Agile Engagement (Red)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +3{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.101.103388708
Average Defense Value: Β
2.672.670732997
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kassai
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Dorinthea
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea that play both.
Olympia
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Olympia that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Gallantry Gold
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Boots
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Prized Galea
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Ironsong Versus
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Old Knocker
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Balance of Justice
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Vigor Girth
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Beckon Applause
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Parry Blade
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Parry Blade that play both.
Crown of Dominion
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Weapon
Dawnblade
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hot Streak
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
2.872.865429234
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.653253103
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.422.417881056
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.702.697278912
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
2.822.824624625
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β
2.852.846103896
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.833773087
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.395250660
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700074794
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547735192
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.582.575949367
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.712.711267606
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.713242961
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.531714957
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.415859031
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.377013963
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
2.712.713483146
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.539205156
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.320402299
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.462.459951456
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.506188119
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.580996885
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.598673300
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.513302034
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.546594982
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Driving Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Driving Blade (Blue) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.522292994
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.712.706447188
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.544141252
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.485260771
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
2.842.835447905
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811339198
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.822.823943662
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.732.725563910
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.832.831102613
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.548122572
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729208250
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.221.217948718
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Rout that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.682.682579564
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.512.506550218
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.529451138
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.573717949
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.518825301
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
2.312.305240793
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.481203008
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.389289392
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.162.159207630
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.370660694
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.334289813
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played: Β
2.602.598937583
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Run Through that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.346376812
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.471.468750000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.514035088
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.431683168
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played: Β
2.082.076271186
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Out for Blood (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.695509822
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.762.764705882
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.492.494549058
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.594392523
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
2.422.418018018
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.336956522
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Pride
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Pride that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.