Hold 'em (Blue)
Warrior Action
Your next Warrior attack this turn gets +1{p} and "When this attacks a hero, you may wager a Vigor token with them." (When the chain link resolves, if the attack hit, you create a Vigor token, otherwise they create one.)
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.241.242700113
Average Defense Value: Β
2.632.634505581
Hero
Equipment
Prized Galea
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Prized Galea that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Refraction Bolters
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Boots
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Ironsong Versus
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Gallantry Gold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Parry Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Parry Blade that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Providence
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Beckon Applause
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Vigor Girth
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Bastion of Unity
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Bastion of Unity that play both.
Base of the Mountain
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Weapon
Decimator Great Axe
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hot Streak
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Merciless Battleaxe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Merciless Battleaxe that play both.
Action
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.710944169
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
2.772.765936255
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.718473809
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.708119658
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.662.656742126
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Double Down that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.488141202
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.702.696581197
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750394945
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Spill Blood that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689047262
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.612.613433859
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.662.658318426
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727090636
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727580372
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Cleave that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Spoils of War that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608383234
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.624386826
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Unsheathed that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.604490501
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.576853526
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Truce that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.471744472
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.510230179
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.463726885
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.520527859
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Sharpen Steel (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.616691654
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.595863611
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.697254902
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Runner Runner that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.493430657
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.792.794429470
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Up the Ante that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.862.857142857
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Provoke that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
2.822.820376088
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.709394205
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.726879862
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.743243243
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.755835668
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.772.774319066
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.747935891
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.594583670
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
2.792.789119462
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.647529412
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.674225246
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.337698784
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608653846
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
2.072.073149742
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Rout that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.755507141
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.702.698078344
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.765635286
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.735899137
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
2.392.388853705
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.517319277
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β
2.592.590909091
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Slap-Happy that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.492307692
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hold 'em (Blue) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
