Cut Down to Size (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.543.540468797
Average Defense Value:
2.622.615135982
Hero
Uzuri
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Kayo
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Kayo that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Flick Knives
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Arcane Lantern
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Toxic Tips
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Mask of Perdition
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Shriek Razors
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Redback Shroud
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Cogwerx Base Arms
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Base Arms that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Cogwerx Base Head
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Base Head that play both.
Cogwerx Base Legs
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Base Legs that play both.
Cogwerx Base Chest
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Base Chest that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Knucklehead
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Teklo Base Arms
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Teklo Base Arms that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Teklo Base Legs
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Teklo Base Legs that play both.
Tide Flippers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Teklo Leveler
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Teklo Leveler that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.802.803921569
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.678513732
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.582.583850932
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Memory
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Memory that play both.
Singularity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Singularity that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Processor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Processor that play both.
Evo Sentry Base Head
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Evo Sentry Base Head that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.792.789129341
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.662.663587749
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.802.799516908
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.704533042
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.842.835625409
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.648662821
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.632.633444075
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
2.832.833733014
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.802.804224208
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.617458280
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
2.762.763975155
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.606312292
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.542.537520392
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.286833856
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.607260726
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.742.740963855
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.455746367
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.542857143
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.451008646
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Terminator Tank
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Terminator Tank that play both.
War Machine
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and War Machine that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.492.493212670
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.542.543657331
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Junkyard Dogg (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Junkyard Dogg (Blue) that play both.
Mechanical Strength (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mechanical Strength (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.482.484848485
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.513089005
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Pulsewave Protocol
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pulsewave Protocol that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Meganetic Protocol
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Meganetic Protocol that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.522.518518519
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Blue) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Censor that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.522.523809524
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Scrap Compactor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scrap Compactor (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Junkyard Dogg (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Junkyard Dogg (Red) that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.742.743629344
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.598870056
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.556644880
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.664739884
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.642.643939394
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.559366755
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.412.406827881
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.390243902
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.452.453879941
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.589041096
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.694516971
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.672.671418389
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.452.451438849
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Block
Steel Street Enforcement
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Steel Street Enforcement that play both.
Firewall (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Firewall (Red) that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.468599034
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.496598639
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.