banner
Cut Through (Blue)
426 decks (0.05669%)
Price History
Cut Through (Blue)
Assassin,ninja Attack Action - Attack
If you've hit with a dagger this combat chain, this gets +1{p} and go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.502.504130945
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.402.396755991
Hero
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Benji, the Piercing Wind
Benji, the Piercing Wind
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Equipment
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Robe of Autumn's Fall
Robe of Autumn's Fall
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Iris of the Blossom
Iris of the Blossom
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Old Knocker that play both.
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Tearing Shuko
Tearing Shuko
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Breaking Scales
Breaking Scales
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Okana Scar Wraps
Okana Scar Wraps
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Okana Scar Wraps that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
Breeze Rider Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Danger Digits that play both.
Weapon
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Zephyr Needle
Zephyr Needle
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Kunai of Retribution
Kunai of Retribution
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
Claw of Vynserakai
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Action
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Dual Threat that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.808510638
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.741176471
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636363636
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Up Sticks and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Biting Breeze (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.911564626
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Overcrowded that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.834224599
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.715083799
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Pick Up the Point (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.792592593
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Whirling Mist Blossom
Whirling Mist Blossom
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Whirling Mist Blossom that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
Stab Wound
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.652173913
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Stab Wound that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Double Strike
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.593984962
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Double Strike that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Censor that play both.
Take the Tempo
Take the Tempo
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Take the Tempo that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Poisoned Blade (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
New
Tempest Palm Gustwave
Tempest Palm Gustwave
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.200000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Tempest Palm Gustwave that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.546391753
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Spring Tidings
Spring Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Spring Tidings that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Rushing River (Blue)
Rushing River (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Rushing River (Blue) that play both.
Bleed Out (Red)
Bleed Out (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Bleed Out (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.661971831
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Rotten Remains
Rotten Remains
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Rotten Remains that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Yellow)
Pick Up the Point (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.338235294
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Pick Up the Point (Yellow) that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Blue)
Poisoned Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.560000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Poisoned Blade (Blue) that play both.
Crane Dance (Blue)
Crane Dance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Crane Dance (Blue) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Blue)
Bittering Thorns (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Bittering Thorns (Blue) that play both.
New
Bluster Buff
Bluster Buff
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Bluster Buff that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Mauling Qi
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Mauling Qi that play both.
Flying Kick (Red)
Flying Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Flying Kick (Red) that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Wrath of Retribution
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Rising Knee Thrust (Blue)
Rising Knee Thrust (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Rising Knee Thrust (Blue) that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Yellow)
Poisoned Blade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Poisoned Blade (Yellow) that play both.
Head Jab (Blue)
Head Jab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Head Jab (Blue) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Cut Through (Yellow)
Cut Through (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Cut Through (Yellow) that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Wander With Purpose
Wander With Purpose
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Wander With Purpose that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
One-Two Punch (Blue)
One-Two Punch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and One-Two Punch (Blue) that play both.
Vipox
Vipox
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Vipox that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Chase the Tail
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Chase the Tail that play both.
Hurl (Blue)
Hurl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Hurl (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733333333
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.702127660
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Knives Out
Knives Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.747474747
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Knives Out that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.660550459
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.710000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Legacy of Ikaru
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.879629630
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.769784173
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Wax On (Red)
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Wax On (Red) that play both.
New
Hunter or Hunted?
Hunter or Hunted?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and Hunter or Hunted? that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Blue) and That All You Got? that play both.