Hungry for More
Guardian Instant - Aura
Suspense
When this leaves the arena, gain 3{h}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.672.670786788
Average Defense Value:
2.792.793934129
Hero
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
New
Pleiades, Superstar
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Pleiades, Superstar that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Nullrune Boots
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Arcane Lantern
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Crown of Providence
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Crown of Providence that play both.
Craterhoof
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Craterhoof that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Heart of Ice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Heart of Ice that play both.
Coronet Peak
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Coronet Peak that play both.
Tectonic Plating
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Ironhide Legs
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Balance of Justice that play both.
Well Grounded
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Well Grounded that play both.
Civic Steps
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Civic Steps that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Anothos
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Anothos that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
2.932.930232558
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Tear Asunder that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Imposing Visage that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Buckle that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Midas Touch that play both.
Blessing of Patience (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Blessing of Patience (Red) that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Truce
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Truce that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Show Time! that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
Healing Balm (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Healing Balm (Red) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Trot Along that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Channel the Bleak Expanse
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Channel the Bleak Expanse that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and This Round's on Me that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Leave a Dent that play both.
Attack Action
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Headbutt that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Oaken Old that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Crippling Crush that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Ripple Away that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Star Struck that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Bet Big that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Plow Under that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Boulder Drop that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Spinal Crush that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.932.931818182
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.850000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Steadfast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.777777778
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Steadfast (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Remembrance that play both.
Blessing of Serenity (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Blessing of Serenity (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Calming Breeze that play both.
Withstand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.583333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Withstand (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Peace of Mind (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Peace of Mind (Red) that play both.
Poison the Well
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Poison the Well that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Steadfast (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Steadfast (Blue) that play both.
Withstand (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Withstand (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Heart of Fyendal that play both.