banner
Sedate (Blue)
5117 decks (0.7062%)
Price History
Sedate (Blue)
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth When this hits a hero, create an Inertia token under their control.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.043.042861307
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.752.752967943
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Uzuri
Uzuri
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Uzuri that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Nuu
Nuu
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Nuu that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Equipment
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Flick Knives that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Old Knocker that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Danger Digits that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Toxic Tips that play both.
New
Garland of Spring
Garland of Spring
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Garland of Spring that play both.
Starting Point
Starting Point
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Starting Point that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
Mask of Shifting Perspectives
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Mask of Shifting Perspectives that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Shriek Razors that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Orbitoclast that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Graven Call that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.817117776
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Riddle with Regret
Riddle with Regret
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Riddle with Regret that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.626780627
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554517134
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Attack Action
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.814986930
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.823956443
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.831742243
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.841152815
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.702702703
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.827357238
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.819700661
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Shake Down that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.685352019
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836094159
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Already Dead that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.523416711
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.810810811
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.859817814
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.775478531
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800821355
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.649822695
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.539909639
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Wither (Blue)
Wither (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.456257356
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Wither (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.391866913
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666843501
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.591397849
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.319434629
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.755833333
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Eradicate that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Overcrowded that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.704697987
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.621160410
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.585858586
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Infiltrate that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.685185185
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.637931034
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.317991632
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636174636
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.673819742
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Yellow)
Infect (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Infect (Yellow) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.525243578
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.364071856
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.583333333
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.250000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.496015936
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Censor that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.376344086
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Sneak Attack (Red)
Sneak Attack (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.460674157
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Sneak Attack (Red) that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Give and Take that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Erase Face that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Standing Order that play both.
Back Stab (Red)
Back Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.461273666
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Back Stab (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Yellow)
Prowl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Prowl (Yellow) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.523178808
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Malign (Red)
Malign (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Malign (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Mind's Desire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Mind's Desire (Blue) that play both.
Amnesia
Amnesia
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Amnesia that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.823225806
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Just a Nick that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.738287561
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.715625000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Siren's Call
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.822784810
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Siren's Call that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.650434783
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.235610130
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.505112474
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.313868613
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
1.981.980156344
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.323271665
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.355472404
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.444976077
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Razor's Edge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Razor's Edge (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.524361949
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.484356895
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.542324247
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Spike with Inertia
Spike with Inertia
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Spike with Inertia that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
Spike with Frailty
Spike with Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Spike with Frailty that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.743204164
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Hunter or Hunted?
Hunter or Hunted?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Hunter or Hunted? that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.718887262
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.385889129
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.292600897
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.453666398
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.514784946
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Resource
New
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Authority of Ataya that play both.
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sedate (Blue) and Plague Hive that play both.