banner
Precision Press (Red)
908 decks (0.1664%)
Price History
Precision Press (Red)
Warrior Action
Your next sword or dagger attack this turn has go again and piercing 3. (If it's defended by an equipment, it has +3{p}.) Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
0.8140.8140972407
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.782.781508920
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
New
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dorinthea that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Kassai, Cintari Sellsword that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy that play both.
Kassai
Kassai
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Mentor
Minerva Themis
Minerva Themis
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Minerva Themis that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
Hood of Red Sand
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
New
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
New
Starting Point
Starting Point
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Starting Point that play both.
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Weapon
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dawnblade that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
Jubeel, Spellbane
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Quicksilver Dagger
Quicksilver Dagger
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Quicksilver Dagger that play both.
Dawnblade, Resplendent
Dawnblade, Resplendent
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dawnblade, Resplendent that play both.
New
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.596491228
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.517706577
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.476683938
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
New
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
New
Flurry Stance
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857142857
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Flurry Stance that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454545455
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.585421412
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.503401361
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.344902386
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.434523810
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.457227139
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.489425982
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.525000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.267955801
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.583941606
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.534246575
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.634146341
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
New
Cut Deep (Red)
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
New
Power Stance
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Power Stance that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.529411765
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Slice and Dice (Blue)
Slice and Dice (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.363636364
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Slice and Dice (Blue) that play both.
Raise an Army
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.507692308
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Raise an Army that play both.
Precision Press (Yellow)
Precision Press (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.478527607
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Precision Press (Yellow) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.623076923
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.482142857
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Push Forward (Red)
Push Forward (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Push Forward (Red) that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.475177305
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.403361345
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Driving Blade (Blue)
Driving Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.443478261
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Driving Blade (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
New
Knife through Butter (Red)
Knife through Butter (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Knife through Butter (Red) that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
New
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hunt a Killer (Red) that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
New
Agility Stance
Agility Stance
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Agility Stance that play both.
New
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
New
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.397350993
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
New
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and For the Dracai that play both.
New
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and March of Loyalty that play both.
New
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
New
Tip-Off (Red)
Tip-Off (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Tip-Off (Red) that play both.
New
Tip-Off (Yellow)
Tip-Off (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Tip-Off (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.546969697
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
New
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.875000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.649717514
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.470103093
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
New
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833333333
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Perforate that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.594272076
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.541.539845758
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Rout that play both.
Run Through
Run Through
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.429333333
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Run Through that play both.
New
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.425149701
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.464788732
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.279596977
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.593959732
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642857143
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
New
Diced (Red)
Diced (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Diced (Red) that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.352941176
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.507246377
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.483394834
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.509433962
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.557446809
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.502040816
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.566037736
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
New
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
New
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Endear Devotion that play both.
New
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
New
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Hunt's End that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
New
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Incision (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.761.755760369
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Overpower (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.446808511
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Out for Blood (Blue)
Out for Blood (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.414414414
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Out for Blood (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
New
Exposed
Exposed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Exposed that play both.
New
Diced (Yellow)
Diced (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Diced (Yellow) that play both.
New
Dynastic Dedication
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
New
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Imperial Intent that play both.
New
Scalding Iron
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Scalding Iron that play both.
New
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Stabbing Pain that play both.
New
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Blistering Blade that play both.
New
Diced (Blue)
Diced (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Diced (Blue) that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
New
To the Point (Red)
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and To the Point (Red) that play both.
New
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
New
Take a Stab (Red)
Take a Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Take a Stab (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ironsong Response (Yellow) that play both.
Puncture (Blue)
Puncture (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Puncture (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.507936508
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.560000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.463829787
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.490909091
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
New
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
New
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Smoke Out that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.467532468
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
New
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
New
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Pledge Fealty that play both.
New
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Ironsong Pride
Ironsong Pride
Avg. played: Β 
2.122.118644068
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Ironsong Pride that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
New
Bubble to the Surface
Bubble to the Surface
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Precision Press (Red) and Bubble to the Surface that play both.