banner
Sift (Red)
1794 decks (0.6050%)
Price History
Sift (Red)
Generic Action
Put up to 4 cards from your hand on the bottom of your deck, then draw that many cards. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.803.798420021
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.652.650678201
Hero
Valda Brightaxe
Valda Brightaxe
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Kassai
Kassai
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Bravo
Bravo
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bravo that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Equipment
Earthlore Bounty
Earthlore Bounty
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
Hope Merchant's Hood
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Civic Peak
Civic Peak
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Peak that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
Alluvion Constellas
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
Ironrot Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Bastion of Duty
Bastion of Duty
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
Hood of Red Sand
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Aurum Aegis
Aurum Aegis
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Robe of Rapture
Robe of Rapture
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Robe of Rapture that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Anothos that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Kraken's Aethervein
Kraken's Aethervein
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kraken's Aethervein that play both.
High Riser
High Riser
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and High Riser that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
Crucible of Aetherweave
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Sift (Blue)
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.465838509
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.435470441
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.250000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Tectonic Rift
Tectonic Rift
Avg. played: Β 
1.841.840579710
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tectonic Rift that play both.
Potion of Luck
Potion of Luck
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.211659193
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Potion of Luck that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.621023513
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash In that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.501285347
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733031674
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Blazing Aether
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Cash Out
Cash Out
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash Out that play both.
Talisman of Tithes
Talisman of Tithes
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Tithes that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
Talisman of Balance
Talisman of Balance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Balance that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.469387755
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Pry (Blue)
Pry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pry (Blue) that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.421052632
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Raise an Army that play both.
Starting Stake
Starting Stake
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Starting Stake that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Blue) that play both.
Show Time!
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.584775087
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tempest Aurora (Blue) that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Talisman of Cremation
Talisman of Cremation
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Cremation that play both.
Amulet of Intervention
Amulet of Intervention
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.456349206
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Intervention that play both.
Mind Warp
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mind Warp that play both.
Aether Arc
Aether Arc
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aether Arc that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.521186441
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Earthlore Empowerment (Red) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Chain Lightning
Chain Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chain Lightning that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Seismic Stir (Red)
Seismic Stir (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Seismic Stir (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Embolden (Blue)
Embolden (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Embolden (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.222.224973089
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.230310263
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.213675214
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.233292831
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.236162362
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β 
1.951.945312500
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.172.173758865
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
2.102.097055616
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.249466951
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β 
1.651.651804671
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.309302326
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.274509804
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Mangle
Mangle
Avg. played: Β 
1.701.700000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.328445748
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.601286174
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.594594595
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.182.184764992
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.349030471
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.405566600
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400735294
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Brainstorm
Brainstorm
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.807785888
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Brainstorm that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Grandeur of Valahai
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.