Frontline Plating
Generic Equipment - Chest
At the beginning of your end phase, put a -1{d} counter on this.
Blade Break (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.701.703968163
Average Defense Value: Β
2.532.533701067
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Kano
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Kano that play both.
Scurv, Stowaway
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Verdance
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Verdance that play both.
Dash, Database
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Dash, Database that play both.
Olympia
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Olympia that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Melody, Sing-along
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Melody, Sing-along that play both.
Equipment
Frontline Gauntlets
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Frontline Gauntlets that play both.
Metacarpus Node
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Metacarpus Node that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Storm Striders that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Ragamuffin's Hat
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Ragamuffin's Hat that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Quick Clicks
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Quick Clicks that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Buccaneer's Bounty
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Helmsman's Peak
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Helmsman's Peak that play both.
Crown of Providence
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Frontline Helm
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Frontline Helm that play both.
Frontline Legs
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Frontline Legs that play both.
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Prized Galea
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Prized Galea that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Bloodied Oval
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Aurum Aegis
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Well Grounded
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Well Grounded that play both.
Hold Focus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hold Focus that play both.
Four Finger Gloves
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Four Finger Gloves that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Coat of Allegiance
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
Red Alert Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Red Alert Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Mask of Deceit
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Ironhide Plate
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Ironhide Plate that play both.
Gallantry Gold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Refraction Bolters
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Blossom of Spring
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Balance of Justice that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Weapon
Waning Moon
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Waning Moon that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Crucible of Aetherweave
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Symbiosis Shot
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Symbiosis Shot that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Jinglewood, Smash Hit
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Jinglewood, Smash Hit that play both.
Action
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Energy Potion that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blazing Aether that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Quickening (Blue) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scalding Rain (Blue) that play both.
Sap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sap (Blue) that play both.
Potion of DΓ©jΓ Vu
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Potion of DΓ©jΓ Vu that play both.
Prognosticate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Prognosticate (Blue) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Swell Tidings that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Flare (Blue) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Reverberate (Blue) that play both.
Zap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Zap (Blue) that play both.
Sonic Boom
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sonic Boom that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Portside Exchange that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Shifting Tides
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Shifting Tides that play both.
Amethyst Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Amethyst Amulet that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Pounamu Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Pounamu Amulet that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Sapphire Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sapphire Amulet that play both.
Scour
Avg. played: Β
1.431.428571429
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scour that play both.
Chain Lightning
Avg. played: Β
1.431.425000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Chain Lightning that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Dissolving Shield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Dissolving Shield (Red) that play both.
Boom Grenade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Boom Grenade (Red) that play both.
Boom Grenade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Boom Grenade (Yellow) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Emeritus Scolding (Yellow) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Voltic Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Backup Protocol: RED
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Backup Protocol: RED that play both.
Mini Forcefield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Mini Forcefield (Red) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.541.543478261
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Cindering Foresight (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Perennial Aetherbloom (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Perennial Aetherbloom (Blue) that play both.
Agility Stance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Agility Stance that play both.
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Flurry Stance that play both.
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Power Stance that play both.
Ring of Roses
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Ring of Roses that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Cut from the Same Cloth (Blue) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Cut from the Same Cloth (Yellow) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sworn Vengeance (Yellow) that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Kiss of Death that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Up Sticks and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Public Bounty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Public Bounty (Blue) that play both.
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
Public Bounty (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Public Bounty (Yellow) that play both.
Boom Grenade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Boom Grenade (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Double Down that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Raise an Army that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Encore
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Encore that play both.
Attack Action
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Battalion Barque (Yellow) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and For the Dracai that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Expedite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Expedite (Red) that play both.
MetEx (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and MetEx (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Command and Conquer that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Fruits of the Forest (Yellow) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Expedite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Expedite (Blue) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Pick Up the Point (Yellow) that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and For the Emperor that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Pursue to the Pits of Despair
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Pursue to the Pits of Despair that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Outed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Outed that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
Tip-Off (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Tip-Off (Red) that play both.
Tip-Off (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Tip-Off (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Bonds of Memory (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Dive Through Data (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Dive Through Data (Red) that play both.
Out Pace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Out Pace (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Bet Big that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and The Golden Son that play both.
Attack Reaction
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Endear Devotion that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.362.357142857
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Up the Ante that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Provoke that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Blistering Blade that play both.
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Hunt's End that play both.
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Imperial Intent that play both.
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scalding Iron that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Searing Gaze that play both.
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sisters of Fire that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Perforate that play both.
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Incision (Red) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Take a Stab (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Take a Stab (Red) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and To the Point (Red) that play both.
Exposed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Exposed that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Den of the Spider that play both.
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Smoke Out that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Lay Low
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Lay Low that play both.
Instant
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Kindle that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Eye of Ophidia that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Frontline Plating and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.