Sift (Red)
Generic Action
Put up to 4 cards from your hand on the bottom of your deck, then draw that many cards.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.633.633112705
Average Defense Value: Β
2.662.657706448
Hero
Valda Brightaxe
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Valda, Seismic Impact
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Equipment
Earthlore Bounty
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Crater Fist
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mage Master Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Civic Steps
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Arcane Lantern
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Crown of Providence
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Testament of Valahai
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Testament of Valahai that play both.
Crown of Dominion
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Lightning Greaves
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Civic Peak
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Peak that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Ironrot Legs
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Bastion of Duty
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Base of the Mountain
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Time Skippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Redspine Manta
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Redspine Manta that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Kraken's Aethervein
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kraken's Aethervein that play both.
High Riser
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and High Riser that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Waning Moon
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
Hot Streak
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.467432950
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.441467676
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.262.258823529
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Promising Terrain that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
2.782.777777778
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Tectonic Rift
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tectonic Rift that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Potion of Luck
Avg. played: Β
2.212.213397790
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Potion of Luck that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.482.481409002
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.622.620283019
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.122.123236124
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.752.753222836
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Cash Out
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash Out that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Leave a Dent that play both.
Draw a Crowd
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Draw a Crowd that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Call in the Big Guns (Red) that play both.
Talisman of Tithes
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Tithes that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
Talisman of Balance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Balance that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Blue) that play both.
Pry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pry (Blue) that play both.
Fire in the Hole
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fire in the Hole that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β
2.602.595930233
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.462.460000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Truce that play both.
Seismic Stir (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Seismic Stir (Red) that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tempest Aurora (Blue) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Talisman of Cremation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Cremation that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mind Warp that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.502.503355705
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Amulet of Intervention
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Intervention that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Drop the Anchor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Drop the Anchor that play both.
Monkey Powder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Monkey Powder that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.232.231651376
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β
2.822.818181818
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.242.242549669
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.222.218038529
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.236909871
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.241806909
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β
1.921.920076118
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.192.193111931
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β
1.691.692421991
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.269230769
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
2.232.230118443
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.252.251689189
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.332.331905782
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.304932735
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Swift Shot that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β
2.622.619680851
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Disenchantment of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disenchantment of the Old Ones that play both.
Smelting of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Smelting of the Old Ones that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
Dry Powder Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Dry Powder Shot that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.445368171
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Solid Ground
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Solid Ground that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.582.583333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.492.489510490
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Block
Return Fire
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Return Fire that play both.
Instant
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Brainstorm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Brainstorm that play both.
Seismic Eruption
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Seismic Eruption that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kindle that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Resource
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.