Eclipse Existence
Shadow Generic Instant
Whenever an attack you control hits a Light hero this turn, you may banish a card from their soul. If they do, they lose 1[Life].
If you have more [Life] than an opposing Light hero, you may banish an action card from your graveyard.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.083.083170293
Average Defense Value:
2.382.375599486
Hero
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Levia, Shadowborn Abomination that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Chane, Bound by Shadow
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Chane, Bound by Shadow that play both.
Levia
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Levia that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Chane that play both.
Vynnset
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Vynnset that play both.
Equipment
Ebon Fold
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Ebon Fold that play both.
Carrion Husk
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Carrion Husk that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Face Purgatory
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Face Purgatory that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Base of the Mountain
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Bloodied Oval
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Crown of Providence
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Crown of Providence that play both.
Aether Ironweave
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Hooves of the Shadowbeast that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Nullrune Robe
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Nullrune Boots
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Cloak of Darkness
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Cloak of Darkness that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Spoiled Skull
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Spoiled Skull that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Shroud of Darkness
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shroud of Darkness that play both.
Dance of Darkness
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Skullhorn
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Skullhorn that play both.
Flat Trackers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Flat Trackers that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Runehold Release
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Runehold Release that play both.
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Nullrune Hood that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Weapon
Flail of Agony
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Flail of Agony that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Nebula Blade
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Nebula Blade that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Rosetta Thorn
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Scepter of Pain
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Hell Hammer
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Hell Hammer that play both.
Mandible Claw
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Mandible Claw that play both.
Hexagore, the Death Hydra
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Hexagore, the Death Hydra that play both.
Reaping Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Reaping Blade that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Galaxxi Black
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Galaxxi Black that play both.
Action
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.902.900000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Cull
Avg. played:
2.862.857142857
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Cull that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.892.888888889
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Painful Passage
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Painful Passage that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
2.772.767857143
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Machinations of Dominion
Avg. played:
2.832.833333333
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Machinations of Dominion that play both.
Succumb to Temptation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Succumb to Temptation that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Malefic Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Eloquent Eulogy
Avg. played:
2.782.777777778
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Eloquent Eulogy that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Midas Touch that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.700000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.380952381
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Funeral Moon that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Seeds of Agony (Yellow) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Seeds of Agony (Blue) that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.277777778
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.392.388888889
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Red)
Avg. played:
1.701.700000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Unworldly Bellow (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Deadwood Dirge (Yellow) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.470588235
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.545454545
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Seeping Shadows (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Seeping Shadows (Yellow) that play both.
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Shaden Scream (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shaden Scream (Blue) that play both.
Shadowrealm Horror
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shadowrealm Horror that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Tome of Torment
Avg. played:
1.361.357142857
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Tome of Torment that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Unworldly Bellow (Blue) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Plunder Run (Blue) that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Chains of Mephetis
Avg. played:
2.142.142857143
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Chains of Mephetis that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Tear Through the Portal (Yellow) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Tear Through the Portal (Red) that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.142.142857143
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Vile Inquisition (Yellow) that play both.
Shaden Scream (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shaden Scream (Yellow) that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Condemn to Slaughter (Red) that play both.
Condemn to Slaughter (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Condemn to Slaughter (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Yellow) that play both.
Spew Shadow (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Spew Shadow (Blue) that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.092.090909091
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue) that play both.
Spew Shadow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Spew Shadow (Yellow) that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.451.454545455
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Unworldly Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
Spew Shadow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Spew Shadow (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Dimenxxional Gateway (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Dimenxxional Gateway (Red) that play both.
Shaden Scream (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shaden Scream (Red) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Beseech the Demigon (Blue) that play both.
Grim Feast (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Grim Feast (Blue) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Tear Through the Portal (Blue) that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Vile Inquisition (Blue) that play both.
Vile Inquisition (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Vile Inquisition (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Buckwild (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Buckwild (Red) that play both.
Familiar Stench
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Familiar Stench that play both.
Call for Backup
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Call for Backup that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Soul Reaping
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Soul Reaping that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.692307692
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.777777778
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Soul Harvest that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.685714286
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Shadow of Ursur
Avg. played:
2.692.685714286
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shadow of Ursur that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Command and Conquer that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.242.238095238
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Unhallowed Rites (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.724137931
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Unhallowed Rites (Red) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.733333333
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.442.444444444
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
2.732.733333333
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Vexing Malice that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.483870968
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Dread Screamer (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.302.303030303
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Deadwood Rumbler (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.727272727
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.266666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Boneyard Marauder (Red) that play both.
Unhallowed Rites (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Unhallowed Rites (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.082.083333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.142.142857143
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Graveling Growl (Red) that play both.
Soul Cleaver (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.545454545
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Soul Cleaver (Red) that play both.
Soul Butcher (Red)
Avg. played:
2.142.142857143
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Soul Butcher (Red) that play both.
Endless Maw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.647058824
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Endless Maw (Red) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.921.920000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Graveling Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.392.388888889
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow) that play both.
Rift Bind (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.552.550000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Rift Bind (Yellow) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.312500000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Deadwood Rumbler (Red) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.412.411764706
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Bounding Demigon (Blue) that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Bounding Demigon (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.625000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.092.090909091
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Dread Screamer (Blue) that play both.
Slithering Shadowpede
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Slithering Shadowpede that play both.
Soul Butcher (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Soul Butcher (Blue) that play both.
Soul Butcher (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Soul Butcher (Yellow) that play both.
Soul Cleaver (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Soul Cleaver (Blue) that play both.
Hungering Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.072.071428571
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Hungering Demigon (Red) that play both.
Shaden Swing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.631.625000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shaden Swing (Yellow) that play both.
Lunartide Plunderer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.042.043478261
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Lunartide Plunderer (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.642.642857143
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Deadwood Rumbler (Yellow) that play both.
Consuming Aftermath (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Consuming Aftermath (Red) that play both.
Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Flock of the Feather Walkers (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.529411765
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Rip Through Reality (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Belittle (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Belittle (Yellow) that play both.
Lunartide Plunderer (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.232.230769231
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Lunartide Plunderer (Yellow) that play both.
Hungering Demigon (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Hungering Demigon (Blue) that play both.
Hungering Demigon (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Hungering Demigon (Yellow) that play both.
Soul Cleaver (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Soul Cleaver (Yellow) that play both.
Tribute to Demolition (Red)
Avg. played:
1.571.571428571
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Tribute to Demolition (Red) that play both.
Battlefield Breaker (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Battlefield Breaker (Yellow) that play both.
Diabolic Offering
Avg. played:
2.102.100000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Diabolic Offering that play both.
Shaden Death Hydra
Avg. played:
1.861.857142857
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shaden Death Hydra that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Writhing Beast Hulk (Red) that play both.
Deep Rooted Evil
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Deep Rooted Evil that play both.
Void Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Void Wraith (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Beast
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Mark of the Beast that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Hocus Pocus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Hocus Pocus (Red) that play both.
Smashing Performance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Smashing Performance that play both.
Shadow of Blasmophet
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shadow of Blasmophet that play both.
Rift Bind (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Rift Bind (Blue) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shrill of Skullform (Yellow) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Tribute to the Legions of Doom (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Tribute to the Legions of Doom (Red) that play both.
Ram Raider (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Ram Raider (Red) that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Shaden Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shaden Swing (Red) that play both.
Wall Breaker (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Wall Breaker (Red) that play both.
Consuming Aftermath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Consuming Aftermath (Yellow) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Dread Screamer (Yellow) that play both.
Void Wraith (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Void Wraith (Yellow) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Boneyard Marauder (Blue) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Blue) that play both.
Mutated Mass
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Mutated Mass that play both.
Lunartide Plunderer (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Lunartide Plunderer (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Beast Within that play both.
Smash with Big Tree (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Smash with Big Tree (Yellow) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Meat and Greet (Blue) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Consuming Volition (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Exposed
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Exposed that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.687500000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Lay Low
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Lay Low that play both.
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Avg. played:
1.771.769230769
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Guardian of the Shadowrealm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Reckless Swing that play both.
Block
Haunting Rendition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Haunting Rendition that play both.
Instant
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Art of War that play both.
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Oblivion that play both.
Invert Existence
Avg. played:
1.821.825000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Invert Existence that play both.
Slay
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Slay that play both.
Doomsday
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Doomsday that play both.
Eclipse
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Eclipse that play both.
No Fear
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and No Fear that play both.
Blood Tribute (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.382.384615385
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Blood Tribute (Blue) that play both.
Blood Tribute (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Blood Tribute (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Blood Tribute (Red)
Avg. played:
1.551.545454545
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Blood Tribute (Red) that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Eclipse Existence and Eye of Ophidia that play both.