banner
New
Fire in the Hole
61 decks (0.009442%)
Price History

No price data yet.

Fire in the Hole
Ranger Action
Your next arrow attack this turn gets +3{p}. You may {u} a bow you control. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.202.195967532
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.582.578368261
Hero
New
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Equipment
Bull's Eye Bracers
Bull's Eye Bracers
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
Trench of Sunken Treasure
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
New Horizon
New Horizon
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and New Horizon that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
Enchanted Quiver
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
New
Sealace Sarong
Sealace Sarong
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Quiver of Rustling Leaves
Quiver of Rustling Leaves
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Quiver of Rustling Leaves that play both.
Perch Grapplers
Perch Grapplers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Perch Grapplers that play both.
New
Glidewell Fins
Glidewell Fins
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Glidewell Fins that play both.
New
Gold-Baited Hook
Gold-Baited Hook
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Sharp Shooters
Sharp Shooters
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Skullbone Crosswrap
Skullbone Crosswrap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Skullbone Crosswrap that play both.
New
Blue Sea Tricorn
Blue Sea Tricorn
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Blue Sea Tricorn that play both.
New
Buccaneer's Bounty
Buccaneer's Bounty
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Longdraw Half-Glove
Longdraw Half-Glove
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Longdraw Half-Glove that play both.
Flight Path
Flight Path
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Flight Path that play both.
New
Peg Leg
Peg Leg
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Peg Leg that play both.
Weapon
New
Redspine Manta
Redspine Manta
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Redspine Manta that play both.
Dreadbore
Dreadbore
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Dreadbore that play both.
New
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
Death Dealer
Death Dealer
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Death Dealer that play both.
Action
New
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.897435897
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Call in the Big Guns (Red) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.897435897
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Seek and Destroy
Seek and Destroy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Seek and Destroy that play both.
Lace with Bloodrot
Lace with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.780487805
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Lace with Bloodrot that play both.
Premeditate
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Premeditate that play both.
Lace with Frailty
Lace with Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Lace with Frailty that play both.
Release the Tension (Red)
Release the Tension (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Release the Tension (Red) that play both.
Lace with Inertia
Lace with Inertia
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.709677419
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Lace with Inertia that play both.
Take Aim (Red)
Take Aim (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Take Aim (Red) that play both.
Three of a Kind
Three of a Kind
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454545455
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Three of a Kind that play both.
New
Drop the Anchor
Drop the Anchor
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777777778
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Drop the Anchor that play both.
New
Gold the Tip
Gold the Tip
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Gold the Tip that play both.
Read the Glide Path (Red)
Read the Glide Path (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Read the Glide Path (Red) that play both.
New
Call in the Big Guns (Yellow)
Call in the Big Guns (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Call in the Big Guns (Yellow) that play both.
New
Line
Line
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Line that play both.
Poison the Tips
Poison the Tips
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Poison the Tips that play both.
Portside Exchange
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Portside Exchange that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
New
Big Game Trophy Shot
Big Game Trophy Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Big Game Trophy Shot that play both.
New
Loan Shark
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Loan Shark that play both.
Tri-shot
Tri-shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Tri-shot that play both.
New
Sea Floor Salvage
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Rapid Fire
Rapid Fire
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Rapid Fire that play both.
New
Call in the Big Guns (Blue)
Call in the Big Guns (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Call in the Big Guns (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Swift Shot
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.913043478
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Swift Shot that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
Endless Arrow
Endless Arrow
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.902439024
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Endless Arrow that play both.
New
Dry Powder Shot
Dry Powder Shot
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.894736842
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Dry Powder Shot that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Yellow)
Bolt'n' Shot (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Bolt'n' Shot (Yellow) that play both.
Drill Shot (Red)
Drill Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Drill Shot (Red) that play both.
Falcon Wing (Red)
Falcon Wing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Falcon Wing (Red) that play both.
Searing Shot (Red)
Searing Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Searing Shot (Red) that play both.
Remorseless
Remorseless
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Remorseless that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Blue)
Bolt'n' Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Bolt'n' Shot (Blue) that play both.
Heat Seeker
Heat Seeker
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Heat Seeker that play both.
Sic 'Em Shot (Red)
Sic 'Em Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sic 'Em Shot (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Red)
Infecting Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Infecting Shot (Red) that play both.
New
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
New
Red Fin Harpoon
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
New
Blue Fin Harpoon
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
New
Rusty Harpoon
Rusty Harpoon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Rusty Harpoon that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Amplifying Arrow
Amplifying Arrow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Amplifying Arrow that play both.
Widowmaker (Blue)
Widowmaker (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Widowmaker (Blue) that play both.
New
King Shark Harpoon
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
New
King Kraken Harpoon
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
Infecting Shot (Blue)
Infecting Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Infecting Shot (Blue) that play both.
Head Shot (Red)
Head Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Head Shot (Red) that play both.
New
Conqueror of the High Seas
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
New
Nettling Shot
Nettling Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Nettling Shot that play both.
Battering Bolt
Battering Bolt
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Battering Bolt that play both.
Murkmire Grapnel (Red)
Murkmire Grapnel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Murkmire Grapnel (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Command and Conquer that play both.
Sic 'Em Shot (Yellow)
Sic 'Em Shot (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sic 'Em Shot (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Enlightened Strike that play both.
New
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Sleep Dart (Red)
Sleep Dart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sleep Dart (Red) that play both.
Intoxicating Shot
Intoxicating Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Intoxicating Shot that play both.
Sic 'Em Shot (Blue)
Sic 'Em Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sic 'Em Shot (Blue) that play both.
New
Golden Tipple (Red)
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Head Shot (Blue)
Head Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Head Shot (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Salvage Shot (Blue)
Salvage Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Salvage Shot (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Tarpit Trap
Tarpit Trap
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Tarpit Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636363636
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454545455
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Inertia Trap that play both.
Boulder Trap
Boulder Trap
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Boulder Trap that play both.
Block
New
Return Fire
Return Fire
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Return Fire that play both.
New
Sunken Treasure
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Rain Razors
Rain Razors
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.533333333
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Rain Razors that play both.