Ball
Wee Wrecking Ball
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wee Wrecking Ball that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.708333333
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.613714286
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Bully Tactics
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bully Tactics that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Power Play (Blue)
Power Play (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Power Play (Blue) that play both.
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
No Tall Tales
No Tall Tales
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and No Tall Tales that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Spew Obscenities
Spew Obscenities
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Spew Obscenities that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.616058394
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.503075031
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Show of Strength that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.577170418
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.633776091
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.475247525
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.495881384
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.593253968
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.681818182
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Overcrowded that play both.
Wind Up the Crowd
Wind Up the Crowd
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wind Up the Crowd that play both.
Goon Beatdown
Goon Beatdown
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Goon Beatdown that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Splatter Skull
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Splatter Skull that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.377272727
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.496254682
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Bam Bam
Bam Bam
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bam Bam that play both.
Beast Within
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506958250
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.504149378
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Fix the Match
Fix the Match
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fix the Match that play both.
Crowd Goes Wild
Crowd Goes Wild
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crowd Goes Wild that play both.
Jaws of Victory
Jaws of Victory
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Jaws of Victory that play both.
Energetic Impact
Energetic Impact
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Energetic Impact that play both.
Show No Mercy
Show No Mercy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Show No Mercy that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.474272931
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smashing Ground that play both.
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Vigorous Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Strength Rules All
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Sea Legs
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sea Legs that play both.
Good Natured Brutality
Good Natured Brutality
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Good Natured Brutality that play both.
Overturn the Results
Overturn the Results
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.526315789
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Overturn the Results that play both.
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.450746269
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Strongest Survive (Blue) that play both.
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tough Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
Cut the Small Talk
Cut the Small Talk
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cut the Small Talk that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.460317460
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Disarm
Disarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Disarm that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.518151815
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Red)
Smash Instinct (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smash Instinct (Red) that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Old Leather and Vim
Old Leather and Vim
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Old Leather and Vim that play both.
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Vigorous Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Low Blow
Low Blow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Low Blow that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.534774436
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.421161826
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
New
Emboldened by the Crowd
Emboldened by the Crowd
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Emboldened by the Crowd that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.675724638
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.660404624
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.526315789
1300% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Truth or Trickery
Truth or Trickery
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Truth or Trickery that play both.
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.533132530
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Leave Them Hanging
Leave Them Hanging
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Leave Them Hanging that play both.
Tension in the Air (Red)
Tension in the Air (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tension in the Air (Red) that play both.
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
Concealed Object
Concealed Object
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Concealed Object that play both.
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Edge of Their Seats (Blue) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.408114558
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Numbskull Charm
Numbskull Charm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Numbskull Charm that play both.
Liar's Charm
Liar's Charm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Liar's Charm that play both.
The Suspense is Killing Me
The Suspense is Killing Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and The Suspense is Killing Me that play both.
What Happens Next?
What Happens Next?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and What Happens Next? that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Visit the Boneyard
Visit the Boneyard
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Visit the Boneyard that play both.
In the Palm of Your Hand
In the Palm of Your Hand
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and In the Palm of Your Hand that play both.
Act of Glory (Blue)
Act of Glory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Act of Glory (Blue) that play both.