Humble (Red)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.513.508714784
Average Defense Value:
2.632.625349849
Formats
Number Played
Average number played (CC):
2.512.514640028
Average number played (Blitz):
1.801.804621849
Hero
Uzuri
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Uzuri that play both.
New
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Pouncing Paws
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Crown of Providence
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Flick Knives
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Nullrune Boots
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mask of Perdition
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Redback Shroud
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Skullhorn
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Toxic Tips
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Tide Flippers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Mask of Momentum
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Ironsong Versus
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Blossom of Spring
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Weapon
Nerve Scalpel
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Spider's Bite
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Orbitoclast
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Scale Peeler
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Mandible Claw
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Romping Club
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Romping Club that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.792.791956690
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.382.377314815
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.752.754634678
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
2.762.762755102
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.742.740259740
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.711462451
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.812.807037457
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.732.727986540
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
2.772.775000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.702222222
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.792.786915888
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Growl
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Growl that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Mauling Qi that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.663476874
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.673292999
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.728830645
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.732.729490022
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
2.652.650000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Infiltrate that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.572.568206230
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
2.572.567307692
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Censor that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.667146974
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.487148103
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.662.664505673
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sedate (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.643207856
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
2.652.650623886
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.533551555
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Amnesia
Avg. played:
2.482.480769231
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Amnesia that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.499222395
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.600389864
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.565557730
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Wreck Havoc (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.504456328
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Wreck Havoc (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Down and Dirty
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Down and Dirty that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Skull Crack that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.702.704236006
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.604996097
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.605995717
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.352.354799514
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.592.585078534
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.502873563
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.518292683
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.592592593
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.512.510673235
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.797276853
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.722.717178771
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.582.575163399
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.536659878
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.587561375
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Humble (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.