banner
Agile Engagement (Blue)
1119 decks (0.1651%)
Price History
Agile Engagement (Blue)
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target Warrior attack gets +1{p}. If it's defended by an attack action card, create an Agility token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.211.209446974
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.622.617125672
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dorinthea that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Kassai
Kassai
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Kassai that play both.
Olympia
Olympia
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Olympia that play both.
Equipment
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Prized Galea that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Vigor Girth
Vigor Girth
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigor Girth that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Flat Trackers
Flat Trackers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
Hood of Red Sand
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Beckon Applause
Beckon Applause
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Beckon Applause that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Captain's Coat
Captain's Coat
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Captain's Coat that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Old Knocker that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Parry Blade
Parry Blade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Parry Blade that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Weapon
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hot Streak that play both.
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Dawnblade that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Action
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.238165680
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.303191489
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Unsheathed
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.705882353
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Unsheathed that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.560283688
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.192.191419142
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.771043771
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Spoils of War that play both.
Draw Swords (Blue)
Draw Swords (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.211072664
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Blue) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Engaged Swiftblade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.238970588
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Lead with Speed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Yellow) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.421652422
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Engaged Swiftblade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.246093750
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Red) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.690476190
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.738589212
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Commanding Performance that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.380952381
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.414893617
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.398467433
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.470149254
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.698492462
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.418410042
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Engaged Swiftblade (Yellow) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Lead with Speed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.363636364
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Speed (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Edge Ahead (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Edge Ahead (Yellow) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.559585492
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.457894737
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.434782609
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Spill Blood
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Spill Blood that play both.
Lead with Heart (Red)
Lead with Heart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Lead with Heart (Red) that play both.
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Trot Along that play both.
Double Down
Double Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Double Down that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.580882353
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cash In that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.493055556
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.503448276
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Driving Blade (Red)
Driving Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Driving Blade (Red) that play both.
Driving Blade (Blue)
Driving Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Driving Blade (Blue) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Raise an Army
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Raise an Army that play both.
Attack Action
Jack Be Quick
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Rising Energy (Red)
Rising Energy (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rising Energy (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rising Speed (Red)
Rising Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rising Speed (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.356783920
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Red)
Wage Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Red) that play both.
Wage Agility (Blue)
Wage Agility (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Agility (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Trade In (Red)
Trade In (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Trade In (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Trade In (Yellow)
Trade In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Trade In (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Agile Engagement (Red)
Agile Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.323216995
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.732240437
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826086957
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Provoke that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Jagged Edge that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.738578680
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.553191489
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Vigorous Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.232394366
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.410614525
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.422287390
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.765625000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.403225806
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.423487544
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.205128205
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.726829268
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Twinning Blade that play both.
Cut the Deck (Red)
Cut the Deck (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cut the Deck (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Vigorous Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.293814433
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Vigorous Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Rout that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.679144385
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Up the Ante that play both.
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Agile Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Agile Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.546666667
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.052.049586777
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.361963190
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.478723404
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Fatal Engagement (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Yellow) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Run Through
Run Through
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.585714286
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Run Through that play both.
Cut the Deck (Blue)
Cut the Deck (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Cut the Deck (Blue) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Fatal Engagement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.561.561151079
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fatal Engagement (Red) that play both.
Chorus of Ironsong
Chorus of Ironsong
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Chorus of Ironsong that play both.
Overpower (Yellow)
Overpower (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Overpower (Yellow) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Take the Upper Hand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take the Upper Hand (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Ironsong Response (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Ironsong Response (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.628841608
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.468085106
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Block
On the Horizon (Yellow)
On the Horizon (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and On the Horizon (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.361194030
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Agile Engagement (Blue) and Remembrance that play both.