banner
Agile Engagement (Red)
3610 decks (0.6705%)
Price History
Agile Engagement (Red)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +3{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.101.103268860
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.672.666663147
Hero
Kassai
Kassai
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea that play both.
Olympia
Olympia
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Olympia that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
Hood of Red Sand
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Parry Blade
Parry Blade
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Parry Blade that play both.
Weapon
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833333333
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.656481886
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.406642729
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.829842932
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.837652439
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833074534
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.399755501
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.697177074
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
New
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.580944351
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.688000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.723946785
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.543478261
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
New
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.702026222
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.525423729
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.420142421
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.387654321
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.528623630
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.449541284
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.316393443
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.655172414
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.490168539
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.579584775
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.608058608
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.492857143
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.543340381
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
Spill Blood
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.536130536
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Driving Blade (Blue)
Driving Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Driving Blade (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Attack Action
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.690962099
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.550621670
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.482412060
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.909090909
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
New
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.825285338
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.802572707
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826538176
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.545222279
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.743532890
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.211.212689902
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Rout that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.539611360
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.680118110
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.531144781
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.311638591
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.335279399
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.494874185
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.162.161163522
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.386815920
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.376923077
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Run Through
Run Through
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.606413994
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Run Through that play both.
New
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.332767402
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.667863555
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.344086022
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.471.465266559
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510476190
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.428904429
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
New
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Perforate that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played: Β 
2.062.063926941
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Out for Blood (Blue)
Out for Blood (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.705414013
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.502242152
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.588822355
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.411205074
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.342419080
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Pride
Ironsong Pride
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Pride that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.