banner
Lead with Power (Red)
1944 decks (0.3958%)
Price History
Lead with Power (Red)
Guardian,brute Action
Your next Brute or Guardian attack this turn gets +3{p}. Create a Might token. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
4.094.092897155
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.612.611304719
Hero
Terra
Terra
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Terra that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Betsy
Betsy
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Betsy that play both.
Kayo
Kayo
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Kayo that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Rhinar
Rhinar
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rhinar that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
Gauntlet of Might
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
Barkbone Strapping
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Beaten Trackers
Beaten Trackers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
Gambler's Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Stand Ground
Stand Ground
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Stand Ground that play both.
Knucklehead
Knucklehead
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Monstrous Veil
Monstrous Veil
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Monstrous Veil that play both.
Raw Meat
Raw Meat
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Raw Meat that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Hide Tanner
Hide Tanner
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Hide Tanner that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Weapon
Anothos
Anothos
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Romping Club
Romping Club
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Romping Club that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Redwood Hammer
Redwood Hammer
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Rok
Rok
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rok that play both.
Ball Breaker
Ball Breaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Ball Breaker that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.766256591
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.620817844
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.606946984
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.719298246
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Flourish
Flourish
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.616966581
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.489655172
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.481481481
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Flourish (Yellow)
Flourish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Flourish (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.446064140
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Thrive
Thrive
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thrive that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.459876543
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.388888889
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Talk a Big Game that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Argh... Smash! that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Strong Yield (Blue)
Strong Yield (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Strong Yield (Blue) that play both.
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Seeds of Strength (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Seeds of Strength (Yellow) that play both.
Seeds of Strength
Seeds of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Seeds of Strength that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
Rolling Thunder
Rolling Thunder
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rolling Thunder that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Attack Action
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.867924528
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.704687500
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.621257485
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.787234043
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.617375231
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.523961661
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Splatter Skull
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Splatter Skull that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.762135922
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.578288100
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Strength Rules All
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.634146341
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.592233010
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.472647702
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Red)
Thump (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.497797357
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thump (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.541353383
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.324921136
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Bracken Rap (Red)
Bracken Rap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bracken Rap (Red) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.476562500
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Show No Mercy
Show No Mercy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Show No Mercy that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.463888889
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Beast Within
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Red)
Command Respect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.505586592
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command Respect (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.624521073
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Might (Red)
Wage Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.434628975
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wage Might (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.444881890
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.520491803
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Primed to Fight that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Red)
Smash Instinct (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.495327103
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Smash Instinct (Red) that play both.
Skull Crack
Skull Crack
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Skull Crack that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Red)
Mighty Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Mighty Windup (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.539661899
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.412103746
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.700119474
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.681985294
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.527881041
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.394578313
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lead with Power (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.