Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +3{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create a Vigor token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.321.322083390
Average Defense Value:
2.582.581299946
Hero
Olympia, Prized Fighter
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Olympia that play both.
Dorinthea
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Dorinthea that play both.
Kassai
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Prized Galea
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gallantry Gold
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Vigor Girth
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Ironsong Versus
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Beckon Applause
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Flat Trackers
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Blossom of Spring
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Parry Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Parry Blade that play both.
Deep Blue
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Cintari Saber
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Dawnblade
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Dawnblade that play both.
Hatchet of Body
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Action
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.402.398657718
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played:
2.742.736111111
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
2.712.707692308
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.506042296
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.285087719
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.492.493975904
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.502083333
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.286585366
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.262.262820513
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.424623116
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.505592841
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.454545455
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
2.672.673981191
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
2.682.675409836
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.574647887
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.446685879
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
2.612.608695652
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.482.484949833
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.642.642553191
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.370535714
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
2.662.655660377
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cleave that play both.
Felling Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.425120773
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Felling Swing (Red) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Hold 'em (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.452.449438202
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Hold 'em (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.534591195
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.491803279
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Provoke
Avg. played:
2.692.686274510
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.352496218
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.722.720164609
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
2.732.726244344
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.425047438
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played:
2.592.593750000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.712.705705706
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.647222222
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.383647799
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.302.301818182
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.427710843
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
2.642.644531250
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.404332130
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.402.401515152
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.382.378048780
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.334821429
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.325791855
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.612.610576923
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Rout that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.430107527
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
2.592.593220339
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Blue) that play both.
Out for Blood (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Out for Blood (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Run Through that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.532038835
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.462.458333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played:
2.552.551515152
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Vigorous Engagement (Red) and Slap-Happy that play both.