Medkit
Mechanologist Action - Item
Action -- Put this on the bottom of its owner's deck: Gain 2{g}
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.272.272869683
Average Defense Value: Β
1.901.903383574
Hero
Dash I/O
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Dash I/O that play both.
Puffin, Hightail
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Puffin, Hightail that play both.
Dash, Database
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Dash, Database that play both.
Data Doll MKII
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Data Doll MKII that play both.
Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate that play both.
Equipment
Achilles Accelerator
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Cogwerx Tinker Rings
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cogwerx Tinker Rings that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Teklo Foundry Heart
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Teklo Foundry Heart that play both.
Crown of Providence
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Crown of Providence that play both.
Heavy Industry Ram Stop
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Heavy Industry Ram Stop that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Cogwerx Base Arms
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cogwerx Base Arms that play both.
Adaptive Plating
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Adaptive Plating that play both.
Adaptive Dissolver
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Adaptive Dissolver that play both.
Cogwerx Base Head
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cogwerx Base Head that play both.
Cogwerx Base Legs
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cogwerx Base Legs that play both.
Cogwerx Base Chest
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cogwerx Base Chest that play both.
Balance of Justice
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Balance of Justice that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Teklo Base Arms
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Teklo Base Arms that play both.
Galvanic Bender
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Galvanic Bender that play both.
Teklo Base Legs
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Teklo Base Legs that play both.
Unicycle
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Unicycle that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Evo Recall
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Recall that play both.
Breaker Helm Protos
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Breaker Helm Protos that play both.
Puffer Jacket
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Puffer Jacket that play both.
Teklo Base Head
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Teklo Base Head that play both.
Proto Base Arms
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Proto Base Arms that play both.
Misfire Dampener
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Misfire Dampener that play both.
Proto Base Legs
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Proto Base Legs that play both.
Proto Base Head
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Proto Base Head that play both.
Proto Base Chest
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Proto Base Chest that play both.
Ironhide Legs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Teklo Base Chest
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Teklo Base Chest that play both.
Evo Shortcircuit
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Shortcircuit that play both.
Evo Heartdrive
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Heartdrive that play both.
Evo Speedslip
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Speedslip that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Old Knocker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Old Knocker that play both.
Weapon
Symbiosis Shot
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Symbiosis Shot that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Teklo Plasma Pistol
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Teklo Plasma Pistol that play both.
Spitfire
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Spitfire that play both.
Teklo Leveler
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Teklo Leveler that play both.
Cogwerx Blunderbuss
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cogwerx Blunderbuss that play both.
Action
Cog in the Machine
Avg. played: Β
2.922.923076923
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cog in the Machine that play both.
Spark of Genius
Avg. played: Β
2.802.800395257
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Spark of Genius that play both.
Dissolving Shield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.634234234
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Dissolving Shield (Red) that play both.
Teklo Core
Avg. played: Β
2.672.670756646
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Teklo Core that play both.
Mini Forcefield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.566473988
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Mini Forcefield (Red) that play both.
Cogwerx Workshop
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cogwerx Workshop that play both.
Boom Grenade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.528925620
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Boom Grenade (Red) that play both.
Null Time Zone
Avg. played: Β
2.192.185185185
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Null Time Zone that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
High Octane
Avg. played: Β
2.672.667896679
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and High Octane that play both.
Bios Update
Avg. played: Β
2.702.699588477
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Bios Update that play both.
Optekal Monocle
Avg. played: Β
2.032.030395137
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Optekal Monocle that play both.
Singularity
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Singularity that play both.
Boom Grenade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.452296820
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Boom Grenade (Yellow) that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played: Β
2.672.665217391
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played: Β
2.662.657777778
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Copper Cog
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Copper Cog that play both.
Tighten the Screws
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Tighten the Screws that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Midas Touch that play both.
Scrub the Deck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Scrub the Deck that play both.
Backup Protocol: RED
Avg. played: Β
2.112.106109325
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Backup Protocol: RED that play both.
Fuel Injector
Avg. played: Β
1.821.818750000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Fuel Injector that play both.
Micro-processor
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Micro-processor that play both.
Induction Chamber
Avg. played: Β
2.482.477366255
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Induction Chamber that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Memory
Avg. played: Β
2.642.637305699
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Steel Soul Memory that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Truce that play both.
Teklo Pounder
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Teklo Pounder that play both.
banned - Blitz
Hadron Collider (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.373626374
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Hadron Collider (Red) that play both.
Plasma Purifier
Avg. played: Β
2.502.497716895
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Plasma Purifier that play both.
Cognition Nodes
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cognition Nodes that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Processor
Avg. played: Β
2.622.618497110
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Steel Soul Processor that play both.
System Reset
Avg. played: Β
2.612.611428571
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and System Reset that play both.
Security Script
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Security Script that play both.
Grinding Gears
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Grinding Gears that play both.
Dissipation Shield
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Dissipation Shield that play both.
Signal Jammer
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Signal Jammer that play both.
Steam Canister
Avg. played: Β
2.082.079365079
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Steam Canister that play both.
Evo Sentry Base Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Sentry Base Legs that play both.
Quantum Processor
Avg. played: Β
2.592.586666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Quantum Processor that play both.
Evo Sentry Base Head
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Sentry Base Head that play both.
Evo Sentry Base Arms
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Sentry Base Arms that play both.
Prismatic Lens
Avg. played: Β
2.492.490683230
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Prismatic Lens that play both.
Evo Sentry Base Chest
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Evo Sentry Base Chest that play both.
Penetration Script
Avg. played: Β
2.442.437500000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Penetration Script that play both.
Mini Forcefield (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Mini Forcefield (Yellow) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and The Weakest Link that play both.
Boom Grenade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.506578947
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Boom Grenade (Blue) that play both.
Hyper Driver
Avg. played: Β
2.492.493150685
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Hyper Driver that play both.
Plasma Mainline
Avg. played: Β
1.491.492957746
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Plasma Mainline that play both.
Platinum Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Platinum Amulet that play both.
Draw Back the Hammer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Draw Back the Hammer that play both.
Goldwing Turbine (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Goldwing Turbine (Red) that play both.
Convection Amplifier
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Convection Amplifier that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.607394366
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Zero to Sixty (Red) that play both.
Palantir Aeronought
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Palantir Aeronought that play both.
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cogwerx Zeppelin (Blue) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Zipper Hit (Red) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.612987013
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Zero to Sixty (Blue) that play both.
Heist
Avg. played: Β
2.682.680597015
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Heist that play both.
T-Bone (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.703333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and T-Bone (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Golden Skywarden
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Golden Skywarden that play both.
Cogwerx Dovetail
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cogwerx Dovetail that play both.
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cogwerx Zeppelin (Red) that play both.
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cogwerx Zeppelin (Yellow) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Throttle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.688135593
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Throttle (Red) that play both.
T-Bone (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.588607595
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and T-Bone (Red) that play both.
Throttle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.716599190
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Throttle (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Command and Conquer that play both.
Expedite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.529010239
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Expedite (Red) that play both.
MetEx (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.587786260
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and MetEx (Red) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.659388646
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Zipper Hit (Blue) that play both.
Junkyard Dogg (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Junkyard Dogg (Blue) that play both.
Pulsewave Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
2.682.679611650
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Pulsewave Harpoon that play both.
Data Link (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.448818898
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Data Link (Red) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Cloud Skiff (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cloud Skiff (Blue) that play both.
HMS Marlin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and HMS Marlin that play both.
Sprocket Rocket (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.312.313131313
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Sprocket Rocket (Red) that play both.
Dive Through Data (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.484375000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Dive Through Data (Red) that play both.
Terminator Tank
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Terminator Tank that play both.
Expedite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.621052632
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Expedite (Blue) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.544600939
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Zero to Sixty (Yellow) that play both.
Scrap Harvester (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Scrap Harvester (Blue) that play both.
Junkyard Dogg (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.630057803
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Junkyard Dogg (Red) that play both.
War Machine
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and War Machine that play both.
Twin Drive
Avg. played: Β
2.542.538461538
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Twin Drive that play both.
Dumpster Dive (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Dumpster Dive (Red) that play both.
Meganetic Protocol
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Meganetic Protocol that play both.
Zipper Hit (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.593750000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Zipper Hit (Yellow) that play both.
Scrap Harvester (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Scrap Harvester (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Under Loop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.511627907
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Under Loop (Red) that play both.
Infuse Titanium (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Infuse Titanium (Red) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Data Link (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.541095890
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Data Link (Blue) that play both.
Hyper Scrapper
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Hyper Scrapper that play both.
Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Liquid-Cooled Mayhem (Blue) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Ripple Away that play both.
Soup Up (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Soup Up (Red) that play both.
Steel Street Hoons
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Steel Street Hoons that play both.
Meganetic Shockwave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Meganetic Shockwave that play both.
Mechanical Strength (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Mechanical Strength (Blue) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Jolly Bludger
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Jolly Bludger that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Cloud Skiff (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cloud Skiff (Red) that play both.
Cloud Skiff (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cloud Skiff (Yellow) that play both.
Sky Skimmer (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Sky Skimmer (Blue) that play both.
Sky Skimmer (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Sky Skimmer (Red) that play both.
Sky Skimmer (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Sky Skimmer (Yellow) that play both.
Cloud City Steamboat (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cloud City Steamboat (Blue) that play both.
Cloud City Steamboat (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cloud City Steamboat (Red) that play both.
Cloud City Steamboat (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cloud City Steamboat (Yellow) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Sea Legs that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Rally the Coast Guard (Yellow) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
HMS Barracuda
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and HMS Barracuda that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Scrap Hopper (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Scrap Hopper (Blue) that play both.
Scrap Compactor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Scrap Compactor (Blue) that play both.
Out Pace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Out Pace (Red) that play both.
Maximum Velocity
Avg. played: Β
2.492.488549618
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Maximum Velocity that play both.
Defense Reaction
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.776315789
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.742.743718593
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Put in Context
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Put in Context that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Pinion Sentry
Avg. played: Β
2.832.833333333
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Pinion Sentry that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Firewall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.695014663
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Firewall (Red) that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Steel Street Enforcement
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Steel Street Enforcement that play both.
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Cognition Field (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Cognition Field (Red) that play both.
Instant
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.669064748
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.688311688
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Calming Breeze that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Remembrance that play both.
Lubricate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Lubricate that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Fabricate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Fabricate that play both.
Resource
Master Cog
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Master Cog that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Medkit and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.