Sift (Yellow)
Generic Action
Put up to 3 cards from your hand on the bottom of your deck, then draw that many cards.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.633.632302817
Average Defense Value: Β
2.662.664186183
Hero
Valda Brightaxe
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
New
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Terra
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Terra that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Kassai
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Kassai that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Viserai, Rune Blood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Equipment
Earthlore Bounty
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Crater Fist
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Boots
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Mage Master Boots
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Civic Steps
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Civic Steps that play both.
Arcane Lantern
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Dominion
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Crown of Providence
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Balance of Justice
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Storm Striders
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Civic Peak
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Civic Peak that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Ironrot Legs
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Bastion of Duty
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Time Skippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Time Skippers that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Ironsong Versus
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Nullrune Robe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Aurum Aegis
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Anothos that play both.
Hot Streak
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Hot Streak that play both.
High Riser
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and High Riser that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Kraken's Aethervein
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Kraken's Aethervein that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.473192327
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.272.265060241
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Sift (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.267247153
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sift (Red) that play both.
Tectonic Rift
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Tectonic Rift that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.602.600764088
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Cash In that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.492.489093960
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Potion of Luck
Avg. played: Β
2.172.168741355
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Potion of Luck that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.072.069620253
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Energy Potion that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Cash Out
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Cash Out that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.593103448
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Talisman of Tithes
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Talisman of Tithes that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
Talisman of Balance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Talisman of Balance that play both.
Pry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Pry (Blue) that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blessing of Deliverance (Blue) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β
2.452.446428571
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Raise an Army that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Show Time! that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Buckle that play both.
Flourish
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Flourish that play both.
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Tempest Aurora (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Seismic Stir (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Seismic Stir (Red) that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Talisman of Cremation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Talisman of Cremation that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Looming Doom that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Amulet of Intervention
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Amulet of Intervention that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Mind Warp that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Attack Action
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.252.246200608
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.252.254545455
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.232.228915663
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.262.259816207
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.278169014
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.192.194285714
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.891.890140845
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Pulverize that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
1.741.742489270
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.284106892
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.236797274
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.272.268077601
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Mangle that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.298387097
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.322.315673289
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Bet Big that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Star Struck that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.192.194444444
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.322.318181818
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
2.612.609523810
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.491118077
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.642.639658849
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Saving Grace that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Block
Canopy Shelter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Canopy Shelter that play both.
Instant
Brainstorm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Brainstorm that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Pass Over that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Kindle that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.491803279
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.553459119
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Remembrance that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Resource
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Yellow) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.