Sift (Red)
Generic Action
Put up to 4 cards from your hand on the bottom of your deck, then draw that many cards.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.693.694060437
Average Defense Value: Β
2.652.650790212
Hero
Valda Brightaxe
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Oscilio
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Oscilio that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Equipment
Earthlore Bounty
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Crater Fist
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Mage Master Boots
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Civic Steps
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Arcane Lantern
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Lightning Greaves
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Crown of Dominion
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Crown of Providence
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Storm Striders
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Civic Peak
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Peak that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Ironrot Legs
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Bastion of Duty
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Time Skippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Hold Focus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hold Focus that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Well Grounded
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Anothos
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Anothos that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Kraken's Aethervein
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kraken's Aethervein that play both.
High Riser
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and High Riser that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Hot Streak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Waning Moon
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.469753086
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.437869822
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.252.254358974
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Tectonic Rift
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tectonic Rift that play both.
Potion of Luck
Avg. played: Β
2.222.219714071
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Potion of Luck that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.622.619217082
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash In that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.492.485561497
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.112.112476371
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.762.757281553
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Cash Out
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash Out that play both.
Talisman of Tithes
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Tithes that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Talisman of Balance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Balance that play both.
Pry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pry (Blue) that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Blue) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.592.585889571
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.559523810
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tempest Aurora (Blue) that play both.
Talisman of Cremation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Cremation that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mind Warp that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Truce that play both.
Amulet of Intervention
Avg. played: Β
2.462.459259259
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Intervention that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.512.509225092
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Seismic Stir (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Seismic Stir (Red) that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aether Arc that play both.
Attack Action
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.222.224738676
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.232.234579439
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.222.216666667
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.235237173
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.240963855
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.192.191196699
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.921.918015102
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.242.235621521
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
1.671.674496644
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.282809612
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.262.262845850
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
1.721.718604651
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.302.304038005
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.304568528
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blast to Oblivion (Blue) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blast to Oblivion (Yellow) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.612.614525140
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.426533524
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.462.457534247
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β
2.842.842105263
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Brainstorm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Brainstorm that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β
2.712.708333333
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.622.619047619
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Stir the Pot that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kindle that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
High Voltage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and High Voltage that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Resource
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.
Will of Arcana
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Will of Arcana that play both.