banner
Cut Down to Size (Red)
4970 decks (0.8273%)
Price History
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.523.517208794
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.602.599901931
Hero
Uzuri
Uzuri
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
New
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
New
Starting Point
Starting Point
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Meridian Pathway
Meridian Pathway
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Calming Gesture
Calming Gesture
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
New
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
New
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.802130898
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.766081871
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
New
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Rage Specter
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rage Specter that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.633193863
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
New
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.790633609
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.632955877
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.792327366
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836293008
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.676133761
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.612137203
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.603937729
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797385621
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.573093220
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
New
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.318722944
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.562199313
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.504085481
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Smash Up
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
New
Sound the Alarm
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555339806
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.594036697
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.409568261
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.647058824
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.460122699
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.460024600
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
New
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506067961
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.467289720
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.519230769
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.543810848
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Amnesia
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.736305732
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.596554200
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.567882079
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.656136087
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.411829135
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.518886680
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.412269939
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.638620690
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.459493671
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.575931232
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.691614067
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.659036719
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437673130
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.442396313
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.548335975
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
New
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.