Cut Down to Size (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.523.523573963
Average Defense Value:
2.592.592555280
Hero
Jarl Vetreiði
800% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Jarl Vetreiði that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
168% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Uzuri
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
750% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
550% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Tectonic Crust
400% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
400% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Okana Scar Wraps
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Okana Scar Wraps that play both.
Iris of the Blossom
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Robe of Autumn's Fall
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Flick Knives
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Arcane Lantern
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Old Knocker
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Starting Point
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Toxic Tips
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Pouncing Paws
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Tide Flippers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Danger Digits
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Redback Shroud
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Mask of Momentum
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Traverse the Universe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Meridian Pathway
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Calming Gesture
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
550% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Spider's Bite
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Orbitoclast
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played:
2.892.888888889
800% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played:
2.932.933333333
700% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
600% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Cerebellum Processor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cerebellum Processor that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.614173228
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rage Specter that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Attack Action
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Enact Vengeance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enact Vengeance that play both.
Seek Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Seek Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.912.909747292
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Vengeance Never Rests
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vengeance Never Rests that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.812.805680637
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.639011799
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.802.799229658
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.842.836615221
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.671453438
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.611814346
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.612.605298013
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.802.801418440
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.381682734
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.573678862
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Overcrowded
Avg. played:
2.132.131578947
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Overcrowded that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.511323004
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.557003257
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.652.653914591
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.551136364
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.412.412680756
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.575757576
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Censor that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.462703963
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Show of Strength
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Show of Strength that play both.
Tempest Palm Gustwave
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tempest Palm Gustwave that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.465144231
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.506478210
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.471250000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Bluster Buff
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bluster Buff that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.524475524
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.457627119
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.742.736111111
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.598066298
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.582857143
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.453183521
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.527881041
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.655737705
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.632.626550868
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.422.422943221
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.462.455773956
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.587533156
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.712032562
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.672.670150502
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Hunter or Hunted?
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hunter or Hunted? that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.442.438082557
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played:
2.382.384615385
350% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.438066465
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.601532567
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.