Cut Down to Size (Red)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.523.519961011
Average Defense Value:
2.632.626085013
Formats
Number Played
Average number played (CC):
2.532.528670447
Average number played (Blitz):
1.881.877049180
Hero
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Flick Knives
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Crown of Providence
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Nullrune Boots
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Toxic Tips
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Redback Shroud
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Blossom of Spring
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.812.809989142
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.552.547945205
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.719409283
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.792.792951542
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.812.811866860
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.712.709636248
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.745354439
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.842.838760921
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.696159122
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.672.673333333
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
2.842.839000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.676422764
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.812.810061602
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.661417323
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.671775223
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.594002307
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
2.772.767441860
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.316571429
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.451612903
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.591772152
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.745867769
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
2.632.634146341
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Censor that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.582.578947368
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.552.552173913
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.576470588
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.505617978
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.521489971
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Yellow) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.772.771513353
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.612.608784474
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.616045845
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.681660900
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.616481775
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.662.656514382
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.392.393700787
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.482.484745763
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.443983402
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.652.653543307
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.736490589
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.722.719387755
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.442.442244224
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hold the Line that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.511749347
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.490842491
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.