banner
New
Hungry for More
40 decks (0.005571%)
Price History
Hungry for More
Guardian Instant - Aura
Suspense When this leaves the arena, gain 3{h}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.392.394572328
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.772.768925121
Hero
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
New
Pleiades, Superstar
Pleiades, Superstar
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Pleiades, Superstar that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
Betsy, Skin in the Game
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
Bravo, Showstopper
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Arcane Lantern that play both.
New
Attention Grabbers
Attention Grabbers
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Attention Grabbers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Crown of Providence that play both.
New
Horns of the Despised
Horns of the Despised
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Horns of the Despised that play both.
Craterhoof
Craterhoof
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Craterhoof that play both.
Coronet Peak
Coronet Peak
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Coronet Peak that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Heart of Ice
Heart of Ice
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Heart of Ice that play both.
Ironhide Legs
Ironhide Legs
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
Good Time Chapeau
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
New
Ironfist Revelation
Ironfist Revelation
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Ironfist Revelation that play both.
New
Mightybone Knuckles
Mightybone Knuckles
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Mightybone Knuckles that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
Stonewall Impasse
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Balance of Justice that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
Steelbraid Buckler
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Well Grounded
Well Grounded
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Well Grounded that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
Ironhide Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Gauntlet of Might
Gauntlet of Might
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Gauntlet of Might that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
New
Boots to the Boards
Boots to the Boards
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Boots to the Boards that play both.
New
Helm of the Adored
Helm of the Adored
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Helm of the Adored that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Anothos that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Tear Asunder that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Imposing Visage that play both.
New
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.866666667
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Booze! that play both.
New
Two Steps Ahead
Two Steps Ahead
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.764705882
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Two Steps Ahead that play both.
New
Cruel Ambition
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.785714286
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Cruel Ambition that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Buckle that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Midas Touch that play both.
New
Revolting Gesture
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Revolting Gesture that play both.
New
Sadistic Scowl
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.700000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
Blessing of Patience (Red)
Blessing of Patience (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Blessing of Patience (Red) that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Healing Balm (Red)
Healing Balm (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Healing Balm (Red) that play both.
Truce
Truce
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Truce that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Trot Along that play both.
New
Villainous Pose (Red)
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and This Round's on Me that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
New
Villainous Pose (Blue)
Villainous Pose (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Villainous Pose (Blue) that play both.
New
Cheap Shot
Cheap Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Cheap Shot that play both.
Show Time!
Show Time!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Show Time! that play both.
Channel the Bleak Expanse
Channel the Bleak Expanse
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Channel the Bleak Expanse that play both.
New
Beat the Same Drum
Beat the Same Drum
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Beat the Same Drum that play both.
Never Yield
Never Yield
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Never Yield that play both.
Stamp Authority
Stamp Authority
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Stamp Authority that play both.
New
Cheers!
Cheers!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Cheers! that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Power Play (Blue)
Power Play (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Power Play (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
New
Short Shrift
Short Shrift
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Short Shrift that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833333333
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
New
Escalate Violence
Escalate Violence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Escalate Violence that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Cranial Crush that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
New
Bully Tactics
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714285714
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Bully Tactics that play both.
New
Wee Wrecking Ball
Wee Wrecking Ball
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Wee Wrecking Ball that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Overcrowded that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Headbutt
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Headbutt that play both.
New
Goon Beatdown
Goon Beatdown
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Goon Beatdown that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
New
Cut a Long Story Short
Cut a Long Story Short
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Cut a Long Story Short that play both.
New
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454545455
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
New
Spew Obscenities
Spew Obscenities
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Spew Obscenities that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Oaken Old
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Oaken Old that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Ripple Away
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Ripple Away that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Thump (Blue) that play both.
New
No Tall Tales
No Tall Tales
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and No Tall Tales that play both.
New
Cut the Small Talk
Cut the Small Talk
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Cut the Small Talk that play both.
Bet Big
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Bet Big that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Crippling Crush
Crippling Crush
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Crippling Crush that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Command and Conquer that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Plow Under that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
New
Power Play (Red)
Power Play (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Power Play (Red) that play both.
New
Fix the Match
Fix the Match
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Fix the Match that play both.
New
Overturn the Results
Overturn the Results
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Overturn the Results that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Blue) that play both.
Star Struck
Star Struck
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Star Struck that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Boulder Drop that play both.
New
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue)
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue) that play both.
New
Story Beats (Blue)
Story Beats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Story Beats (Blue) that play both.
New
Story Beats (Yellow)
Story Beats (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Story Beats (Yellow) that play both.
New
Cries of Encore
Cries of Encore
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Cries of Encore that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
New
Cut Off at the Knees
Cut Off at the Knees
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Cut Off at the Knees that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714285714
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
New
Truth or Trickery
Truth or Trickery
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Truth or Trickery that play both.
New
Turning Point
Turning Point
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Turning Point that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.878787879
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
New
Leave Them Hanging
Leave Them Hanging
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Leave Them Hanging that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
Steadfast (Red)
Steadfast (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.785714286
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Steadfast (Red) that play both.
New
Tension in the Air (Red)
Tension in the Air (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Tension in the Air (Red) that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Edge of Their Seats (Blue) that play both.
New
What Happens Next?
What Happens Next?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and What Happens Next? that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.691.692307692
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Remembrance that play both.
Blessing of Serenity (Red)
Blessing of Serenity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Blessing of Serenity (Red) that play both.
New
Act of Glory (Blue)
Act of Glory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Act of Glory (Blue) that play both.
New
Tension in the Air (Blue)
Tension in the Air (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Tension in the Air (Blue) that play both.
New
Liar's Charm
Liar's Charm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Liar's Charm that play both.
Withstand (Red)
Withstand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Withstand (Red) that play both.
New
Act of Glory (Red)
Act of Glory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Act of Glory (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
New
The Suspense is Killing Me
The Suspense is Killing Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and The Suspense is Killing Me that play both.
New
To Be Continued...
To Be Continued...
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and To Be Continued... that play both.
Poison the Well
Poison the Well
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Poison the Well that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Calming Breeze that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Steadfast (Blue)
Steadfast (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Steadfast (Blue) that play both.
Steadfast (Yellow)
Steadfast (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Steadfast (Yellow) that play both.
Withstand (Blue)
Withstand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Withstand (Blue) that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
New
Dramatic Pause (Red)
Dramatic Pause (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Dramatic Pause (Red) that play both.
New
Tension in the Air (Yellow)
Tension in the Air (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Tension in the Air (Yellow) that play both.
New
In the Palm of Your Hand
In the Palm of Your Hand
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and In the Palm of Your Hand that play both.
New
Up on a Pedestal
Up on a Pedestal
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Up on a Pedestal that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hungry for More and Heart of Fyendal that play both.