Precision Press (Red)
Warrior Action
Your next sword or dagger attack this turn has go again and piercing 3. (If it's defended by an equipment, it has +3{p}.)
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
0.8170.8166348942
Average Defense Value: Β
2.782.782446000
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dorinthea that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Kassai, Cintari Sellsword that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy that play both.
Mentor
Minerva Themis
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Minerva Themis that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Crown of Providence
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironsong Versus
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gallantry Gold
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Golden Gait
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Golden Gait that play both.
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Golden Galea
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Golden Galea that play both.
Golden Gauntlets
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Golden Gauntlets that play both.
Golden Heart Plate
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Golden Heart Plate that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Prized Galea
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Crown of Dominion
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Weapon
Dawnblade
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dawnblade that play both.
Cintari Saber
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hot Streak
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Quicksilver Dagger
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Quicksilver Dagger that play both.
Dawnblade, Resplendent
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dawnblade, Resplendent that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
2.692.690265487
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.540909091
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
2.492.493610224
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.485294118
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β
2.612.610337972
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.540816327
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.527964206
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.602.604938272
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.462.457671958
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.471052632
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.562.563253012
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.512328767
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
2.282.281094527
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.672.673684211
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.356783920
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.572.567901235
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Flurry Stance that play both.
Precision Press (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.505376344
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Precision Press (Yellow) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.384105960
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Slice and Dice (Blue) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β
2.512.506666667
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Raise an Army that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.490445860
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.530303030
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.407692308
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Push Forward (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Push Forward (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Driving Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.472868217
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Driving Blade (Blue) that play both.
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Power Stance that play both.
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
Dauntless (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dauntless (Red) that play both.
Dusk Path Pilgrimage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dusk Path Pilgrimage that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.412.412500000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Overcrowded that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
2.582.582329317
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Beat of the Ironsong
Avg. played: Β
2.452.454545455
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Beat of the Ironsong that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
2.682.679824561
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.622.622080679
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.762.755102041
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.802.795454545
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.489719626
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.561.559036145
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Rout that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played: Β
2.452.445812808
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Run Through that play both.
Blood Follows Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blood Follows Blade that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.402.395886889
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.280373832
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.446327684
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.497435897
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
2.642.637795276
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.526666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Perforate that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.510135135
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.377593361
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.503546099
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.561752988
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played: Β
2.602.603053435
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.517374517
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.421.424581006
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Overpower (Red) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.465517241
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Out for Blood (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Out for Blood (Blue) that play both.
Diced (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Diced (Red) that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.546961326
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.490347490
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.522.524193548
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Smoke Out that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
2.532.530612245
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Ironsong Pride
Avg. played: Β
2.172.170370370
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ironsong Pride that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Authority of Ataya that play both.