banner
Zap (Yellow)
118 decks (0.01909%)
Price History
Zap (Yellow)
Wizard Action
Deal 2 arcane damage to target hero.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
0.6680.6675026817
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.662.661045872
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Kano
Kano
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Kano that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Verdance
Verdance
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Verdance that play both.
Oscilio
Oscilio
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Oscilio that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Equipment
Hold Focus
Hold Focus
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Hold Focus that play both.
Robe of Rapture
Robe of Rapture
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Robe of Rapture that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Talismanic Lens
Talismanic Lens
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Talismanic Lens that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
Spellfire Cloak
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Ragamuffin's Hat
Ragamuffin's Hat
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Ragamuffin's Hat that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
Helm of Lignum Vitae
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
Seeker's Mitts
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Storm Striders that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
Ironrot Gauntlet
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
Alluvion Constellas
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Lightning Greaves
Lightning Greaves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
Ironhide Gauntlet
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Seeker's Leggings
Seeker's Leggings
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Seeker's Leggings that play both.
Ironhide Legs
Ironhide Legs
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Well Grounded that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
Flash of Brilliance
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Four Finger Gloves
Four Finger Gloves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Four Finger Gloves that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
Hope Merchant's Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ironrot Legs
Ironrot Legs
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Frontline Gauntlets
Frontline Gauntlets
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Frontline Gauntlets that play both.
Frontline Plating
Frontline Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Frontline Plating that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
Crucible of Aetherweave
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Waning Moon that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
Staff of Verdant Shoots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Surgent Aethertide
Surgent Aethertide
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Surgent Aethertide that play both.
Aether Conduit
Aether Conduit
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Conduit that play both.
Seerstone
Seerstone
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Seerstone that play both.
Action
Zap (Red)
Zap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.112.107843137
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Zap (Red) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.132.125000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Scalding Rain (Blue) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.102.098765432
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Voltic Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.052.045977011
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.142.141304348
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.092.091954023
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Zap (Blue)
Zap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.152.145833333
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Zap (Blue) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.172.166666667
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Blue)
Aether Flare (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.102.102564103
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Flare (Blue) that play both.
Reverberate (Blue)
Reverberate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.062.062500000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Reverberate (Blue) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Yellow)
Scalding Rain (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.901.902777778
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Scalding Rain (Yellow) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Yellow)
Voltic Bolt (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.971.971428571
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Voltic Bolt (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.951.946428571
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.314814815
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Timekeeper's Whim (Blue)
Timekeeper's Whim (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Timekeeper's Whim (Blue) that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.122.122448980
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Red)
Pop the Bubble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Pop the Bubble (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.251.250000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Yellow)
Arcane Twining (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.401.400000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Arcane Twining (Yellow) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.601.600000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.750000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Timekeeper's Whim (Red)
Timekeeper's Whim (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Timekeeper's Whim (Red) that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.432432432
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Pry (Blue)
Pry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.225806452
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Pry (Blue) that play both.
Aether Dart (Yellow)
Aether Dart (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.112.105263158
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Dart (Yellow) that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.971.966666667
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Red)
Snapback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.142.136363636
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Snapback (Red) that play both.
Aether Arc
Aether Arc
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Arc that play both.
Potion of DΓ©jΓ  Vu
Potion of DΓ©jΓ  Vu
Avg. played: Β 
1.261.259259259
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Potion of DΓ©jΓ  Vu that play both.
Aether Flare (Yellow)
Aether Flare (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.801.804347826
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Flare (Yellow) that play both.
Sap (Blue)
Sap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.560000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Sap (Blue) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Blue)
Snapback (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.296296296
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Snapback (Blue) that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714285714
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Prognosticate (Blue)
Prognosticate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.206896552
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Prognosticate (Blue) that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.331.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Harvest Season (Yellow)
Harvest Season (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Harvest Season (Yellow) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.331.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Perennial Aetherbloom (Yellow)
Perennial Aetherbloom (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Perennial Aetherbloom (Yellow) that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Blue)
Pop the Bubble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.331.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Pop the Bubble (Blue) that play both.
Strong Yield (Red)
Strong Yield (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Strong Yield (Red) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Yellow)
Open the Flood Gates (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.750000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Open the Flood Gates (Yellow) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Yellow)
Overflow the Aetherwell (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Overflow the Aetherwell (Yellow) that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Yellow)
Pop the Bubble (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Pop the Bubble (Yellow) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Yellow)
Etchings of Arcana (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.331.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Etchings of Arcana (Yellow) that play both.
Perennial Aetherbloom (Red)
Perennial Aetherbloom (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Perennial Aetherbloom (Red) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Yellow)
Trailblazing Aether (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.331.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Trailblazing Aether (Yellow) that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
1.821.818181818
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Energy Potion that play both.
Prognosticate (Yellow)
Prognosticate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.102.095238095
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Prognosticate (Yellow) that play both.
Blazing Aether
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.228571429
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Reverberate (Yellow)
Reverberate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Reverberate (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Yellow)
Snapback (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Snapback (Yellow) that play both.
Sap (Yellow)
Sap (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642857143
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Sap (Yellow) that play both.
Contest the Mindfield
Contest the Mindfield
Avg. played: Β 
1.601.600000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Contest the Mindfield that play both.
Sap (Red)
Sap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.533333333
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Sap (Red) that play both.
Index (Blue)
Index (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Index (Blue) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Blue)
Aether Spindle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Spindle (Blue) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.611111111
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Cindering Foresight (Red) that play both.
Chain Lightning
Chain Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Chain Lightning that play both.
Sonic Boom
Sonic Boom
Avg. played: Β 
2.072.066666667
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Sonic Boom that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.388888889
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.588235294
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Rousing Aether (Blue)
Rousing Aether (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Rousing Aether (Blue) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.062.062500000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Quickening (Blue) that play both.
Harvest Season (Blue)
Harvest Season (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Harvest Season (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Yellow)
Photon Splicing (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Photon Splicing (Yellow) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Blue)
Exploding Aether (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Exploding Aether (Blue) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Yellow)
Exploding Aether (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Exploding Aether (Yellow) that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Chorus of the Amphitheater (Red)
Chorus of the Amphitheater (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Chorus of the Amphitheater (Red) that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Yellow)
Glyph Overlay (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Glyph Overlay (Yellow) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Trailblazing Aether (Blue) that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Red)
Foreboding Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Foreboding Bolt (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Yellow)
Aether Quickening (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Quickening (Yellow) that play both.
Index (Red)
Index (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.401.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Index (Red) that play both.
Index (Yellow)
Index (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.401.400000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Index (Yellow) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Red)
Whisper of the Oracle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.601.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Whisper of the Oracle (Red) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Blue)
Cindering Foresight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Cindering Foresight (Blue) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Yellow)
Cindering Foresight (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.531.533333333
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Cindering Foresight (Yellow) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Aether Wildfire
Aether Wildfire
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Wildfire that play both.
Forked Lightning
Forked Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Forked Lightning that play both.
Mind Warp
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Mind Warp that play both.
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Tempest Aurora (Blue) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Aether (Red)
Blessing of Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Blessing of Aether (Red) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Yellow)
Aether Spindle (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.461538462
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Aether Spindle (Yellow) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Yellow)
Emeritus Scolding (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Emeritus Scolding (Yellow) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Yellow)
Foreboding Bolt (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Foreboding Bolt (Yellow) that play both.
Rousing Aether (Red)
Rousing Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Rousing Aether (Red) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Blue)
Foreboding Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Foreboding Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Stir the Aetherwinds (Red)
Stir the Aetherwinds (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Stir the Aetherwinds (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Strength of Four Seasons (Red)
Strength of Four Seasons (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Strength of Four Seasons (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Yellow)
Cadaverous Tilling (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Cadaverous Tilling (Yellow) that play both.
Earth Form (Red)
Earth Form (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Earth Form (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Current Funnel that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Fry (Blue)
Fry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Fry (Blue) that play both.
Fry (Yellow)
Fry (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Fry (Yellow) that play both.
Lightning Form (Blue)
Lightning Form (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Lightning Form (Blue) that play both.
Second Strike (Blue)
Second Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Second Strike (Blue) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Trip the Light Fantastic (Red)
Trip the Light Fantastic (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Trip the Light Fantastic (Red) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Strength of Four Seasons (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Strength of Four Seasons (Blue) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Strength of Four Seasons (Yellow)
Strength of Four Seasons (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Strength of Four Seasons (Yellow) that play both.
Skyzyk
Skyzyk
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Skyzyk that play both.
Defense Reaction
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Blue)
Rootbound Carapace (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Rootbound Carapace (Blue) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Kindle
Kindle
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Kindle that play both.
Fertile Ground (Blue)
Fertile Ground (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Fertile Ground (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Sigil of Sanctuary
Sigil of Sanctuary
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Sigil of Sanctuary that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Yellow)
Arcane Polarity (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Arcane Polarity (Yellow) that play both.
Save the Thought (Blue)
Save the Thought (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Save the Thought (Blue) that play both.
Save the Thought (Red)
Save the Thought (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Save the Thought (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Forethought
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
Resource
Will of Arcana
Will of Arcana
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Yellow) and Will of Arcana that play both.