Humble (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, that hero loses all abilities until the end of their next turn. (Treat the hero card as if the text box is empty.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.743.740792170
Average Defense Value:
2.582.582472337
Hero
Uzuri
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Flick Knives
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Savage Sash
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Arcane Lantern
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Skullhorn
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Nullrune Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Mask of Perdition
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Hide Tanner
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Hide Tanner that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Beaten Trackers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Traverse the Universe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Tide Flippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Momentum
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Knucklehead
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Redback Shroud
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Meridian Pathway
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Well Grounded
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Calming Gesture
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Arousing Wave
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Mandible Claw
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Graven Call
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Action
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.492.488748875
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Cast Bones
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cast Bones that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.652.649076517
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Rage Specter that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.802.799390987
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.812.805184903
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.832.834503745
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.760402979
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.802.797217637
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
2.822.820078547
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.706580125
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.742.743331656
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.792.791666667
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.718502899
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.733509235
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.671652954
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.633240112
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.542.535226078
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.548439182
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
2.502.496544391
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.556227328
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Show No Mercy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Show No Mercy that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.484773151
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Skull Crack that play both.
Splatter Skull
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Splatter Skull that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Pack Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pack Call (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Censor that play both.
Riled Up (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Riled Up (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.752.752475248
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.594293211
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.588433938
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.583378305
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.505441354
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.512.510756419
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.814643956
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.742.742886387
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.542.537487335
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.483778966
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.565656566
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
No Fear
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and No Fear that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.