Frontline Plating
Generic Equipment - Chest
At the beginning of your end phase, put a -1{d} counter on this.
Blade Break (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.531.532671437
Average Defense Value:
2.552.547591005
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Kano
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Kano that play both.
Dash, Database
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Dash, Database that play both.
Olympia
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Olympia that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Equipment
Frontline Gauntlets
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Frontline Gauntlets that play both.
Metacarpus Node
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Storm Striders
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Storm Striders that play both.
Ragamuffin's Hat
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Ragamuffin's Hat that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Crown of Providence that play both.
Aurum Aegis
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Frontline Helm
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Frontline Helm that play both.
Frontline Legs
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Frontline Legs that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Nullrune Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Hood
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Bloodied Oval
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Prized Galea
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Prized Galea that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Cogwerx Base Chest
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Cogwerx Base Chest that play both.
Cogwerx Base Head
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Cogwerx Base Head that play both.
Pouncing Paws
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Ironhide Plate
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Ironhide Plate that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Refraction Bolters
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Arcane Lantern
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Blossom of Spring
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Flat Trackers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Flat Trackers that play both.
Parry Blade
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Parry Blade that play both.
Vigor Girth
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Vigor Girth that play both.
Embrace Adversity
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Embrace Adversity that play both.
Grandstand Legplates
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Grandstand Legplates that play both.
Headliner Helm
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Headliner Helm that play both.
Overcome Adversity
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Overcome Adversity that play both.
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Balance of Justice that play both.
Blood Scent
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blood Scent that play both.
Quickstep
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Quickstep that play both.
Weapon
Waning Moon
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Waning Moon that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Symbiosis Shot
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Symbiosis Shot that play both.
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
Graven Call
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Graven Call that play both.
Action
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Energy Potion that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blazing Aether that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Quickening (Blue) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.881.879032258
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scalding Rain (Blue) that play both.
Sap (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sap (Blue) that play both.
Potion of Déjà Vu
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Potion of Déjà Vu that play both.
Prognosticate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Prognosticate (Blue) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Swell Tidings that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played:
1.851.851063830
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Flare (Blue) that play both.
Reverberate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Reverberate (Blue) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Zap (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Zap (Blue) that play both.
Sonic Boom
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sonic Boom that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.200000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Raise an Army that play both.
Boom Grenade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Boom Grenade (Red) that play both.
Boom Grenade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Boom Grenade (Yellow) that play both.
Chain Lightning
Avg. played:
1.411.410256410
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Chain Lightning that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Mini Forcefield (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Mini Forcefield (Red) that play both.
Dissolving Shield (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Dissolving Shield (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Emeritus Scolding (Yellow) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Double Down that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Voltic Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Encore
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Encore that play both.
Hadron Collider (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hadron Collider (Red) that play both.
Backup Protocol: RED
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Backup Protocol: RED that play both.
Boom Grenade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Boom Grenade (Blue) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
1.491.487804878
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Cindering Foresight (Red) that play both.
Song of Sweet Nectar
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Song of Sweet Nectar that play both.
Song of the Rosen Matador
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Song of the Rosen Matador that play both.
Song of the Shining Knight
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Song of the Shining Knight that play both.
Song of the Wandering Mind
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Song of the Wandering Mind that play both.
Song of Yesteryears
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Song of Yesteryears that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Hadron Collider (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hadron Collider (Yellow) that play both.
Overload Script
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Overload Script that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Commanding Performance that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Starting Stake
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Starting Stake that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Reckless Charge
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Reckless Charge that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Song of Jack-be-Quick
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Song of Jack-be-Quick that play both.
Attack Action
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
MetEx (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and MetEx (Red) that play both.
Down But Not Out (Red)
Avg. played:
1.251.250000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Down But Not Out (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played:
1.751.750000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Bet Big that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played:
1.601.600000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and The Golden Son that play both.
Expedite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Expedite (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.331.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Wage Gold (Blue) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Ripple Away that play both.
Show No Mercy
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Show No Mercy that play both.
Expedite (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Expedite (Blue) that play both.
Out Pace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Out Pace (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Final Act
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Final Act that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Scrap Harvester (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scrap Harvester (Blue) that play both.
Infuse Alloy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Infuse Alloy (Red) that play both.
Lay Waste (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Lay Waste (Red) that play both.
Dive Through Data (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Dive Through Data (Red) that play both.
Junkyard Dogg (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Junkyard Dogg (Red) that play both.
Data Link (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Data Link (Blue) that play both.
Dive Through Data (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Dive Through Data (Blue) that play both.
Wounded Bull (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Wounded Bull (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Pay Up
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Pay Up that play both.
Rising Energy (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Rising Energy (Blue) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Rising Energy (Yellow) that play both.
Rising Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Rising Speed (Blue) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Rising Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Wage Agility (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Wage Agility (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Wage Vigor (Yellow) that play both.
Down But Not Out (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Down But Not Out (Blue) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Standing Order that play both.
Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Under Loop (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Under Loop (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
2.112.111111111
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Up the Ante that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played:
1.251.250000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Cut the Deck (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Take the Upper Hand (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Fatal Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blade Flurry that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Hearty Block
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hearty Block that play both.
Test of Vigor
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Test of Vigor that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Test of Strength that play both.
Crowd Control (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Crowd Control (Red) that play both.
Crowd Control (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Crowd Control (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Scour
Avg. played:
1.381.384615385
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scour that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Interlude (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Interlude (Blue) that play both.
Interlude (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Interlude (Red) that play both.
Interlude (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Interlude (Yellow) that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Eye of Ophidia that play both.