banner
Zap (Red)
1903 decks (0.3156%)
Price History
Zap (Red)
Wizard Action
Deal 3 arcane damage to target hero.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.731.733007766
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.522.518450585
Hero
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Kano
Kano
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Kano that play both.
Oscilio
Oscilio
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Oscilio that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Verdance
Verdance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Verdance that play both.
Equipment
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Hold Focus
Hold Focus
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Hold Focus that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
Spellfire Cloak
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Ragamuffin's Hat
Ragamuffin's Hat
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ragamuffin's Hat that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
Alluvion Constellas
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Talismanic Lens
Talismanic Lens
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Talismanic Lens that play both.
Robe of Rapture
Robe of Rapture
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Robe of Rapture that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Spell Fray Tiara
Spell Fray Tiara
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Spell Fray Tiara that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
Ironrot Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Lightning Greaves
Lightning Greaves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Bastion of Unity
Bastion of Unity
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Bastion of Unity that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
Stonewall Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
Seeker's Mitts
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
Ironhide Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Deep Blue
Deep Blue
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
Flash of Brilliance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
Helm of Lignum Vitae
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
Spell Fray Gloves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Weapon
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
Crucible of Aetherweave
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
Jubeel, Spellbane
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
New
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
Staff of Verdant Shoots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Action
Aether Dart (Red)
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.112.107449857
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.112.110316650
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
Sap (Red)
Sap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sap (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.320000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Swell Tidings that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.283307810
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.366666667
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Perennial Aetherbloom (Red)
Perennial Aetherbloom (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.297872340
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Perennial Aetherbloom (Red) that play both.
New
Ring of Roses
Ring of Roses
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ring of Roses that play both.
Zap (Blue)
Zap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.318918919
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Zap (Blue) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.377777778
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.317073171
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.270270270
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.239234450
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Voltic Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Reverberate (Blue)
Reverberate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.257009346
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Reverberate (Blue) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.286363636
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Scalding Rain (Blue) that play both.
Aether Flare (Blue)
Aether Flare (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.358241758
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Flare (Blue) that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.349282297
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Red)
Snapback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.371084337
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Snapback (Red) that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.444444444
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.354838710
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Prognosticate (Blue)
Prognosticate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.322884013
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Prognosticate (Blue) that play both.
New
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.703703704
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454314721
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.408333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Blazing Aether
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.617210682
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Blazing Aether that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Blue)
Snapback (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Snapback (Blue) that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Blessing of Aether (Red)
Blessing of Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Blessing of Aether (Red) that play both.
Aether Arc
Aether Arc
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Arc that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.603833866
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.553254438
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Aether Wildfire
Aether Wildfire
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Wildfire that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554517134
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Sap (Blue)
Sap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.403292181
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sap (Blue) that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Forked Lightning
Forked Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Forked Lightning that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.433198381
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Red)
Foreboding Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Foreboding Bolt (Red) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Blue)
Foreboding Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Foreboding Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Sonic Boom
Sonic Boom
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.475095785
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sonic Boom that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Red)
Pop the Bubble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.550000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Pop the Bubble (Red) that play both.
Perennial Aetherbloom (Blue)
Perennial Aetherbloom (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Perennial Aetherbloom (Blue) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.476190476
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue) that play both.
Timekeeper's Whim (Blue)
Timekeeper's Whim (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Timekeeper's Whim (Blue) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Cindering Foresight (Red) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Trailblazing Aether (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Yellow)
Snapback (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Snapback (Yellow) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Chain Lightning
Chain Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Chain Lightning that play both.
Captain's Call (Red)
Captain's Call (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Captain's Call (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
New
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
New
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and For the Dracai that play both.
New
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and March of Loyalty that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Wounding Blow (Red)
Wounding Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Wounding Blow (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
New
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Plow Under
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Fry (Red)
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
New
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
New
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Imperial Intent that play both.
New
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Blistering Blade that play both.
New
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
New
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Searing Gaze that play both.
New
Scalding Iron
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Scalding Iron that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
New
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Kindle
Kindle
Avg. played: Β 
2.082.082191781
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Kindle that play both.
New
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
New
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
New
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Slap-Happy
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.384615385
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Rampant Growth - Life
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Brush Off (Red)
Brush Off (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Brush Off (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
New
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.523809524
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Resource
Will of Arcana
Will of Arcana
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Will of Arcana that play both.
Eye of Ophidia
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Eye of Ophidia that play both.