banner
Cut Down to Size (Red)
3958 decks (0.9059%)
Price History
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.543.542301743
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.602.603814726
Hero
Uzuri
Uzuri
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
New
Aurora, Shooting Star
Aurora, Shooting Star
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
New
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Enigma
Enigma
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
Helm of Halo's Grace
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
New
Calming Gesture
Calming Gesture
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
New
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Meridian Pathway
Meridian Pathway
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
New
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Waves of Aqua Marine
Waves of Aqua Marine
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waves of Aqua Marine that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
New
Lightning Greaves
Lightning Greaves
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
New
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
New
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Sharp Shooters
Sharp Shooters
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Knucklehead
Knucklehead
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
Stonewall Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Star Fall
Star Fall
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Teklo Leveler
Teklo Leveler
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Teklo Leveler that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.734567901
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797668609
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Rage Specter
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rage Specter that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.643895349
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.663594470
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
New
Arc Lightning
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arc Lightning that play both.
New
Harvest Season (Red)
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
New
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
New
Succumb to Temptation
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Line It Up
Line It Up
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Line It Up that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Essence of Ancestry: Mind that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.784393324
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.640768223
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.794813980
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835866261
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.690680101
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.628310063
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.613567839
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.831254585
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.796711510
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.590670554
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.575916230
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510290987
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.289367429
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.575076609
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.417929293
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.457106274
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.519230769
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.473404255
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.584415584
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
New
Smash Up
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
New
Hand Behind the Pen
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
New
Snuff Out
Snuff Out
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snuff Out that play both.
Fry (Red)
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.540284360
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.488687783
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.514388489
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Wind
Second Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Second Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506172840
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Run Roughshod
Run Roughshod
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Censor that play both.
Terminator Tank
Terminator Tank
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Terminator Tank that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
War Machine
War Machine
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and War Machine that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.734275618
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.595921450
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.563354603
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.658176944
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.380108992
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.533018868
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.401333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.638081395
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.440379404
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.576547231
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Siren's Call
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Siren's Call that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.682763744
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Saving Grace
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Saving Grace that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.656212304
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437500000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Hold the Line
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hold the Line that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.443820225
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
New
Channel Lightning Valley
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
New
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Dense Blue Mist
Dense Blue Mist
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Dense Blue Mist that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.491193738
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.