Rising Energy (Red)
Warrior,guardian Attack Action - Attack
If you've drawn a card this turn, this costs {r} less to play.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.162.155219579
Average Defense Value: Β
2.522.522715335
Hero
Olympia
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Olympia that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Valda, Seismic Impact
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Kassai
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Equipment
Prized Galea
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Prized Galea that play both.
Refraction Bolters
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Ironsong Versus
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Nullrune Hood
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Vigor Girth
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Beckon Applause
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Gallantry Gold
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Flat Trackers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Parry Blade
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Parry Blade that play both.
Bastion of Unity
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Bastion of Unity that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Crown of Providence
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Old Knocker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Arcane Lantern
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Cintari Saber
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Hatchet of Body
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
2.692.694736842
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.589603283
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.581867388
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.472.466666667
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.562.560581583
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.539087948
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.612.614224138
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Double Down that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.379396985
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
2.572.567901235
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Unsheathed that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.504237288
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.682.680115274
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.328990228
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.662.656250000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.382.379310345
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.642.643790850
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.520134228
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Leave a Dent that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Promising Terrain that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.403508772
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.508021390
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Spoils of War that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Spill Blood that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Blue) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Surface Shaking that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.373443983
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
2.792.791925466
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Runner Runner that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.506147541
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.470842333
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.648979592
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.370558376
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Put 'Em In Their Place
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Put 'Em In Their Place that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Rising Energy (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.488235294
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Rising Energy (Blue) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Attack Reaction
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.792.793103448
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Up the Ante that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Provoke that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
2.802.803097345
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.644007156
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.282.280219780
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.715654952
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.546583851
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.526315789
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.620087336
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Agile Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.439655172
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.442.442982456
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.625668449
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.452702703
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Cut the Deck (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.492957746
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Fatal Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.637860082
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.562.556666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Put in Context
Avg. played: Β
2.532.533333333
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Put in Context that play both.
Block
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
2.412.408163265
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.528301887
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Seismic Eruption
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Seismic Eruption that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Rising Energy (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.