banner
Cut Down to Size (Red)
5278 decks (0.8018%)
Price History
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.513.509575577
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.602.597216209
Hero
Uzuri
Uzuri
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Puffin, Hightail
Puffin, Hightail
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Puffin, Hightail that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Gravy Bones
Gravy Bones
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Gravy Bones that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
Compass of Sunken Depths
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Starting Point
Starting Point
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
Gold-Baited Hook
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Cogwerx Tinker Rings
Cogwerx Tinker Rings
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Tinker Rings that play both.
Unicycle
Unicycle
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Unicycle that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Meridian Pathway
Meridian Pathway
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Calming Gesture
Calming Gesture
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Dead Threads
Dead Threads
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Dead Threads that play both.
Peg Leg
Peg Leg
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Peg Leg that play both.
Quick Clicks
Quick Clicks
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Quick Clicks that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
Swiftstrike Bracers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Spitfire
Spitfire
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spitfire that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.801349325
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
Cog in the Machine
Cog in the Machine
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cog in the Machine that play both.
Cogwerx Workshop
Cogwerx Workshop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Workshop that play both.
Copper Cog
Copper Cog
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Copper Cog that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.250000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Rage Specter
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rage Specter that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.616000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Avast Ye! that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Loot the Hold
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Loot the Hold that play both.
Riggermortis
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Riggermortis that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Swabbie
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Swabbie that play both.
Wailer Humperdinck
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
Loan Shark
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Loan Shark that play both.
Perk Up
Perk Up
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Perk Up that play both.
Chart the High Seas
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Give No Quarter
Give No Quarter
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Give No Quarter that play both.
Portside Exchange
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Shifting Tides
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shifting Tides that play both.
Sapphire Amulet
Sapphire Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sapphire Amulet that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.792816635
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.635294118
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.795318725
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835788325
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.676339286
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.613166954
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.604766187
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.798483891
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.574754268
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.334521385
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554821664
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.507926829
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Smash Up
Smash Up
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Cogwerx Dovetail
Cogwerx Dovetail
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Dovetail that play both.
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Blue)
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Zeppelin (Blue) that play both.
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Red)
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Zeppelin (Red) that play both.
Golden Skywarden
Golden Skywarden
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Skywarden that play both.
Jolly Bludger
Jolly Bludger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Jolly Bludger that play both.
Palantir Aeronought
Palantir Aeronought
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Palantir Aeronought that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554597701
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.607181719
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.412031782
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.459134615
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.461725395
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.559948980
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.505350773
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.469755470
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.507462687
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Pilfer the Wreck (Red)
Pilfer the Wreck (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pilfer the Wreck (Red) that play both.
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Yellow)
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cogwerx Zeppelin (Yellow) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Battalion Barque (Yellow) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Sky Skimmer (Red)
Sky Skimmer (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sky Skimmer (Red) that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Censor that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.736679058
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.596207865
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.576980568
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.421825813
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.655131265
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.523444976
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.416267943
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642760487
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454317897
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.578729282
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.693721719
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.660098522
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437837838
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Blood in the Water
Blood in the Water
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blood in the Water that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Pinion Sentry
Pinion Sentry
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pinion Sentry that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.430570506
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.551829268
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.