Agile Engagement (Red)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +3{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.071.073023967
Average Defense Value:
2.682.680928048
Hero
Dorinthea
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea that play both.
Kassai
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Olympia
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Olympia that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Prized Galea
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Nullrune Boots
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Ironsong Versus
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Balance of Justice
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Gallantry Gold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Vigor Girth
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Beckon Applause
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Blossom of Spring
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Weapon
Dawnblade
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hot Streak
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.712.711627907
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
2.852.850899743
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played:
2.852.848684211
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.850847458
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.442.444693572
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.852.854345165
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
2.602.597165992
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
2.702.699147381
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.487684729
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.742.741741742
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.584196891
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.593874834
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played:
2.722.722222222
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played:
2.422.419773096
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.682.676300578
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.600753296
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.477396022
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.587628866
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.442.440087146
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.618226601
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.644908616
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.400537634
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.585831063
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.532.531914894
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Raise an Army that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cleave that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.411.407801418
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.702.704504505
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.631299735
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.542.542968750
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.842.840146431
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
2.822.818319455
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played:
2.842.841991342
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.616372392
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.782838983
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played:
1.201.201226994
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Rout that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.626589595
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played:
2.732.728997290
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.612.609911055
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
2.312.312000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.321695761
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.572.569343066
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.142.135265700
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played:
2.592.593632959
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Run Through that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.413566740
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.447427293
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.497826087
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.352.347432024
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.363354037
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.522.522727273
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.467153285
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.774268105
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.552.546979866
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.589595376
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.392.386986301
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.377833753
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Pride
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Pride that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Red) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.