Humble (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, that hero loses all abilities until the end of their next turn. (Treat the hero card as if the text box is empty.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.663.662074672
Average Defense Value:
2.612.610678763
Hero
Uzuri
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Crown of Providence
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Flick Knives
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Nullrune Hood
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Skullhorn
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Nullrune Boots
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mask of Perdition
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Redback Shroud
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Tide Flippers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Mask of Momentum
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Shriek Razors
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Toxic Tips
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Mandible Claw
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.822.823293173
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Cast Bones
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cast Bones that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.562.563971341
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Talk a Big Game that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.792.789099917
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.812.805951170
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.832.830905456
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.759784076
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.852.847533632
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.792.788692176
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
2.812.814559617
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.716405828
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.742.744421303
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.721696674
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
2.762.759670782
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played:
2.792.792013311
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.752563531
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.675579323
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.643984221
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Show No Mercy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Show No Mercy that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.482.480020758
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Pack Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pack Call (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
2.442.436817473
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Skull Crack that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Smashing Performance
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Smashing Performance that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.449744463
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.468103448
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Censor that play both.
Down and Dirty
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Down and Dirty that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.752.745229327
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.591199699
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.558564232
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
1.621.620933522
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.561132561
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.467921300
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.502.495894910
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.802607691
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.732.729382164
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.542.540071770
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.471837488
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
No Fear
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and No Fear that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.533373422
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.