Agile Engagement (Blue)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +1{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.221.216799289
Average Defense Value:
2.642.639841729
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Kassai
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Kassai that play both.
Olympia
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Olympia that play both.
Dorinthea
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dorinthea that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gallantry Gold
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Prized Galea
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Prized Galea that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironsong Versus
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Vigor Girth
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Flat Trackers
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Beckon Applause
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Balance of Justice
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Parry Blade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Parry Blade that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Crown of Dominion
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Weapon
Dawnblade
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dawnblade that play both.
Cintari Saber
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hot Streak
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hot Streak that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.366666667
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.626506024
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.232.231707317
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
2.842.839622642
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Spoils of War that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
2.762.756218905
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.822485207
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
2.242.244604317
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.477157360
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.250000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.272.275000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
2.422.419580420
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.662.658536585
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.392.388888889
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.492.486111111
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
2.182.181286550
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.449152542
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played:
2.502.496062992
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.470588235
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.445652174
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Double Down that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.515789474
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Spill Blood that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.488372093
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.447368421
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.562.558823529
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Raise an Army that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cleave that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.508196721
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.464912281
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.394736842
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Runner Runner that play both.
Attack Reaction
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.772.769452450
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.351351351
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
2.782.781250000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played:
2.832.826530612
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.594262295
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.759776536
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played:
2.772.769736842
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.382.379120879
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played:
1.281.283870968
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rout that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.445054945
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.458563536
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.251908397
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.072.065088757
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
2.112.110132159
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.442.440251572
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.522012579
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.401709402
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
2.642.636363636
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Up the Ante that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.577319588
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played:
2.562.556962025
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Run Through that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Cut the Deck (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cut the Deck (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.709090909
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.736842105
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.562.559633028
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.322.315436242
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.
Ironsong Pride
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Pride that play both.