Brothers in Arms (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When you defend with Brothers in Arms, you may pay {r}. If you do, it gains +2{d}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.433.434286096
Average Defense Value: Β
2.542.535186498
Hero
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Terra
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Terra that play both.
Uzuri
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Prism, Awakener of Sol
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Dash I/O
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Dash I/O that play both.
Puffin, Hightail
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Puffin, Hightail that play both.
Dromai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Dromai that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Dromai, Ash Artist
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Gloves
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Okana Scar Wraps
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Okana Scar Wraps that play both.
Robe of Autumn's Fall
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Ironhide Legs
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcane Lantern
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Base of the Mountain
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Civic Steps
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Danger Digits
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Iris of the Blossom
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Silent Stilettos
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Balance of Justice
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Ironhide Helm
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Wave of Reality
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Toxic Tips
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Ironhide Plate
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Ironhide Plate that play both.
Old Knocker
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Silken Form
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Silken Form that play both.
Perch Grapplers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Starting Point
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Halo of Illumination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Refraction Bolters
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Teklo Base Arms
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Teklo Base Arms that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Flick Knives
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Deep Blue
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Mask of Perdition
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Leap Frog Leggings
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Leap Frog Leggings that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Weapon
Redwood Hammer
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Redwood Hammer that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Spider's Bite
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Storm of Sandikai
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Symbiosis Shot
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Symbiosis Shot that play both.
Cogwerx Blunderbuss
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Cogwerx Blunderbuss that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Iris of Reality
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Iris of Reality that play both.
Titan's Fist
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Orbitoclast
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Dreadbore
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Dreadbore that play both.
Action
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Visit Anvilheim
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Visit Anvilheim that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.652.648648649
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Flourish that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Midas Touch that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Sapphire Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Sapphire Amulet that play both.
Cog in the Machine
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Cog in the Machine that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Scrub the Deck
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Scrub the Deck that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Truce that play both.
Dissolving Shield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Dissolving Shield (Red) that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Mini Forcefield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Mini Forcefield (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.480000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Spark of Genius
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Spark of Genius that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Haze Bending that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.712.705009276
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Blue) that play both.
Enact Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Enact Vengeance that play both.
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Seek Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Seek Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Vengeance Never Rests
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Vengeance Never Rests that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.531468531
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.252.250000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.672.672932331
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Intoxicating Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Intoxicating Shot that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Yellow) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Down and Dirty
Avg. played: Β
2.442.443661972
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Down and Dirty that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Bam Bam
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Bam Bam that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Yellow) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Sky Skimmer (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Sky Skimmer (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Concuss (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
2.502.502857143
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Ripple Away that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Rally the Rearguard (Red) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.542094456
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.502.501408451
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.412.411764706
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.464788732
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.602.597315436
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.535519126
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Tarpit Trap
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Tarpit Trap that play both.
Boulder Trap
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Boulder Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Soul Shield
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Soul Shield that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Firewall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Firewall (Red) that play both.
Pinion Sentry
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Pinion Sentry that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.480366492
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.602325581
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.583333333
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.428571429
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.381.378600823
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Figment of Protection
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Brothers in Arms (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.