Cut Through the Facade
Generic Attack Action - Attack
This can't be defended by auras.
When this hits a hero, you may destroy an aura they control.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.423.415740757
Average Defense Value: Β
2.632.633602142
Hero
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
741% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Crown of Providence
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Crown of Providence that play both.
Robe of Autumn's Fall
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
Okana Scar Wraps
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Okana Scar Wraps that play both.
Nullrune Boots
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Iris of the Blossom
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Flick Knives
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Flick Knives that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Nullrune Hood
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Skullhorn
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Skullhorn that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Savage Sash
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Savage Sash that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Storm Striders that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Tide Flippers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Tide Flippers that play both.
Metacarpus Node
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Mask of Momentum
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Arousing Wave
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Arousing Wave that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Traverse the Universe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Balance of Justice that play both.
Civic Steps
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Civic Steps that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Old Knocker
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Old Knocker that play both.
Mask of Deceit
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Tectonic Plating
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Base of the Mountain
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Calming Gesture
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Calming Gesture that play both.
Aurum Aegis
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Well Grounded
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Well Grounded that play both.
Pouncing Paws
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Face Purgatory
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Face Purgatory that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Spider's Bite that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Titan's Fist
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Titan's Fist that play both.
Scale Peeler
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Scale Peeler that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Mandible Claw
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Mandible Claw that play both.
Waning Moon
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Waning Moon that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Anothos
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Anothos that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Action
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.702.700111483
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and The Weakest Link that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Kiss of Death that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Dual Threat that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Overswing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Overswing (Red) that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Promising Terrain that play both.
Truce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Truce that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Burn Bare
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Burn Bare that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Portside Exchange that play both.
Scour
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Scour that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Tear Asunder that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Aether Arc that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Rage Specter that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.902.896269336
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Command and Conquer that play both.
Call for Backup
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714285714
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Call for Backup that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.872.868613139
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Enact Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Enact Vengeance that play both.
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Seek Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Seek Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Vengeance Never Rests
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Vengeance Never Rests that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.772.770833333
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Sea Legs that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
2.672.665577342
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Erase Face that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Spinal Crush that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Swing Big that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Beast Within that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Cranial Crush that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Send Packing that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Plow Under that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Aftershock (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Aftershock (Blue) that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Rubble Raiser (Blue) that play both.
Rubble Raiser (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Rubble Raiser (Red) that play both.
Aftershock (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Aftershock (Red) that play both.
Headbutt
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Headbutt that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Run Roughshod that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and The Golden Son that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Ripple Away that play both.
Censor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Censor that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Just a Nick that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Siren's Call that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Provoke that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.884838880
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.842.836415363
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.762.757975798
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and That All You Got? that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Reckless Swing that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Pass Over that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Preserve Tradition that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.541899441
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Ley Line of the Old Ones
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Ley Line of the Old Ones that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Will of Arcana
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through the Facade and Will of Arcana that play both.