Cut Down to Size (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, if they have 4 or more cards in hand, they discard a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.523.518448872
Average Defense Value:
2.602.598263763
Hero
Uzuri
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Flick Knives
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Toxic Tips
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Traverse the Universe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Meridian Pathway
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Redback Shroud
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Calming Gesture
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Tide Flippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Pouncing Paws
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Arousing Wave
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Mask of Momentum
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Savage Sash
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Orbitoclast
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.802.801364670
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.772.772471910
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rage Specter that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.626538988
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.792.790616518
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.632495164
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.792.793208312
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.842.835450028
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.675454545
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.610650371
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.602.603825137
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.802.798709677
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.572703412
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.323125660
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.560432140
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.503109453
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.554158607
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.602.600891862
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.412.408564815
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.456654457
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.458333333
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.506024096
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.545945946
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.469038208
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Deliberation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Destructive Deliberation (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Censor that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.742.735312697
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.595425304
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.567816092
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.417735043
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.655380895
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.517140059
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.412.413333333
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.642.641095890
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.452.454659950
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.577903683
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.690504103
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.662.658627087
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.442.435261708
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.432885906
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.548989114
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Down to Size (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.