Zap (Red)
Wizard Action
Deal 3 arcane damage to target hero.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.731.731189732
Average Defense Value:
2.522.518460718
Hero
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Kano
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Kano that play both.
Oscilio
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Oscilio that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Verdance
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Verdance that play both.
Equipment
Storm Striders
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Metacarpus Node
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Crown of Providence
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Hold Focus
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Hold Focus that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Ragamuffin's Hat
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ragamuffin's Hat that play both.
Ironsong Versus
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Mage Master Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Talismanic Lens
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Talismanic Lens that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Robe of Rapture
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Robe of Rapture that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Spell Fray Tiara
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Spell Fray Tiara that play both.
Well Grounded
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Well Grounded that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Lightning Greaves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Bastion of Unity
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Bastion of Unity that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Helm of Lignum Vitae
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Helm of Lignum Vitae that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Deep Blue
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Refraction Bolters
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Weapon
Waning Moon
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Hot Streak
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Action
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.112.107503608
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Sap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sap (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.112.107913669
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.354838710
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Swell Tidings that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.407407407
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.279069767
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Perennial Aetherbloom (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.350000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Perennial Aetherbloom (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Zap (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.322.318098720
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Zap (Blue) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.405405405
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.254716981
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Reverberate (Blue) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.242.239130435
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Voltic Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.292.287356322
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Scalding Rain (Blue) that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Aether Flare (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.352.354767184
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Flare (Blue) that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.352.349397590
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
2.722.720000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.371638142
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Snapback (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Prognosticate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.322.322784810
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Prognosticate (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.472.466666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.384615385
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played:
2.452.454081633
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.407932011
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played:
2.612.614925373
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Blazing Aether that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Snapback (Blue) that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Arc that play both.
Blessing of Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Blessing of Aether (Red) that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played:
2.382.380952381
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played:
2.602.602564103
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played:
2.562.556886228
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.562.556603774
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Aether Wildfire
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Aether Wildfire that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Pop the Bubble (Red) that play both.
Sap (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.402.403292181
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sap (Blue) that play both.
Forked Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Forked Lightning that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.434426230
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Foreboding Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Foreboding Bolt (Red) that play both.
Sonic Boom
Avg. played:
2.482.480468750
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sonic Boom that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.562.562500000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue) that play both.
Perennial Aetherbloom (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Perennial Aetherbloom (Blue) that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Timekeeper's Whim (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Timekeeper's Whim (Blue) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Cindering Foresight (Red) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Trailblazing Aether (Blue) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Snapback (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Chain Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Chain Lightning that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Captain's Call (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Captain's Call (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.682.681818182
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Wounding Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Wounding Blow (Red) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.388888889
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Plow Under that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.411764706
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played:
2.092.086330935
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Kindle that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Brush Off (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Brush Off (Red) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played:
2.392.388888889
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
2.522.523809524
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
High Voltage
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and High Voltage that play both.
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Zap (Red) and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
