banner
Cut Down to Size (Red)
4582 decks (0.8744%)
Price History
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.523.522559801
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.602.599986049
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔ‘i
Jarl VetreiΔ‘i
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Jarl VetreiΔ‘i that play both.
Uzuri
Uzuri
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
Ollin Ice Cap
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
Root-Bound Trunks
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Tectonic Crust
Tectonic Crust
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Heavy Industry Ram Stop
Heavy Industry Ram Stop
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heavy Industry Ram Stop that play both.
Calming Gesture
Calming Gesture
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Meridian Pathway
Meridian Pathway
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Heavy Industry Power Plant
Heavy Industry Power Plant
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heavy Industry Power Plant that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Waves of Aqua Marine
Waves of Aqua Marine
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waves of Aqua Marine that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Knucklehead
Knucklehead
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
Summit, the Unforgiving
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800936768
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.772058824
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Rage Specter
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rage Specter that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636363636
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Cerebellum Processor
Cerebellum Processor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cerebellum Processor that play both.
Astral Etchings (Red)
Astral Etchings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Astral Etchings (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.788856305
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636473918
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.793030623
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836477987
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.679830748
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.617926664
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.608552632
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.834246575
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.796270718
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.578227571
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.567927171
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.508430610
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.299059929
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Smash Up
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.705882353
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.559723593
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.413095238
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.631578947
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.455457967
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.561426684
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.469182390
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.508014797
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.472602740
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.530864198
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Amnesia
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Hand Behind the Pen
Hand Behind the Pen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hand Behind the Pen that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.736321688
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.598253275
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.569786535
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.652985075
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400468384
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.525654450
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.404255319
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636235955
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.456996149
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.584821429
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.687194526
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.656938044
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.438596491
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.447015834
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.535472973
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.