banner
Sift (Red)
2620 decks (0.3898%)
Price History
Sift (Red)
Generic Action
Put up to 4 cards from your hand on the bottom of your deck, then draw that many cards. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.643.643878318
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.662.658044795
Hero
Jarl VetreiΓ°i
Jarl VetreiΓ°i
400% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Jarl VetreiΓ°i that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
Valda, Seismic Impact
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Valda Brightaxe
Valda Brightaxe
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Scurv, Stowaway
Scurv, Stowaway
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Marlynn
Marlynn
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Marlynn that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo
Bravo
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
325% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
Ollin Ice Cap
125% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
Root-Bound Trunks
125% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
Earthlore Bounty
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Heavy Industry Gear Shift
Heavy Industry Gear Shift
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Heavy Industry Gear Shift that play both.
Heavy Industry Surveillance
Heavy Industry Surveillance
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Heavy Industry Surveillance that play both.
Tectonic Crust
Tectonic Crust
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tectonic Crust that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
Hope Merchant's Hood
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Lightning Greaves
Lightning Greaves
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Tremorshield Sabatons
Tremorshield Sabatons
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tremorshield Sabatons that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Civic Peak
Civic Peak
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Peak that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
Alluvion Constellas
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
Ironrot Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Bastion of Duty
Bastion of Duty
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
Gold-Baited Hook
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Sealace Sarong
Sealace Sarong
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Blue Sea Tricorn
Blue Sea Tricorn
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blue Sea Tricorn that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Quick Clicks
Quick Clicks
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Quick Clicks that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
Swiftstrike Bracers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
Flash of Brilliance
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
Summit, the Unforgiving
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Redspine Manta
Redspine Manta
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Redspine Manta that play both.
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Kraken's Aethervein
Kraken's Aethervein
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kraken's Aethervein that play both.
High Riser
High Riser
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and High Riser that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
Crucible of Aetherweave
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
325% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625000000
150% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Frozen to Death that play both.
Channel Mount Isen
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Cerebellum Processor
Cerebellum Processor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cerebellum Processor that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.464640884
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.436063642
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.254562044
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Tectonic Rift
Tectonic Rift
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tectonic Rift that play both.
Potion of Luck
Potion of Luck
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.214335421
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Potion of Luck that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.479249012
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.620118343
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
2.122.120413923
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.753246753
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Surface Shaking
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Blazing Aether
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Cash Out
Cash Out
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash Out that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Talisman of Tithes
Talisman of Tithes
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Tithes that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
Talisman of Balance
Talisman of Balance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Balance that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Blue) that play both.
Pry (Blue)
Pry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pry (Blue) that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Truce
Truce
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.408163265
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Truce that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Show Time!
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.591836735
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Call in the Big Guns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Call in the Big Guns (Red) that play both.
Call in the Big Guns (Yellow)
Call in the Big Guns (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Call in the Big Guns (Yellow) that play both.
Fire in the Hole
Fire in the Hole
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fire in the Hole that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Line
Line
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Line that play both.
Loan Shark
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Loan Shark that play both.
Portside Exchange
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Mutiny on the Battalion Barque
Mutiny on the Battalion Barque
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mutiny on the Battalion Barque that play both.
Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign
Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign that play both.
Mutiny on the Swiftwater
Mutiny on the Swiftwater
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mutiny on the Swiftwater that play both.
Scrub the Deck
Scrub the Deck
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Scrub the Deck that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Burn Bare
Burn Bare
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Burn Bare that play both.
Monkey Powder
Monkey Powder
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Monkey Powder that play both.
Seismic Stir (Red)
Seismic Stir (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Seismic Stir (Red) that play both.
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tempest Aurora (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Talisman of Cremation
Talisman of Cremation
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Cremation that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Mind Warp
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mind Warp that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Amulet of Intervention
Amulet of Intervention
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Intervention that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.222.223857475
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.235146444
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.212201592
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.229565217
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.234767025
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β 
1.921.916506718
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.192.185093168
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Fast and Furious
Fast and Furious
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fast and Furious that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β 
1.691.691044776
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.225641026
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.268608414
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.245733788
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Swift Shot
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Swift Shot that play both.
Mangle
Mangle
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.329004329
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.617647059
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Blue Fin Harpoon
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
King Kraken Harpoon
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
King Shark Harpoon
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
Gold Hunter Lightsail
Gold Hunter Lightsail
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gold Hunter Lightsail that play both.
Gold Hunter Longboat
Gold Hunter Longboat
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gold Hunter Longboat that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Strike Gold (Yellow)
Strike Gold (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Strike Gold (Yellow) that play both.
Thiev'n Varmints
Thiev'n Varmints
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thiev'n Varmints that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.202.198124267
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.355855856
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437876960
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.548387097
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.483568075
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
On the Horizon (Red)
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Return Fire
Return Fire
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Return Fire that play both.
Instant
Brainstorm
Brainstorm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Brainstorm that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
banned - Blitz
Channel Lightning Valley
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Kindle
Kindle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kindle that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Resource
Grandeur of Valahai
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.