banner
Agile Engagement (Red)
4648 decks (0.6119%)
Price History
Agile Engagement (Red)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +3{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.081.081945240
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.682.675506950
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kassai
Kassai
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea that play both.
Olympia
Olympia
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Olympia that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
New
Helm of Unity
Helm of Unity
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Helm of Unity that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
Hood of Red Sand
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Weapon
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.904580153
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.822995461
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.690593248
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.867426204
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.423326960
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.825130284
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.838494232
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.739386792
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.472010748
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.616886847
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.741666667
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.573405073
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.715157681
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.532195500
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.426621160
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.405687204
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.383806519
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Midas Touch that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.540740741
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Dauntless (Red)
Dauntless (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dauntless (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.505535055
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.581395349
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600644122
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.512383901
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.541595925
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
Spill Blood
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Driving Blade (Blue)
Driving Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Driving Blade (Blue) that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.544444444
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Beat of the Ironsong
Beat of the Ironsong
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Beat of the Ironsong that play both.
New
Swordmaster's Shine
Swordmaster's Shine
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.200000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Swordmaster's Shine that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852980132
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870967742
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.831825658
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.855242967
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.599705666
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.395833333
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.401731161
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.725806452
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.331.328697851
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Rout that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.537401575
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.255935148
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.499688861
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510703364
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.526627219
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.488505747
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.402521823
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.162.164124909
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.371.371837184
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Red) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.378672470
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.342657343
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Run Through
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.594147583
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Run Through that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.359223301
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.511073254
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.728041902
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.509523810
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Block
New
Blunten
Blunten
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.250000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blunten that play both.
Instant
New
Shatter Sorcery
Shatter Sorcery
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Shatter Sorcery that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.414100486
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.357971014
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Pride
Ironsong Pride
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Pride that play both.
Resource
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Authority of Ataya that play both.