Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +3{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create a Vigor token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.341.335281126
Average Defense Value:
2.572.571242142
Hero
Olympia, Prized Fighter
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Olympia that play both.
Kassai
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Prized Galea
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gallantry Gold
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Vigor Girth
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Ironsong Versus
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Beckon Applause
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Flat Trackers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Parry Blade
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Parry Blade that play both.
Deep Blue
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Cintari Saber
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hatchet of Body
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
2.582.578947368
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played:
2.722.722772277
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.392.389694042
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.505319149
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.277353690
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.492.492924528
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.292096220
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.503703704
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.262.260073260
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.532258065
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.416413374
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
2.662.660649819
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.570032573
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
2.652.653992395
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.487577640
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.451048951
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.642.642553191
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.492.492063492
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
2.652.654639175
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.391304348
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cleave that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.372.366013072
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.443113772
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.428571429
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.542124542
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.507246377
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.361510791
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.732.732057416
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
2.722.716883117
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.434180139
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.712.707746479
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.626582278
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.302.304878049
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.384905660
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.442.438596491
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.381974249
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
2.672.668224299
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.402.403508772
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.382.380952381
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.689839572
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.331491713
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.345029240
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.625698324
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Rout that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
2.592.589743590
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.446666667
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Blue) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Run Through that play both.
Out for Blood (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.530266344
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.452.447004608
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Saving Grace that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.408450704
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played:
2.562.556390977
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.