Sift (Blue)
Generic Action
Put up to 2 cards from your hand on the bottom of your deck, then draw that many cards.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.642.642112178
Average Defense Value: Β
2.602.595229243
Hero
Jarl VetreiΓ°i
2450% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Jarl VetreiΓ°i that play both.
Valda Brightaxe
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Viserai, Rune Blood
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
1900% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
600% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
450% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Heavy Industry Gear Shift
400% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Heavy Industry Gear Shift that play both.
Heavy Industry Surveillance
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Heavy Industry Surveillance that play both.
Tectonic Crust
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Heavy Industry Power Plant
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Heavy Industry Power Plant that play both.
Sealace Sarong
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Traverse the Universe
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Calming Gesture
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Meridian Pathway
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Mage Master Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Dominion
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Crater Fist
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Crater Fist that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Balance of Justice
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Civic Steps
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Civic Steps that play both.
Face Purgatory
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Teklo Base Arms
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Teklo Base Arms that play both.
Well Grounded
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Well Grounded that play both.
Crown of Reflection
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Teklo Base Legs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Teklo Base Legs that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Ironhide Legs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Silent Stilettos
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Aether Ironweave
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Bloodied Oval
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Glidewell Fins
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Glidewell Fins that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
600% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Titan's Fist
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Teklo Plasma Pistol
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Teklo Plasma Pistol that play both.
Anothos
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Anothos that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Rosetta Thorn
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Reaping Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Reaping Blade that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Tiger Taming Khakkara
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Scepter of Pain
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811320755
2150% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
2.622.620689655
950% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
850% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Cerebellum Processor
Avg. played: Β
2.832.833333333
550% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Cerebellum Processor that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.902.904411765
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Big Game Trophy Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Big Game Trophy Shot that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
2.782.780000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Rage Specter that play both.
Gold the Tip
Avg. played: Β
2.822.820512821
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Gold the Tip that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.762.763676963
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727822581
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Truce that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600043975
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Spectral Manifestations (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Spectral Manifestations (Red) that play both.
Astral Etchings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Astral Etchings (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.673982188
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Call in the Big Guns (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.742.738699008
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.443376515
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
2.342.342105263
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Loan Shark that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Essence of Ancestry: Mind that play both.
Spark of Genius
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Spark of Genius that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Shifting Tides that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Sift (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.416810593
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sift (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.492.492561983
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Potion of Luck
Avg. played: Β
2.512.507728894
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Potion of Luck that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Germinate that play both.
Plasma Purifier
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Plasma Purifier that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Call in the Big Guns (Blue) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Looming Doom that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Energy Potion that play both.
Drop the Anchor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Drop the Anchor that play both.
Induction Chamber
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Induction Chamber that play both.
Force of Nature
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Force of Nature that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.022.015070491
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
10,000 Year Reunion
Avg. played: Β
2.502.501075269
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and 10,000 Year Reunion that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Tectonic Rift
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tectonic Rift that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Essence of Ancestry: Body that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Attack Action
Fast and Furious
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Fast and Furious that play both.
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
2.922.920731707
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
2.932.925465839
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
2.922.924528302
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.782.782608696
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.812.814273050
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.692.687438825
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Barbed Barrage
Avg. played: Β
2.752.745098039
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Barbed Barrage that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
2.742.736842105
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Ripple Away that play both.
Rusty Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
2.662.660000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Rusty Harpoon that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Second Tenet of Chi: Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Second Tenet of Chi: Wind that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β
2.182.181695828
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Pulverize that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Plow Under that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Phantasmaclasm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Phantasmaclasm that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Chase the Tail that play both.
Throttle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Throttle (Blue) that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Final Act that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Swift Shot that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Meganetic Protocol
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Meganetic Protocol that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.742215271
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.842.841091493
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.752.746502401
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.633858268
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
2.682.678848283
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and That All You Got? that play both.
Put in Context
Avg. played: Β
2.632.635000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Put in Context that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Hold the Line that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
2.412.411764706
450% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Return Fire
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Return Fire that play both.
Firewall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Firewall (Red) that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Pass Over that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Stir the Pot that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.752486188
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.622935780
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.693125712
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Dense Blue Mist
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Dense Blue Mist that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Brainstorm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Brainstorm that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Blue) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.