Humble (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, that hero loses all abilities until the end of their next turn. (Treat the hero card as if the text box is empty.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.743.743245406
Average Defense Value:
2.572.573596872
Hero
Uzuri
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Equipment
Okana Scar Wraps
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Okana Scar Wraps that play both.
Robe of Autumn's Fall
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Iris of the Blossom
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Flick Knives
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Crown of Providence
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Savage Sash
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Skullhorn
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Tide Flippers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Mask of Momentum
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Pouncing Paws
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Balance of Justice
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Hide Tanner
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Hide Tanner that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Beaten Trackers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Starting Point
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Knucklehead
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Redback Shroud
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Old Knocker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Orbitoclast
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Mandible Claw
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Action
Dual Threat
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.682.683056478
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Cast Bones
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cast Bones that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Seek Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Seek Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Enact Vengeance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Enact Vengeance that play both.
Vengeance Never Rests
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Vengeance Never Rests that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
2.552.545454545
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.822.815493671
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.812.814105711
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.765966047
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.812.805465192
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.700042070
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.752.746197719
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.782.780883679
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.718200101
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played:
2.772.767441860
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sea Legs that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.612.605892297
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.674204947
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.640881913
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Censor that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.579814189
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.586075346
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Smash Up
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Smash Up that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
2.502.499289436
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.499739448
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Riled Up (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Riled Up (Blue) that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Skull Crack that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Call for Backup
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Call for Backup that play both.
Attack Reaction
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.762.755510514
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.593819688
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.602919162
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.555129434
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.587931924
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.830548226
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.752.754551946
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.532.531370656
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.486223663
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.595573441
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.