Fire in the Hole
Ranger Action
Your next arrow attack this turn gets +3{p}.
You may {u} a bow you control.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.102.099710580
Average Defense Value: Β
2.552.545567645
Hero
Marlynn
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Marlynn that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Equipment
Trench of Sunken Treasure
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
New Horizon
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and New Horizon that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Sealace Sarong
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Quiver of Rustling Leaves
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Quiver of Rustling Leaves that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Skullbone Crosswrap
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Skullbone Crosswrap that play both.
Perch Grapplers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Glidewell Fins
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Glidewell Fins that play both.
Longdraw Half-Glove
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Longdraw Half-Glove that play both.
Crown of Dominion
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Sharp Shooters
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Buccaneer's Bounty
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Nullrune Boots
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Driftwood Quiver
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Driftwood Quiver that play both.
Blue Sea Tricorn
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Blue Sea Tricorn that play both.
Weapon
Redspine Manta
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Redspine Manta that play both.
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
Dreadbore
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Dreadbore that play both.
Death Dealer
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Death Dealer that play both.
Action
Lace with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β
2.812.814049587
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Lace with Bloodrot that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Seek and Destroy
Avg. played: Β
2.882.882352941
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Seek and Destroy that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.790178571
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Call in the Big Guns (Red) that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β
2.882.877906977
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Premeditate that play both.
Lace with Frailty
Avg. played: Β
2.832.833333333
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Lace with Frailty that play both.
Release the Tension (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.770370370
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Release the Tension (Red) that play both.
Three of a Kind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Three of a Kind that play both.
Drop the Anchor
Avg. played: Β
2.742.738805970
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Drop the Anchor that play both.
Lace with Inertia
Avg. played: Β
2.692.690140845
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Lace with Inertia that play both.
Take Aim (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.800000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Take Aim (Red) that play both.
Gold the Tip
Avg. played: Β
2.782.780219780
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Gold the Tip that play both.
Big Game Trophy Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Big Game Trophy Shot that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Portside Exchange that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Line that play both.
Read the Glide Path (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.631578947
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Read the Glide Path (Red) that play both.
Poison the Tips
Avg. played: Β
2.602.596491228
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Poison the Tips that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.596153846
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Call in the Big Guns (Yellow) that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Loan Shark that play both.
Codex of Inertia
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Codex of Inertia that play both.
Rapid Fire
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Rapid Fire that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Scout the Periphery (Red) that play both.
Point the Tip (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Point the Tip (Red) that play both.
Sinker
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sinker that play both.
Chart a Course (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Chart a Course (Red) that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Attack Action
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β
2.872.866666667
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Swift Shot that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.902.899193548
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
Endless Arrow
Avg. played: Β
2.852.854545455
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Endless Arrow that play both.
Dry Powder Shot
Avg. played: Β
2.802.803418803
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Dry Powder Shot that play both.
Falcon Wing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Falcon Wing (Red) that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Bolt'n' Shot (Yellow) that play both.
Drill Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.851063830
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Drill Shot (Red) that play both.
Searing Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.809859155
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Searing Shot (Red) that play both.
Remorseless
Avg. played: Β
2.782.780303030
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Remorseless that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Bolt'n' Shot (Blue) that play both.
Sic 'Em Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.767676768
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sic 'Em Shot (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
Heat Seeker
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Heat Seeker that play both.
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
Infecting Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Infecting Shot (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Rusty Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Rusty Harpoon that play both.
Battering Bolt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Battering Bolt that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Amplifying Arrow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Amplifying Arrow that play both.
Murkmire Grapnel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Murkmire Grapnel (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Infecting Shot (Blue) that play both.
Drill Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Drill Shot (Blue) that play both.
Nettling Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Nettling Shot that play both.
Entangling Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Entangling Shot that play both.
Head Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Head Shot (Red) that play both.
Barbed Barrage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Barbed Barrage that play both.
Falcon Wing (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Falcon Wing (Yellow) that play both.
Searing Shot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Searing Shot (Blue) that play both.
Widowmaker (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Widowmaker (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Tarpit Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.842.842105263
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Tarpit Trap that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.672.671428571
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Frailty Trap that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.492.489795918
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Inertia Trap that play both.
Boulder Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547619048
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Boulder Trap that play both.
Take Cover (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Take Cover (Red) that play both.
Block
Return Fire
Avg. played: Β
2.802.802816901
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Return Fire that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Rain Razors
Avg. played: Β
2.772.775000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Rain Razors that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Fire in the Hole and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.