banner
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
1224 decks (0.2159%)
Price History
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +3{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create a Vigor token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.331.331160788
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.582.576432468
Hero
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia
Olympia
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Olympia that play both.
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea that play both.
Kassai
Kassai
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
Hood of Red Sand
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Parry Blade
Parry Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Parry Blade that play both.
Deep Blue
Deep Blue
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
Jubeel, Spellbane
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
New
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Action
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.726562500
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.722222222
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.388081395
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.502431118
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.277647059
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.482832618
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.495475113
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.281553398
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.260135135
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.420485175
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.508433735
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.663333333
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.457063712
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.563798220
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.665492958
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.441358025
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
New
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642553191
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.480144404
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.651960784
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.371980676
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Cleave
Cleave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cleave that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.426315789
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Spill Blood
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
New
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Blue)
Sharpen Steel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.431137725
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
New
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.534883721
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.495652174
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.722222222
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.348460292
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.719298246
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.722488038
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.294117647
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.435416667
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
New
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636363636
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636363636
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.695792880
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.301526718
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.383050847
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.433224756
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.393822394
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.645833333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.402439024
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.377192982
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.689655172
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.349514563
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.328282828
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.596938776
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Rout that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.579881657
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.441860465
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Blue)
Stroke of Foresight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Blue) that play both.
Out for Blood (Blue)
Out for Blood (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Blue) that play both.
New
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Endear Devotion that play both.
New
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Imperial Intent that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.527542373
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.444444444
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
New
Put in Context
Put in Context
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Put in Context that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.352941176
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554054054
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
New
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Calming Breeze that play both.