Sloggism (Red)
Generic Action
The next attack action card with cost [2 Resource] or greater you play this turn gains +6 [Power].
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.672.667958984
Average Defense Value: Β
2.562.555536924
Hero
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Viserai, Rune Blood
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Scurv, Stowaway
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
New
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Kayo, Underhanded Cheat that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Lyath Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Bloodied Oval
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Providence
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Face Purgatory
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Balance of Justice
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Nullrune Boots
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Craterhoof
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Base of the Mountain
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Nullrune Hood
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Blue Sea Tricorn
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Blue Sea Tricorn that play both.
Buccaneer's Bounty
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Peg Leg
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Peg Leg that play both.
Civic Steps
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mage Master Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ironrot Legs
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Gauntlet of Boulderhold
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Gauntlet of Boulderhold that play both.
Testament of Valahai
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Testament of Valahai that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Tectonic Plating
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Sealace Sarong
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Crater Fist
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Deep Blue
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Aether Ironweave
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Ironhide Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Weapon
banned - Classic Constructed
Scepter of Pain
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Reaping Blade
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Anothos
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Nebula Blade
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Action
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.863687151
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Looming Doom that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played: Β
2.452.451935081
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played: Β
2.792.785202864
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Runeblood Barrier
Avg. played: Β
2.262.263009845
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Runeblood Barrier that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.212.214285714
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Sloggism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.283609576
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sloggism (Blue) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.692307692
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played: Β
2.112.105150215
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
2.302.300000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.362.359338061
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.452.454545455
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Shifting Tides that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.132.127906977
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Promising Terrain that play both.
Overswing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Overswing (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.102.097402597
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Condemn to Slaughter (Blue) that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Big Game Trophy Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Big Game Trophy Shot that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Sigil of Deadwood
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sigil of Deadwood that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Sloggism (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sloggism (Yellow) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Loan Shark that play both.
Scrub the Deck
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Scrub the Deck that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Attack Action
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.736151603
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
2.282.276243094
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Ripple Away that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played: Β
2.482.482758621
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Money or Your Life? (Red) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.362.357142857
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.272.272727273
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sea Legs that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.300000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.572.569620253
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Regurgitating Slog (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Regurgitating Slog (Red) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Money or Your Life? (Yellow) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Battalion Barque (Yellow) that play both.
HMS Marlin
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and HMS Marlin that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
Little Big Foot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Little Big Foot (Red) that play both.
Little Big Foot (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Little Big Foot (Yellow) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Headbutt that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Enact Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Enact Vengeance that play both.
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Vengeance Never Rests
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Vengeance Never Rests that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
HMS Kraken
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and HMS Kraken that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.452631579
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Crash Down the Gates (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Crash Down the Gates (Red) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Saltwater Swell (Yellow) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.052.053910402
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.342.344017094
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.726633872
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.722.717391304
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.911.905686546
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.132.125661376
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.252.250000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.052.052910053
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Seismic Eruption
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Seismic Eruption that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Not So Fast
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Not So Fast that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Arknight Shard that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sloggism (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
