Cut Down to Size (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.513.512993253
Average Defense Value:
2.602.596586035
Hero
Uzuri
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Flick Knives
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Arcane Lantern
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Danger Digits
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Starting Point
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Old Knocker
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Toxic Tips
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Traverse the Universe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Redback Shroud
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Meridian Pathway
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Pouncing Paws
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Calming Gesture
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Tide Flippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Mask of Momentum
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Arousing Wave
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Orbitoclast
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.616511318
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rage Specter that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Attack Action
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.902.903225806
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.792.794227886
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.635365392
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.802.795330353
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.842.835057158
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.676169265
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.612806188
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.612.605026930
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.802.798615481
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.574896694
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.339518556
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.555482166
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.507917174
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.622.616931217
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.554597701
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.412.412031782
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.459783914
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.461725395
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.556962025
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.505350773
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.469755470
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.560975610
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Censor that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.507462687
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.742.735475896
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.595087719
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.575464684
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.421548117
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.653983353
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.523400191
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.422.416267943
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.632.632275132
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.462.455000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.578296703
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.692135460
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.662.659384753
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.442.437246964
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.429336188
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.564254062
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.