Cut Down to Size (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.543.542301743
Average Defense Value:
2.602.603814726
Hero
Uzuri
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
New
Aurora, Shooting Star
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
New
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Enigma
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Flick Knives
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Arcane Lantern
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Nullrune Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Traverse the Universe
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Meridian Pathway
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Toxic Tips
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Balance of Justice
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Waves of Aqua Marine
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waves of Aqua Marine that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Redback Shroud
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Arousing Wave
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Sharp Shooters
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sharp Shooters that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Savage Sash
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Knucklehead
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Shriek Razors
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Star Fall
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Graven Call
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Teklo Leveler
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Teklo Leveler that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.732.734567901
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.802.797668609
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rage Specter that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.643895349
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.662.663594470
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Line It Up
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Line It Up that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Essence of Ancestry: Mind that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.782.784393324
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.640768223
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.792.794813980
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.842.835866261
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.690680101
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.628310063
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.612.613567839
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
2.832.831254585
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.802.796711510
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.590670554
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.575916230
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.510290987
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.289367429
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.575076609
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.417929293
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.457106274
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.519230769
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.472.473404255
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.584415584
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.542.540284360
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.488687783
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.514388489
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Second Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.506172840
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Censor that play both.
Terminator Tank
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Terminator Tank that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
War Machine
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and War Machine that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.732.734275618
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.595921450
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.563354603
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.658176944
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.380108992
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.533018868
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.402.401333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.642.638081395
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.442.440379404
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.576547231
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Siren's Call
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Siren's Call that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.682763744
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Saving Grace that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.662.656212304
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.442.437500000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hold the Line that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.443820225
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Dense Blue Mist
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Dense Blue Mist that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.491193738
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.