Pound for Pound (Red)
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When you play Pound for Pound, if you have less [Life] than an opposing hero, it gains dominate.Β (The defending hero can't defend Pound for Pound with more than 1 card from their hand.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.753.752712203
Average Defense Value: Β
2.382.375396326
Hero
Scurv, Stowaway
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Scurv, Stowaway that play both.
Kavdaen, Trader of Skins
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Kavdaen, Trader of Skins that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Kayo, Berserker Runt
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Kayo, Berserker Runt that play both.
Terra
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Terra that play both.
Equipment
Goliath Gauntlet
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Old Knocker
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Knucklehead
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Knucklehead that play both.
Nullrune Boots
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Skullhorn
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
Beaten Trackers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Savage Sash
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Buccaneer's Bounty
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Buccaneer's Bounty that play both.
Light Fingers
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Light Fingers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Crown of Providence
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Deep Blue
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Deep Blue that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Ironhide Legs
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Skull Crushers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Skull Crushers that play both.
Ironhide Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Ironrot Legs
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Mage Master Boots
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Flat Trackers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Flat Trackers that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Ironhide Plate
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Ironhide Plate that play both.
Bone Vizier
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Bone Vizier that play both.
Balance of Justice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Silver Palms
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Silver Palms that play both.
Crown of Dominion
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Weapon
Rugged Roller
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Rugged Roller that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Romping Club that play both.
Mandible Claw
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
Waning Moon
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Action
Chart a Course (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Chart a Course (Red) that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Portside Exchange that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Ready to Roll
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Ready to Roll that play both.
Sloggism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Sloggism (Blue) that play both.
Mutiny on the Battalion Barque
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Mutiny on the Battalion Barque that play both.
Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Mutiny on the Nimbus Sovereign that play both.
Scrub the Deck
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Scrub the Deck that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Sloggism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Sloggism (Red) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Rolling Thunder
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Rolling Thunder that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Crazy Brew
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Crazy Brew that play both.
Bad Beats (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Bad Beats (Red) that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Bad Beats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Bad Beats (Blue) that play both.
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
Reckless Charge
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Reckless Charge that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Potion of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Potion of Strength that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Awakening Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Awakening Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Talk a Big Game that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Truce that play both.
Attack Action
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Blow for a Blow
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Blow for a Blow that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.331.333333333
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Money or Your Life? (Red) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Sea Legs that play both.
Demolition Crew (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Demolition Crew (Red) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.232.232558140
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof
Avg. played: Β
2.272.266666667
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Ten Foot Tall and Bulletproof that play both.
Regurgitating Slog (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Regurgitating Slog (Red) that play both.
Wounded Bull (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Wounded Bull (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Walk the Plank (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Walk the Plank (Yellow) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Battalion Barque (Blue) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
HMS Kraken
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and HMS Kraken that play both.
HMS Marlin
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and HMS Marlin that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Money or Your Life? (Blue) that play both.
Money or Your Life? (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Money or Your Life? (Yellow) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Bam Bam
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Bam Bam that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
Predatory Assault (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Predatory Assault (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Savage Swing (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Savage Swing (Yellow) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Freewheeling Renegades (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Freewheeling Renegades (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Smash Instinct (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Yellow) that play both.
Riled Up (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Riled Up (Yellow) that play both.
Raging Onslaught (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Raging Onslaught (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Yellow) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Down But Not Out (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Down But Not Out (Blue) that play both.
Pound Town (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Pound Town (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Cut Down to Size (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Cut Down to Size (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Barraging Brawnhide (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Barraging Brawnhide (Red) that play both.
Brutal Assault (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Brutal Assault (Blue) that play both.
Raging Onslaught (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Raging Onslaught (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Red) that play both.
Down But Not Out (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Down But Not Out (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Numbskull
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Numbskull that play both.
Stony Woottonhog (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Stony Woottonhog (Red) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Strength Rules All that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Skull Crack that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Blue) that play both.
Wounded Bull (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Wounded Bull (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Smash with Big Tree (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Smash with Big Tree (Yellow) that play both.
Smash with Big Tree (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Smash with Big Tree (Red) that play both.
Savage Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Savage Swing (Red) that play both.
Adrenaline Rush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Adrenaline Rush (Red) that play both.
Pound Town (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Pound Town (Yellow) that play both.
Wage Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Wage Agility (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Brutal Assault (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Brutal Assault (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Cut Through the Facade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Cut Through the Facade that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Blue) that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Yellow) that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Not So Fast
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Not So Fast that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Pound for Pound (Red) and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.