banner
Cut Down to Size (Red)
5603 decks (0.7822%)
Price History
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.523.518417871
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.592.593485297
Hero
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
252% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Uzuri
Uzuri
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
New
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Kayo, Underhanded Cheat that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Equipment
Okana Scar Wraps
Okana Scar Wraps
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Okana Scar Wraps that play both.
Robe of Autumn's Fall
Robe of Autumn's Fall
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
Iris of the Blossom
Iris of the Blossom
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
New
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Starting Point
Starting Point
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
New
Golden Gait
Golden Gait
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Gait that play both.
New
Golden Gauntlets
Golden Gauntlets
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Gauntlets that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Meridian Pathway
Meridian Pathway
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Calming Gesture
Calming Gesture
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
New
Adaptive Alpha Mold
Adaptive Alpha Mold
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Adaptive Alpha Mold that play both.
New
Golden Galea
Golden Galea
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Galea that play both.
New
Golden Heart Plate
Golden Heart Plate
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Heart Plate that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.756626506
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
New
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Booze! that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.616294350
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Rage Specter
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rage Specter that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Seek Vengeance
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Enact Vengeance
Enact Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enact Vengeance that play both.
Seek Vengeance (Red)
Seek Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Seek Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.878612717
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Vengeance Never Rests
Vengeance Never Rests
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vengeance Never Rests that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.801859800
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.638289963
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.798053528
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835660580
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.672655565
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.612807464
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.605590062
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.798669891
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.574272588
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.363425926
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Overcrowded that play both.
New
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Show of Strength that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Blue)
Bittering Thorns (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555628272
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.509298140
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.638013372
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
New
Outside Interference
Outside Interference
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Outside Interference that play both.
New
Buckwild (Blue)
Buckwild (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Buckwild (Blue) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Red)
Buckwild (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Buckwild (Red) that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vigorous Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.553130930
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Smash Up
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.412751678
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.570737606
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.460541814
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.464585834
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
New
The Old Switcheroo
The Old Switcheroo
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Old Switcheroo that play both.
New
Big Bully
Big Bully
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Big Bully that play both.
New
Reckless Stampede
Reckless Stampede
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Reckless Stampede that play both.
New
Bluster Buff
Bluster Buff
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bluster Buff that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Strongest Survive (Blue) that play both.
New
Chest Puff
Chest Puff
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Chest Puff that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.507058824
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.470365700
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Censor that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.433628319
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
New
Tear Down the Idols
Tear Down the Idols
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tear Down the Idols that play both.
New
Bully Tactics
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bully Tactics that play both.
New
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Smashing Ground that play both.
New
Tempest Palm Gustwave
Tempest Palm Gustwave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tempest Palm Gustwave that play both.
New
Buckwild (Yellow)
Buckwild (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Buckwild (Yellow) that play both.
New
Give 'Em a Piece of Your Mind (Blue)
Give 'Em a Piece of Your Mind (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Give 'Em a Piece of Your Mind (Blue) that play both.
New
Rough Up (Red)
Rough Up (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rough Up (Red) that play both.
New
Unexpected Backhand (Blue)
Unexpected Backhand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Unexpected Backhand (Blue) that play both.
New
Cutting Retort
Cutting Retort
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cutting Retort that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Legacy of Ikaru
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.735688185
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.597493036
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.581632653
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.435467980
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.527595884
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.655660377
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.626884422
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.420560748
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.456009913
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.581867388
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.703450092
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.665953807
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437165775
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
New
Hunter or Hunted?
Hunter or Hunted?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hunter or Hunted? that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Block
New
Steal Victory
Steal Victory
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Steal Victory that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.432989691
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.590425532
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.