Sift (Yellow)
Generic Action
Put up to 3 cards from your hand on the bottom of your deck, then draw that many cards.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.583.579774932
Average Defense Value: Β
2.682.676068781
Hero
Valda Brightaxe
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Kassai
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Kassai that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Viserai, Rune Blood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Equipment
Earthlore Bounty
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Nullrune Boots
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crater Fist
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Civic Steps
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Civic Steps that play both.
Mage Master Boots
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Hood
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Crown of Dominion
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Sealace Sarong
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Civic Peak
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Civic Peak that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Balance of Justice
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Ironrot Legs
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Lightning Greaves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Bastion of Duty
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Time Skippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Time Skippers that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Glidewell Fins
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Glidewell Fins that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
Anothos
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Anothos that play both.
Redspine Manta
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Redspine Manta that play both.
Hot Streak
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Hot Streak that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
High Riser
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and High Riser that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Kraken's Aethervein
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Kraken's Aethervein that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.466942149
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.262.264384559
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Sift (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.280731847
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sift (Red) that play both.
Tectonic Rift
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Tectonic Rift that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.472.473962264
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Potion of Luck
Avg. played: Β
2.162.160244648
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Potion of Luck that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.602.602857143
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Cash In that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Call in the Big Guns (Red) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
2.552.545454545
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Big Game Trophy Shot
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Big Game Trophy Shot that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.082.081008101
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Energy Potion that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714285714
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Unsheathed that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Cash Out
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Cash Out that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Loan Shark that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Call in the Big Guns (Yellow) that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blessing of Deliverance (Blue) that play both.
Talisman of Tithes
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Talisman of Tithes that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.595375723
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.412.409836066
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Truce that play both.
Talisman of Balance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Talisman of Balance that play both.
Pry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Pry (Blue) that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Show Time! that play both.
Gold the Tip
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Gold the Tip that play both.
Scrub the Deck
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Scrub the Deck that play both.
Drop the Anchor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Drop the Anchor that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Buckle that play both.
Seismic Stir (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Seismic Stir (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β
2.522.522580645
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Raise an Army that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Tempest Aurora (Blue) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Trot Along that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Talisman of Cremation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Talisman of Cremation that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Call in the Big Guns (Blue) that play both.
Fire in the Hole
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Fire in the Hole that play both.
Attack Action
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.242.244936709
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.252.254847645
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.232.225806452
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.252.246966453
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.262.263826607
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.192.190978887
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.881.879968203
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Pulverize that play both.
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727272727
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727272727
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
1.751.749700599
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.266745006
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.232.226760563
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.252.254263566
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Mangle that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.281519862
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.342.343692870
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Swift Shot that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sea Legs that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Barbed Barrage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Barbed Barrage that play both.
HMS Barracuda
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and HMS Barracuda that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Star Struck that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Bet Big that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Dry Powder Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Dry Powder Shot that play both.
HMS Marlin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and HMS Marlin that play both.
HMS Kraken
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and HMS Kraken that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.212.212682927
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.325454545
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.481764207
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.412.413043478
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.632.628318584
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Block
Instant
Brainstorm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Brainstorm that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.472689076
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Remembrance that play both.
banned - Blitz
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.