Short and Sharp (Red)
Ninja,assassin Attack Reaction
Choose 1;
Target dagger attack gains +3{p}.
Target attack action card with 2 or less base {p} gains +3{p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.562.560551543
Average Defense Value: Β
2.562.558668046
Hero
New
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Benji, the Piercing Wind
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Nuu
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Nuu that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Uzuri
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Ira, Crimson Haze
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Ira, Crimson Haze that play both.
Equipment
Widow Web Crawler
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Flick Knives
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Momentum
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Tide Flippers
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Redback Shroud
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Mask of Perdition
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Nullrune Robe
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Toxic Tips
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Nullrune Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Breaking Scales
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Breaking Scales that play both.
Blossom of Spring
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Pouncing Paws
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Arousing Wave
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Shriek Razors
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Blade Cuff
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Blade Cuff that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Mask of Many Faces
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Mask of Many Faces that play both.
Blood Scent
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Blood Scent that play both.
Silken Gi
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Silken Gi that play both.
Crown of Providence
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Weapon
Harmonized Kodachi
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Spider's Bite
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Zephyr Needle
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Tiger Taming Khakkara
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Action
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Biting Breeze (Yellow) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.212.214007782
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608108108
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Head Jab (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Head Jab (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β
2.612.613636364
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Spring Tidings
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Spring Tidings that play both.
Head Jab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Head Jab (Blue) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
2.662.659836066
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β
2.652.654761905
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.322.320261438
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Stab Wound that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Double Strike that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
2.692.688679245
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Be Like Water (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Be Like Water (Yellow) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
One-Two Punch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and One-Two Punch (Blue) that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
One-Two Punch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and One-Two Punch (Yellow) that play both.
Vipox
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Vipox that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.353099730
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Be Like Water (Blue) that play both.
Plunge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Plunge (Yellow) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Bleed Out (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.419947507
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Bleed Out (Red) that play both.
Malign (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Ride the Tailwind (Yellow) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.590395480
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Wander With Purpose
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Wander With Purpose that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.395136778
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.361290323
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Twin Twisters (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Twin Twisters (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Head Jab (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Head Jab (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.605633803
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β
2.552.545454545
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Prowl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Prowl (Yellow) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Plunge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Plunge (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.478873239
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.452.446153846
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Recoil (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Recoil (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Ride the Tailwind (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Hurl (Yellow) that play both.
Plunge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Plunge (Blue) that play both.
Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Deadly Duo (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Deadly Duo (Yellow) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Mind's Desire (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Twin Twisters (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Twin Twisters (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Hurl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Hurl (Blue) that play both.
Back Heel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Back Heel Kick (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Back Heel Kick (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Back Heel Kick (Yellow) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.312.309692671
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.382.377873563
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.262.264184397
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Knives Out
Avg. played: Β
2.352.349397590
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Knives Out that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β
2.682.678571429
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Maul
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Maul that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.554945055
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Short and Sharp (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Short and Sharp (Yellow) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.524390244
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.518309859
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Razor Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.454248366
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.514285714
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β
2.432.427480916
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Razor's Edge (Yellow) that play both.
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Lunging Press that play both.
Short and Sharp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Short and Sharp (Blue) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.370192308
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Bloodrot Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Bloodrot Trap that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Short and Sharp (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.