banner
Sift (Red)
2657 decks (0.3794%)
Price History
Sift (Red)
Generic Action
Put up to 4 cards from your hand on the bottom of your deck, then draw that many cards. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.643.637488351
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.662.657594092
Hero
Valda Brightaxe
Valda Brightaxe
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo
Bravo
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Equipment
Earthlore Bounty
Earthlore Bounty
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
New
Testament of Valahai
Testament of Valahai
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Testament of Valahai that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
Hope Merchant's Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Lightning Greaves
Lightning Greaves
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
Tremorshield Sabatons
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Civic Peak
Civic Peak
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Peak that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
Alluvion Constellas
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
Ironrot Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Bastion of Duty
Bastion of Duty
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Redspine Manta
Redspine Manta
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Redspine Manta that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Kraken's Aethervein
Kraken's Aethervein
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kraken's Aethervein that play both.
High Riser
High Riser
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and High Riser that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
Crucible of Aetherweave
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Sift (Blue)
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.466264399
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.440233236
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.257479601
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Promising Terrain
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Promising Terrain that play both.
Tectonic Rift
Tectonic Rift
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tectonic Rift that play both.
Potion of Luck
Potion of Luck
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.213692946
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Potion of Luck that play both.
Surface Shaking
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733333333
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.480901077
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.620283019
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
2.122.123236124
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.752767528
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Draw a Crowd
Draw a Crowd
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Draw a Crowd that play both.
Blazing Aether
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Cash Out
Cash Out
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash Out that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Fire in the Hole
Fire in the Hole
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fire in the Hole that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Call in the Big Guns (Red) that play both.
Talisman of Tithes
Talisman of Tithes
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Tithes that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
Leave a Dent
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Leave a Dent that play both.
Talisman of Balance
Talisman of Balance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Balance that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Blue) that play both.
Pry (Blue)
Pry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pry (Blue) that play both.
Show Time!
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.595930233
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Truce
Truce
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.460000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Truce that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Seismic Stir (Red)
Seismic Stir (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Seismic Stir (Red) that play both.
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tempest Aurora (Blue) that play both.
Portside Exchange
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Talisman of Cremation
Talisman of Cremation
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Cremation that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Mind Warp
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mind Warp that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.501683502
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Amulet of Intervention
Amulet of Intervention
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Intervention that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.230474732
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.241293532
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.222.218038529
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.236457438
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.240461402
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
New
Put 'Em In Their Place
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Pulverize
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β 
1.921.919124643
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.192.192874693
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β 
1.691.692421991
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.269230769
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.228813559
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.251689189
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Mangle
Mangle
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.329032258
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.304932735
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Swift Shot
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Swift Shot that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
New
Disenchantment of the Old Ones
Disenchantment of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disenchantment of the Old Ones that play both.
Headbutt
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619680851
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Dry Powder Shot
Dry Powder Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Dry Powder Shot that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.205983890
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.357142857
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.444708680
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
New
Solid Ground
Solid Ground
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Solid Ground that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.489510490
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Brainstorm
Brainstorm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Brainstorm that play both.
New
Seismic Eruption
Seismic Eruption
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Seismic Eruption that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Channel Lightning Valley
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Kindle
Kindle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kindle that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Resource
Grandeur of Valahai
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.