Agile Engagement (Blue)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +1{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.201.198230211
Average Defense Value:
2.622.620558195
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dorinthea that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Kassai
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Kassai that play both.
Olympia
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Olympia that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gallantry Gold
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Prized Galea
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Prized Galea that play both.
Crown of Providence
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Vigor Girth
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Flat Trackers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Beckon Applause
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Ironsong Versus
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Old Knocker
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Old Knocker that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Parry Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Parry Blade that play both.
Weapon
Cintari Saber
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hot Streak
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hot Streak that play both.
Dawnblade
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dawnblade that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hatchet of Body
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Action
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.362.360554700
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.310996564
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.572.568994889
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
2.732.728813559
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Unsheathed that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.208860759
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
2.772.771986971
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Spoils of War that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.222.220000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.245551601
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.426966292
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.247148289
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
2.732.730612245
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.384892086
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.423076923
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played:
2.692.690476190
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.412.408088235
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.480968858
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.698564593
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
2.652.650000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.419087137
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.372.369791667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
2.582.576354680
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.469696970
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.452941176
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Spill Blood that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Double Down that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played:
2.492.489795918
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Driving Blade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Driving Blade (Blue) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Raise an Army that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.355000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.492.488000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.332844575
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.742.738219895
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Provoke that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
2.742.743902439
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played:
2.762.764705882
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.561797753
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.242.242320819
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.420054201
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.767175573
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.430199430
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.412.413793103
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.431506849
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
2.212.213114754
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.344537815
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.312.314009662
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rout that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.547008547
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
2.682.680851064
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Up the Ante that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.382.380952381
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.370588235
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.484210526
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Run Through that play both.
Cut the Deck (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cut the Deck (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
1.551.545454545
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.632794457
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.472.469072165
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.372.368571429
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.
