banner
Lead with Power (Red)
2464 decks (0.3743%)
Price History
Lead with Power (Red)
Brute,guardian Action
Your next Brute or Guardian attack this turn gets +3{p}. Create a Might token. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
4.054.053707170
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.612.611516486
Hero
Terra
Terra
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Terra that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Betsy
Betsy
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Betsy that play both.
Bravo
Bravo
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Kayo
Kayo
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Kayo that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Rhinar
Rhinar
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rhinar that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
Gauntlet of Might
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
Barkbone Strapping
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Beaten Trackers
Beaten Trackers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Stand Ground
Stand Ground
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Stand Ground that play both.
Knucklehead
Knucklehead
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
Gambler's Gloves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Monstrous Veil
Monstrous Veil
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Monstrous Veil that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
Tremorshield Sabatons
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Hide Tanner
Hide Tanner
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Hide Tanner that play both.
Raw Meat
Raw Meat
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Raw Meat that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
Anothos
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Anothos that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
Romping Club
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Romping Club that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Redwood Hammer
Redwood Hammer
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Rok
Rok
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rok that play both.
Ball Breaker
Ball Breaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Ball Breaker that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Flying High (Blue)
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.766106443
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.624815362
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.617283951
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.508992806
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.596602972
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Midas Touch that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.492662474
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.443645084
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.465517241
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.420895522
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Talk a Big Game that play both.
Public Bounty (Red)
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
Rolling Thunder
Rolling Thunder
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rolling Thunder that play both.
Flourish
Flourish
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Thrive
Thrive
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thrive that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Argh... Smash! that play both.
Clearing Bellow
Clearing Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Clearing Bellow that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Bam Bam
Bam Bam
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bam Bam that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.702634881
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.604982206
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.608433735
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.498103666
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.755905512
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Splatter Skull
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Splatter Skull that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.567612688
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.622309198
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.466437177
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.483816014
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.587398374
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Walk the Plank (Red)
Walk the Plank (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Walk the Plank (Red) that play both.
Sea Legs
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sea Legs that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Money or Your Life? (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.355608592
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.470941884
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.540540541
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.519067797
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.473922902
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Show No Mercy
Show No Mercy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Show No Mercy that play both.
Strength Rules All
Strength Rules All
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.496659243
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.410256410
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.440366972
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.577181208
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.461805556
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.508361204
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Red)
Smash Instinct (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smash Instinct (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Red)
Mighty Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.522908367
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.404867257
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.669245648
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.650914634
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.532307692
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.363874346
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Resource
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.