Flat Trackers
Brute,warrior Equipment - Legs
Action -- Destroy this: Create an Agility token. Go again
Blade Break (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.153.154952396
Average Defense Value: Β
2.392.389370932
Hero
Olympia, Prized Fighter
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Fang
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Fang that play both.
Olympia
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Olympia that play both.
Kassai
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Kassai that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Rhinar
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Rhinar that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlet of Might
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Prized Galea
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Prized Galea that play both.
Beckon Applause
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Beckon Applause that play both.
Vigor Girth
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Vigor Girth that play both.
Raw Meat
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Raw Meat that play both.
Knucklehead
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Knucklehead that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Old Knocker
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Old Knocker that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Nullrune Hood
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gallantry Gold
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Savage Sash
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Savage Sash that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Parry Blade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Parry Blade that play both.
Monstrous Veil
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Monstrous Veil that play both.
Ironsong Versus
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Ironsong Versus that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Red Alert Visor
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Red Alert Visor that play both.
Red Alert Gloves
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Red Alert Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Hide Tanner
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Hide Tanner that play both.
Refraction Bolters
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Vow of Vengeance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Vow of Vengeance that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Mandible Claw that play both.
Cintari Saber
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hot Streak
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Hot Streak that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Ball Breaker
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Ball Breaker that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Mini Meataxe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Mini Meataxe that play both.
Action
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
2.692.692810458
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.212.206730769
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.322.316270567
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.391120507
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.423157895
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
2.392.393939394
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Unsheathed that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.366233766
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.385416667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Bonebreaker Bellow (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.462.461538462
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Trot Along that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.523510972
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.602.598425197
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Double Down that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Lead with Power (Red) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Bonebreaker Bellow (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.555555556
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Lead with Power (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Cash In that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Commanding Performance that play both.
Attack Action
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.212.205724508
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.252.253075571
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.243445693
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.212.213552361
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.212.205673759
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.222.222760291
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.242.236842105
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.352.354523227
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.312.310734463
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Sea Legs that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400651466
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Mighty Windup (Red) that play both.
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and For the Dracai that play both.
Pack Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Pack Call (Blue) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Pound Town (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Pound Town (Yellow) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Pack Hunt (Yellow) that play both.
Pack Call (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Pack Call (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Runner Runner that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Rawhide Rumble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Rawhide Rumble (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Smash Instinct (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Rising Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Rising Power (Red) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Rally the Rearguard (Red) that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Pack Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Pack Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Rearguard (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Rally the Rearguard (Yellow) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Savage Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Savage Swing (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.662.661931818
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Up the Ante that play both.
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Blistering Blade that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.495978552
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Searing Gaze that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.462.461538462
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Provoke that play both.
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Imperial Intent that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.393442623
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Scalding Iron that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Incision (Red) that play both.
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Sisters of Fire that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Sizzling Steel that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Cut the Deck (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.476470588
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Smoke Out that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
2.382.378151261
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.482.476190476
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Flat Trackers and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.