Cut Down to Size (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.513.509575577
Average Defense Value:
2.602.597216209
Hero
Uzuri
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Puffin, Hightail
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Puffin, Hightail that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Gravy Bones
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Gravy Bones that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Flick Knives
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Arcane Lantern
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Danger Digits
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Starting Point
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Toxic Tips
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Cogwerx Tinker Rings
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Tinker Rings that play both.
Unicycle
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Unicycle that play both.
Old Knocker
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Traverse the Universe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Redback Shroud
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Meridian Pathway
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Calming Gesture
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Tide Flippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Pouncing Paws
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Mask of Momentum
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Dead Threads
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Dead Threads that play both.
Peg Leg
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Peg Leg that play both.
Quick Clicks
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Quick Clicks that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Arousing Wave
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Orbitoclast
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Spitfire
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spitfire that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.802.801349325
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
Cog in the Machine
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cog in the Machine that play both.
Cogwerx Workshop
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Workshop that play both.
Copper Cog
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Copper Cog that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rage Specter that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.616000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Avast Ye! that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Loot the Hold that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Riggermortis that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Swabbie
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Swabbie that play both.
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Loan Shark that play both.
Perk Up
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Perk Up that play both.
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Give No Quarter
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Give No Quarter that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shifting Tides that play both.
Sapphire Amulet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sapphire Amulet that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.792.792816635
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.635294118
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.802.795318725
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.842.835788325
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.676339286
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.613166954
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.602.604766187
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.802.798483891
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.574754268
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.334521385
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.554821664
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.507926829
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Cogwerx Dovetail
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Dovetail that play both.
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Zeppelin (Blue) that play both.
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Zeppelin (Red) that play both.
Golden Skywarden
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Skywarden that play both.
Jolly Bludger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Jolly Bludger that play both.
Palantir Aeronought
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Palantir Aeronought that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.554597701
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.612.607181719
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.412.412031782
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.459134615
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.461725395
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.559948980
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.505350773
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.469755470
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.507462687
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Pilfer the Wreck (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pilfer the Wreck (Red) that play both.
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Zeppelin (Yellow) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Battalion Barque (Yellow) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Sky Skimmer (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sky Skimmer (Red) that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Censor that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.742.736679058
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.596207865
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.576980568
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.421825813
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.655131265
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.523444976
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.422.416267943
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.642.642760487
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.452.454317897
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.578729282
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.693721719
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.662.660098522
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.442.437837838
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Blood in the Water
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blood in the Water that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Pinion Sentry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pinion Sentry that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.430570506
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.551829268
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.