Sift (Blue)
Generic Action
Put up to 2 cards from your hand on the bottom of your deck, then draw that many cards.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.712.713638450
Average Defense Value: Β
2.572.574153432
Hero
Valda Brightaxe
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
New
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
Enigma
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Enigma that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire that play both.
Viserai, Rune Blood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
New
Aurora, Shooting Star
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
New
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Traverse the Universe
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Boots
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Meridian Pathway
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Balance of Justice
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Mage Master Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Crown of Dominion
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcane Lantern
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Crater Fist
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Crater Fist that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Teklo Base Legs
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Teklo Base Legs that play both.
Civic Steps
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Civic Steps that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Teklo Base Arms
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Teklo Base Arms that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Ironhide Legs
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Bloodied Oval
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Storm Striders
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Aether Ironweave
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Waves of Aqua Marine
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Waves of Aqua Marine that play both.
Ironrot Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Aqua Laps
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Aqua Laps that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Weapon
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Tiger Taming Khakkara
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Titan's Fist
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Teklo Plasma Pistol
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Teklo Plasma Pistol that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Anothos
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Anothos that play both.
Scepter of Pain
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Reaping Blade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Teklo Leveler
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Teklo Leveler that play both.
Action
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.592.591083782
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β
2.832.827338129
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Rage Specter that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.682.679221594
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.665925102
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β
2.762.759842520
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.782.777327935
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.446207238
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.492.493607560
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Sift (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.410690122
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sift (Red) that play both.
Spark of Genius
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Spark of Genius that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Looming Doom that play both.
Potion of Luck
Avg. played: Β
2.522.524513096
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Potion of Luck that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Force of Nature
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Force of Nature that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.002.001958864
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Plasma Purifier
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Plasma Purifier that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.602.598953793
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Energy Potion that play both.
Induction Chamber
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Induction Chamber that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Essence of Ancestry: Mind that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Tectonic Rift
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tectonic Rift that play both.
Song of Yesteryears
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Song of Yesteryears that play both.
Astral Etchings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Astral Etchings (Red) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Encore
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Encore that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Song of Sweet Nectar
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Song of Sweet Nectar that play both.
Singularity
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Singularity that play both.
10,000 Year Reunion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and 10,000 Year Reunion that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Vengeful Apparition (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Vengeful Apparition (Blue) that play both.
Burdens of the Past
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Burdens of the Past that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Song of the Shining Knight
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Song of the Shining Knight that play both.
Anthem of Spring
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Anthem of Spring that play both.
Attack Action
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
2.792.787610619
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.772.770903010
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.642.641958670
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Chase the Tail that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.282.275263484
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
2.642.640506329
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Ripple Away that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
1.391.390728477
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Pulverize that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Final Act that play both.
Meganetic Protocol
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Meganetic Protocol that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Second Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Throttle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Throttle (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
2.532.530288910
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Yellow) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Pulsewave Protocol
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Pulsewave Protocol that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Payload (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Payload (Blue) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Terminator Tank
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Terminator Tank that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.703771662
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.722.715045355
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.680289705
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666895604
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and That All You Got? that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
2.602.597464342
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Hold the Line that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Unravel Aggression
Avg. played: Β
2.472.467889908
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Unravel Aggression that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Block
Firewall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Firewall (Red) that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β
2.792.792642140
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.594197138
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.646525680
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.
Dense Blue Mist
Avg. played: Β
2.622.624161074
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Dense Blue Mist that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Brainstorm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Brainstorm that play both.
Three Visits
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Three Visits that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.