Agile Engagement (Blue)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +1{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.221.218283697
Average Defense Value:
2.622.619539495
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dorinthea that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Kassai
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Kassai that play both.
Olympia
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Olympia that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gallantry Gold
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Prized Galea
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Prized Galea that play both.
Crown of Providence
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Vigor Girth
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Beckon Applause
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Ironsong Versus
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blossom of Spring
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Parry Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Parry Blade that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Ironrot Helm
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Weapon
Cintari Saber
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hot Streak
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hot Streak that play both.
Dawnblade
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dawnblade that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.232.228441755
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.308957952
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
2.672.673913043
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Unsheathed that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.562.562841530
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
2.192.190972222
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
2.782.778156997
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Spoils of War that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played:
2.712.707317073
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.222.215328467
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.242.238461538
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.422287390
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.247967480
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
2.742.740585774
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.378787879
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.412.411764706
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.392.393700787
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.461832061
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.698979592
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.412.413793103
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.362.357142857
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
2.552.547872340
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.443243243
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played:
2.142.142857143
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.440789474
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Spill Blood that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Double Down that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.582.580882353
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.503496503
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Driving Blade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Driving Blade (Blue) that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Raise an Army that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.357142857
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.323390895
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.732.732710280
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
2.732.734908136
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played:
2.642.642857143
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Provoke that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.555555556
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.232.227611940
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.410404624
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.761904762
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.418960245
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.402.402684564
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.422.416666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played:
2.732.731343284
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Twinning Blade that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.340807175
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
2.192.189349112
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Rout
Avg. played:
1.291.286458333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rout that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.292.290322581
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
2.682.677595628
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Up the Ante that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.543378995
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.052.050847458
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.356687898
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.472826087
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
1.581.577777778
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played:
2.572.570370370
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Run Through that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
Cut the Deck (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cut the Deck (Blue) that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.628297362
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.462.462365591
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.372.365325077
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.